Not exact matches
As BuzzFeed
points out,
rather than spend marketing money on a traditional online ad campaign — which would involve
paying someone to create an ad and then
paying to place it on Facebook, or another social website, or even
with the publishers who so desperately need the ad dollars — businesses are sending more of that money to Facebook to promote content created for free by publishers.
At this
point, I'd
rather pay to watch Sánchez play
with the ball in my backyard than get embarrassed by his teammates and that clown of a boss.
Finally, and to reiterate an earlier
point, the way forward for this club is to stop
paying below average bench players so much money and to focus the bulk of the weekly wages on establishing a dominant starting 11... this will require the club to eat some wages in order to ship some players out, get rid of any deadwood over the age of 21, develop a cutting edge scouting service and put your money where your mouth is for once... I would much
rather have a starting 11 that was world - class and give some reasonably
paid young blue - chippers playing time when injuries occur than have 2 or 3 world class players surrounded by a plethora of overpaid and underwhelming players... management would no longer be able to sell their half - baked plans to the fans under the guise of «winning now», which any intelligent fan knows is a crap - shoot at best, and instead create a a squad that provides hope for the present and the future... this is exactly the model that has been used by Barcelona, Real & Bayern, so it should be good enough for us... by the way, until Messi & Ronaldo re-signed just recently all 3 clubs weekly wages were on par
with ours... think about that for a second or two
Without the game's two selling
points — the mental thrill of tactical work
paid off by the visceral enjoyment of combat gameplay — viewers are left
with a sub-Tolkien setting and a poor,
rather clichéd story.
He also
points out that collective - bargaining districts focus on seniority, protecting various benefits associated
with longevity
rather than pushing for higher
pay.
Reward
Points (Airline Miles) for Debit Cards: Many people argue they would
rather use credit cards so that they can «earn» airline miles or other free rewards
with every purchase in lieu of
paying for everything
with «cash» (or debit cards).
And as
with interest that you
pay over the course of the loan, the amount you
pay in
points is generally tax - deductible (this assumes that it still makes financial sense for you to itemize your deductions
rather than take the new higher standard deduction).
If it doesn't, I do have an upcoming Marriott stay which I can
pay for
with the gift card,
rather than the
points I was planning to use.
Personally, I'd
rather simply
pay the $ 115 cash fare on AtlasJet or use
points from an Arrival card in order to cover the cash cost, but that's only because this many
points are a relatively poor redemption value when compared to the obscene value Donna can attain
with the rest of her itinerary.
Luckily for me, we had good luck
with the two other
rather expensive meals in Copenhagen — both restaurants charged a 2.9 % fee that I had to
pay in addition to the bill, but both also posted correctly as restaurants and earned 3X Ultimate Rewards
points.
In the example above the reward nights costs 35,000
points but,
rather than
pay the full 35,000
points, I can buy 20,000 IHG Rewards
points for $ 97.75 and, together
with 15,000
points from my IHG Rewards account, I can book the room.
I will
pay for a $ 1 parking charge
with a credit card
rather than a $ 1 bill... every
point / mile counts!
Club Carlson is offering a 100 % bonus on all
points purchases regardless of how many
points you buy and,
rather unusually, Carlson hasn't played around
with the pricing so you're always
paying the same per Gold
Point — buying more Gold points makes no difference to the cost per p
Point — buying more Gold
points makes no difference to the cost per
pointpoint.
Simply book your airline ticket, hotel stay, car rental, cruise or tour package
with your RBC Rewards Credit or debit card just as you would if you were
paying for the trip
rather than redeeming
points.
Some of the reduced properties do look appealing until you realize that in most cases you're still better off
paying with cash
rather than
points.
When booking an IHG Rewards night, IHG will offer the ability to
pay for some of the booking
with cash,
rather than needing to use
points for the full booking.
While I consider it fair to ask for a higher price for a large home or condo, it does require you to look carefully, if it is still good value to rent a larger home
with points,
rather than
paying cash for it!
