Sentences with phrase «pay much mention»

Not exact matches

That's pretty small potatoes compared to the much larger deals done by rivals like Microsoft's (msft) $ 26 billion merger with LinkedIn, not to mention the $ 109 billion AT&T (t) is paying for Time Warner (twx).

The Trump administration has not spoken much about paid leave since the campaign, when it mentioned a six - week leave that would be available to new birth mothers.

As I mentioned earlier, your ad CTR directly affects your quality score, which in turn determines how much you pay per click.

Often the biggest banks have a roughly 50/50 split between net interest income and noninterest income, whereas the three banks mentioned above are much more dependent on the difference between what they take in, versus what they pay out:

The budget calls for tax reform that largely mirrors the House GOP's «Better Way» plan, though it does not mention much of the aspects that would pay for the changes in «Better Way» or other ways to make up for the revenue loss from the rate reductions it calls for.

But companies rarely have a flexible approach to capital allocation like this (they usually have a set dividend that they pay out each year, often steadily raising it by a few pennies each year, and then they buy back shares without much mention of value).

Although, it's worth mentioning that per capita taxes are used, albeit in much smaller sums, and that's one reason why lower income earners can end up paying a larger percentage of their income toward taxes.

I am mentioning this first because companies and people will tend to behave and adapt to how much budget they have and how they are paid.

I agree the CEO's make too much money, but a lot of others who are never mentioned can certainly pay more too.

Then he doesn't love us that much he just leaves it to luck like if the child is born in a good family christan family then chances are very high that he will go to heaven but to a bad family and also god knows better than me that if he destroyed satun and did whatever i mentioned in my commented the world would have been a outstanding place to live in if god can send his son to suffer then why not destroy satun or give him life sentence in hell or even better why din't he paid attention while making Adam and Eve and even if he din't why din't he renoved the tree of knowlage from the garden of Eden then he woundn't have to tell Adam and Eve not to eat any fruit from that tree

If it is truly immoral, then why not say so instead of giving rules on who you can have as a slave, how much you pay, how long they need to survive after you beat them to avoid consequences, not to mention a loophole on how to keep a Jewish slave forever instead of the 7 years.

Catholics who pay so much respect to Mary, the Mother of God (Theotokos) and honor so many female saints (eg, St. Therese of Lisieux, St. Teresa of Avila, St. Clare) not to mention those saints who stood up to Popes in a spirt of FAITHFULNESS (eg, St. Catherine of Siena, St. Brigid of Sweden, etc).

I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.

I probably mention them too much (and they don't even pay me to!)

I think someone who has proven himself in the PL is a much better idea than paying a fortune for one of the foreign keepers that are being mentioned as possibilities 3) Quite the opposite view of Elneny; I thought he was very lively when he came on.

The focus on labor peace — a lie former Commissioner and current Commissioner Emeritus Bud Selig loved to mention — helped bring the players here: There was too much union attention paid to veterans and the money they were already getting, and the money they would get once they hit free agency.

And that's not even mentioning how much ill will the fighters seem to have against him due to low pay, the Reebok deal, USADA and the list goes on.

Didn't Schnidelin play or was he just ordinary Just goes to show its not how much you pay for a player it's how he is on being consistent Now I could mention a player for Arsenal that has been consistent in the 4 games so far that didn't cost a penny but don't want to upset anybody COYG CB

Let's get real here.It is very unlikely that ANY professional player will ever say anything derogatory about a teammate that has just left the club.If Jack had said about Coq - «Grew up playing with him in the Youth Team and have fond memories of a player they though he had very limited ability he always gave his all.Very surprised and disappointed the club never invested in a World Class defensive midfielder that we have quite obviously been lacking for a number of seasons and would no doubt have improved the defensive weakness we have shown over a number of seasons» we would have echoed his thoughts entirely.If he had said about Theo - «A player who should have been so much better than he ended up being.He had everything needed to be a prolific player for our club but I can understand the fans frustrations with his continued lack - lustre performances and total lack of a football brain.I think this is best explained by the managers preference to play a player of such limited ability as Alex Iwobi in front of Theo pretty much says it all» we again would have all nodded our agreement.Although Jack never mentioned Alexis Sanchez I would imagine something along the lines of «If the Manager had not persisted with players with such limited ability such as Francis and Theo and instead bought the world class players needed into the club then Sanchez would still most likely be here.The fans must wonder what the hell goes on at the club as they pay fortunes for the privalage of following our club but it seems the millions generated ends up purchasing a new Texas Ranch for the Owner or in a yearly renumeration of # 9million pounds to our manager».

Not to mention anything on how much we pay this little up start.

