Terminal bonus is
payable on termination of the policy.
Often, an employer may seek to limit its liability on termination of employment by requiring the employee to sign a contract which purports to limit the sum which is
payable on termination of employment without just cause.
Not exact matches
Actual results may vary materially from those expressed or implied by forward - looking statements based
on a number of factors, including, without limitation: (1) risks related to the consummation of the Merger, including the risks that (a) the Merger may not be consummated within the anticipated time period, or at all, (b) the parties may fail to obtain shareholder approval of the Merger Agreement, (c) the parties may fail to secure the
termination or expiration of any waiting period applicable under the HSR Act, (d) other conditions to the consummation of the Merger under the Merger Agreement may not be satisfied, (e) all or part of Arby's financing may not become available, and (f) the significant limitations
on remedies contained in the Merger Agreement may limit or entirely prevent BWW from specifically enforcing Arby's obligations under the Merger Agreement or recovering damages for any breach by Arby's; (2) the effects that any
termination of the Merger Agreement may have
on BWW or its business, including the risks that (a) BWW's stock price may decline significantly if the Merger is not completed, (b) the Merger Agreement may be terminated in circumstances requiring BWW to pay Arby's a
termination fee of $ 74 million, or (c) the circumstances of the
termination, including the possible imposition of a 12 - month tail period during which the
termination fee could be
payable upon certain subsequent transactions, may have a chilling effect
on alternatives to the Merger; (3) the effects that the announcement or pendency of the Merger may have
on BWW and its business, including the risks that as a result (a) BWW's business, operating results or stock price may suffer, (b) BWW's current plans and operations may be disrupted, (c) BWW's ability to retain or recruit key employees may be adversely affected, (d) BWW's business relationships (including, customers, franchisees and suppliers) may be adversely affected, or (e) BWW's management's or employees» attention may be diverted from other important matters; (4) the effect of limitations that the Merger Agreement places
on BWW's ability to operate its business, return capital to shareholders or engage in alternative transactions; (5) the nature, cost and outcome of pending and future litigation and other legal proceedings, including any such proceedings related to the Merger and instituted against BWW and others; (6) the risk that the Merger and related transactions may involve unexpected costs, liabilities or delays; (7) other economic, business, competitive, legal, regulatory, and / or tax factors; and (8) other factors described under the heading «Risk Factors» in Part I, Item 1A of BWW's Annual Report
on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2016, as updated or supplemented by subsequent reports that BWW has filed or files with the SEC.
Finally, check the amount
payable on early
termination of the lease.
Furthermore, in order to ensure that a servicer has sufficient time to explore all possible loss mitigation options, in calculating the guaranty claim
payable on a terminated loan, VA allows inclusion of interest for 210 days from the due date of the last paid installment, plus the reasonable period that VA has established for completion of
termination in the jurisdiction where the loan is located.
Regardless of whether the Notice of
Termination is given for the landlord's own use under s. 48 or on behalf of a purchaser under s. 49, if the person who claimed to require possession under those sections fails to occupy the rental unit «within a reasonable time after the former tenant vacated the rental unit» (s. 57 (1) RTA), the landlord will be liable under the RTA for failing to give a «good faith» notice of termination and will be liable to significant financial penalties payable to a former tenant and to the Landlord and Tenant Board under s.
Termination is given for the landlord's own use under s. 48 or
on behalf of a purchaser under s. 49, if the person who claimed to require possession under those sections fails to occupy the rental unit «within a reasonable time after the former tenant vacated the rental unit» (s. 57 (1) RTA), the landlord will be liable under the RTA for failing to give a «good faith» notice of
termination and will be liable to significant financial penalties payable to a former tenant and to the Landlord and Tenant Board under s.
termination and will be liable to significant financial penalties
payable to a former tenant and to the Landlord and Tenant Board under s. 57 (3) RTA.
In a judgement released in April, the Court of Appeal held that the trial judge erred by finding that the employer had promised Mr. Aubrey that the severance package was
payable on retirement, as opposed to only
on termination.
The vexing problem relating to the issue of the calculation of compensation
payable to commercial agents
on termination of their agency agreement has arisen once more in the revolutionary judgment of the Court of Appeal in the case of Lonsdale v Howard & Hallam Limited [2006] EWCA Civ 63 made
on 6 February 2006.
Regardless of whether the Notice of
Termination is given for landlord's own use under s. 48 or on behalf of a purchaser under s. 49, if the person who claimed to require possession under those sections fails to occupy the rental unit «within a reasonable time after the former tenant vacated the rental unit» (s. 57 (1) RTA), the landlord will be liable under the RTA for failing to give a «good faith» notice of termination and will be liable to significant financial penalties payable to a former tenant and to the Landlord and Tenant Board under s.
Termination is given for landlord's own use under s. 48 or
on behalf of a purchaser under s. 49, if the person who claimed to require possession under those sections fails to occupy the rental unit «within a reasonable time after the former tenant vacated the rental unit» (s. 57 (1) RTA), the landlord will be liable under the RTA for failing to give a «good faith» notice of
termination and will be liable to significant financial penalties payable to a former tenant and to the Landlord and Tenant Board under s.
termination and will be liable to significant financial penalties
payable to a former tenant and to the Landlord and Tenant Board under s. 57 (3) RTA.
Damages for wrongful dismissal are not
payable in priority to other expenses pursuant to the Insolvency Act 1986, Sch B1, para 99 (4) to (6), since a payment in respect of the period after the date of
termination of employment can not amount to «wages» but rather is a payment by the employer
on account of the employee's claim for damages for breach of contract.
Upon surrendering the policy after the completion of the lock - in period of 5 years, the fund value as
on the date of
termination is
payable.
The cash value
payable by the insurance company
on termination of the policy contract at the desire of Policyholder but before the expiry term is known as Surrender Value.
Once the company accepts the claim under this rider, all future premium (s) are waived; then in case of
termination of base policy due to happening of any listed insured event or,
on surrender (only if surrender value is available under the base policy), the following benefits are
payable: -
•
On encashment of leaves by a member while in service or in case of death / retirement / resignation or
termination, the Master Policyholder will be paid an amount equivalent to the amount
payable to the member as per the Company's Leave Encashment Rules, by canceling the units of equivalent amount from the master policyholder's account.
Hence, there is no maturity benefit
payable on policy
termination.
In an Ontario case, the listing indicated that a commission was
payable on «completed transaction» within six months of
termination of the listing agreement.