If you'd
rather buy merchandise directly from the merchant, you can shop or
pay with points at selected Citi partners.
Whether you're working toward a revenue requirement for elite airline status or you can't find award availability for your travel dates, sometimes you have to
pay for a ticket
with cash
rather than miles or
points.
Now there are some that will argue that in situations like this, you should just
pay cash instead,
rather than burning valuable Chase Ultimate Rewards at only 1.25 cents per
point, and if you're one of those people I can't argue
with your logic.
For
paid stays, if you usually
pay with a co-brand HH AMEX card, make sure to do the simple math before you
pay with a visa, as you might forgo of the
rather significant bonus
points that you could earn if you
paid with an HH AMEX card.
At the end of the day haters will be haters and to add to your post Stinkflipper EVE is the biggest
pay to win game I have ever seen I mean
rather than starting the game from scratch I can go on the net buy an account
with a relay good ship and skills and kick ass or I have to spend hundreds of dollars if not thousands just to get any where in monthly fees, like when I started to play in order to start this new mission I needed a new ship but to get that new ship I needed to learn a new skill but to learn that skill I needed another skill that took 1h then the main skill took some thing like 3h then I needed to get weapons and guess what that needed a new skill but this one was going to take a month so at that
point I was like WTF!!!!! because that was a whole month sub gone just to do that.
At that
point I was
rather taken
with Atlus» US output, and following the purchase of my beloved Demon's Souls I began
paying ever more attention to their releases.
The base game will cost $ 10 which is on par
with the previous instalments
with the option to
pay for expansions, the full decks a full foil conversion for cosmetic purposes and more campaign options however
with Magic 2015 you have the option to
pay an additional $ 20 to unlock all the cards which can push the price
point to $ 30
rather than grind though the single player mode and you are not guaranteed to get all of the cards in this manner, however this isn't the biggest problem.
And wouldn't those talking
points pack a fatal punch
with reporters if you could say a Pulitzer winning investigative reporter discovered a leaked coal industry memo which was proof for skeptic climate scientists being
paid to «reposition global warming as theory
rather than fact.»
But it does suggest that if both sides of the debate
paid close attention to the social consequences of policies,
rather than the present intractable debate on the reality of AGW, then we might get to a
point where we can agree on some action — you might think it is pointless
with regard to the climate (but a substantial proportion of people think it will), but if it produces some other good outcomes it might be ok.
But it does suggest that if both sides of the debate
paid close attention to the social consequences of policies,
rather than the present intractable debate on the reality of AGW, then we might get to a
point where we can agree on some action — you might think it is pointless
with regard to the climate (but a substantial proportion of people think it will), but if it produces some other good outcomes it might be OK.
One of Brook's examples is an ACLU lawyer, but that case proves my
point — under its Gen - X president Anthony Romero, the ACLU ramped up its starting
pay for lawyers from $ 36,000 to $ 59,000, which is not competitive
with firms but enough to make it possible to be an ACLU lawyer if you actually want to be an ACLU lawyer,
rather than just pretending that you might want to do something socially useful but can't.
That's a
point made by Doug Berman at the Sentencing Law Blog («
Rather, I wish primarily to urge anyone and everyone defending President Bush's sentencing determination in the Libby case to explain why all these less prominent defendants — most of whom are now locked in a cell while Libby now makes plans for the
paid lecture circuit — don't also merit some executive sympathy»); Ellen Pogdor at White Collar Crime Blog («But what is bothersome here is that one elite individual is receiving this benefit while others
with comparable circumstances will not have this benefit — it all comes down to who has access to the President.
More over, whats the
point if you had to
pay Rs. 5 lakhs for a treatment and you are concerned to save those Rs. 5 lakhs all the years that you lived in saving
rather than insuring
with a much lesser amount.
Touch ID is practically a necessity on Apple's devices at this
point: It provides an easy unlock process for opening your iPad, sure, but it also lets users
pay for purchases online and via the App Store
with their fingerprint,
rather than typing in lengthy passwords or remembering credit card information.