I don't think any of the players mentioned above would ever earn as much as Arsenal pay them, which is probably just as big a stumbling block for sales as well as the inflated transfer fees.

like I've said before, Wenger is simply stating that Sanchez is staying so that he can regain some leverage when it comes time to make a deal and to shift the focus back squarely on Sanchez... this is 101 tactics in PR management... the very fact that he even mentioned RVP's name speaks to the utterance arrogance of a man that believes he answers to no one... before you harshly judge Sanchez think carefully about what the ultimate intentions of both parties involved... Sanchez wants to win trophies and get paid generously for his efforts, whereas the club wants to pull the wool over our eyes once again so that we blame the player for wanting the very things we told him we wanted when we brought him in... how many times do we have to go down this road before we realize the only common factor in each of these scenarios is the club itself... trust me, if we showed any ambition Sanchez's contract demands would be much different... just like in other major sports players will take a «home town» discount if they see those in charge making a truly honest attempt to fight for the highest honours in their respective fields... that being said, if they see a team trying to make disparaging remarks about them in the press and not following through on their promises, they will likely try to make them pay a premium for their services or seek greener pastures... btw if anyone simply looks at the score versus Bayern today and thinks that even for a second that this was a deserved victory, just watch the game and judge for yourself... actually save yourself the anguish and just know that if it weren't for Cech and Martinez this could have been a repeat of our Champions League flopping or worse

keep Sanchez (unless we get huge fee from outside epl) sell a few foreign players + one or two English to generate what we paid for Lacazette and what with 150 million mentioned war chest get two WC players one being replacement for Santi Cazorla and much missed Thomas Rosicky

It is funny that no one mentions his price tag anymore but if they did, especially with Man City having paid much more for both Sterling and De Bruyne, would they still be talking about Ozil's fee in a negative way?

Like previously mentioned, your divorce is about dividing up your assets fairly and legally but it is also about who pays maintenance, how much and when.

The consequence of this is to pit services for men and women against each other in an unseemly scrabble for cash, not to mention salami - slicing those much needed resources for women, robbing Petra to pay Paul.

Every state budget season in New York, when higher education is mentioned, the debate usually turns to how much tuition students at the state university should pay.

But despite a few mentions from the ACLU, New Yorkers haven't paid much attention to these big issues.

«How much an employer afford to pay is based upon his or her income; that will have to be considered, and that is why I mentioned trade unions, employers, and government would have to take a look at the way we negotiate and engage with one another.»

I haven't paid it much attention lately but after reading this I've realized I have made most of the change you've mentioned and the fat seems to be gone.

A successful man will pay much attention to his shoes, not to mention th →

Have I mentioned how much I LOVE pockets in dresses?!?!?! I love both looks and what's even better is the price tag I paid for both.

A successful man will pay much attention to his shoes, not to mention those elegant women who are in pursuit of perfection all the time.

How much will you pay to unlock all the features as mentioned above?

In fact, it is much better to get that paid membership than remain on the standard, free membership, due to the previously mentioned reasons.

As we've mentioned, we've had much lower success rates on free herpes dating sites than on paid herpes sites.

However, the cost of doing business, i.e. salaries paid to translators and representatives, etc., not to mention the internet costs in certain foreign countries (i.e. Russia, Ukraine) are much, much higher than traditional costs.

Not to mention there are other pro statements strengthening the case of online date - seeking: your chances are way bigger, rejecting others is far less painful or awkward, it's much cheaper than paying a dinner with everyone, and you can do it in your comfy chair, munching on snacks.

You'll see a winner and a runner - up as well as a list of honorable mentions that are sorta ranked but without too much scrutiny paid to that ranking.

But according to NEA, the reforms suggested by DFER (and many other groups) have «acquired a bit of a stench over the last few years, as the ideas with which it is most closely associated — high stakes accountability, vouchers, merit pay, charter schools, not to mention teacher bashing — have not worn well with much of the public.»

So far the GT2 seems a bit much for our purposes, not to mention I doubt if I can compete with the long time, loyal Porsche faithful - at that level, I'm not paying over list.

You'll pay extra for all of that in pretty much every competitor, not to mention standard rear - wheel drive and that Hemi, and how can you put a price on those?

For sure, we know we mentioned earlier about «money no object» options, and it is noticeably less than what you'd pay for an equivalent Porsche Macan, but that's an awful lot of money to spend on an engine that's not much better than the standard version you can buy for even less money.

There is a chapter devoted to Book Reviews with no mention of the extremely important and controversial issue of paid vs. free reviews, and no annotations as to which of those listed charges authors for providing reviews nor how much they charge.

but overall, i've found the same thing, folk are not wanting to pay for single shorts as much anymore, for lots of the reasons you mention john --

So I guess the real question isn't so much, to me, how do I feel about paying for positive reviews as much as paying for reviews at all, since most often a writer, or publisher, is more likely to pay a reviewer for a positive review than a negative one, and likely reviewers, and reviewing companies — not just the one mentioned in the article — know that.

Back in August, our newsletter mentioned how Storybundle proposed the new initiatives for readers to reward their favorite authors by deciding how much they should pay for their novels on top of the minimum requirement of $ 7.

Retirement Income Planning: So much attention is paid to the tax differences between the Roth and traditional retirement accounts that the other advantages are rarely mentioned.

The original poster mentioned that he thought he might be paying too much for renters insurance.

Funny how they never mention much about if the companies that pay them illegally... sorry «make a mistake» on your credit report that hurts your credit score.