Sentences with phrase «paying their support if»

But if you do file a copy, the court can make a former spouse pay support if he or she stops payment.

Also, in the same regard, they can not stop paying their support if a custodial parent denies them access to their children.

Provinces and territories can enforce a support order or a written agreement to pay support if the support is not paid.

TORONTO — A woman who signed a deal without legal advice decades ago in which she agreed her spouse would never have to pay support if their relationship broke down has lost... Read more

You won't be able to take legal action against the person paying support if they don't pay the amount you agreed on.

Not exact matches

«If I had to speculate, [the layoffs occurred] because Fancy isn't making enough money to support the business and pay salaries, and the investment money from last year (about $ 60 million) is pretty much all gone,» one person says.

Even if the size of your company doesn't support all three roles, pay heed to the responsibilities and the challenges involved.

If employers aren't going to pay up to support BYOD they better be ready to pay to give their employees some better technology.

If you will not have enough money in either a traditional IRA or a Roth IRA to support you upon retirement and you're perhaps looking to Social Security to give you that boost, it's possible that you may have to pay taxes on some of your benefits.

Apple Pay is still relatively young, but don't be surprised if the service will adapt to support older machines.

You'll need an app, hardware, and a payment - processing solution if you decide to accept mobile payments — which Tweedt recommends, as many shoppers look for stores that support Apple Pay.

«I still have a daughter that's in high school that will be looking to go on to medical school, and now I'll know that I have an income that can support that and help her through it,» he said, adding that he doesn't know yet if the Carrier agreement will mean pay cuts for him and other employees.

This may involve using privatization proceeds to pay down debt, higher corporate taxes, and even higher income taxes if other forms of wealth transfer are robust enough to support them, but one way or another total government debt must be reduced, or at least its growth must be contained to les than real GDP growth.

Remuneration of a covered employee paid by an applicable tax - exempt organization includes amounts paid by a related person or government entity if the person or entity controls, or is controlled by, the applicable tax - exempt organization; is controlled by a person, or persons, that control the organization; or is a supported or supporting organization.

I'd love to get your support for the Yakezie Writing Contest to help students pay for their college education if you're up for it.

Local phone support numbers are available for a lot of European countries, which is a big plus, because even if you speak English you might not want to pay for an expensive phone call abroad.

She hasn't specified how she'd pay for this infrastructure spending, but Bill Clinton has supported a «repatriation holiday» that would allow companies to bring back cash if they invested 10 % in infrastructure bonds.

These individuals are likely to stick with the old rules — generally speaking, it would only make sense to change to the new tax treatment if the ex-spouse paying the support is in a lower tax bracket than the recipient.

If we compare operating spending by municipalities to GDP, which is a broad measure of ability to pay, it remains within historical averages of close to 3 % of GDP.  In 2012, operating spending by all municipalities in Canada amounted to just 3.1 % of GDP, the same that it was twenty years ago, and down from the 3.3 % reached in 2009 during the depths of the recession.  This ratio was higher during the recession because GDP had dropped and governments sensibly embarked on stimulus spending to prevent a depression. This was before their misguided adventures in austerity (which presumably the CFIB supports, but have caused devastation to small businesses in countries elsewhere).

Balance sheet friendly, supports long and short positions (receive vs. pay), The position can be unwound quickly on - demand Cons: swap spreads risk exposure if the investor wants to hedge instruments correlated with part of the Treasury curve.

I am firmly middle class, and I am fine with a flat tax (and indeed support it for its simplicity — why does the government care if I pay for my dental expenses through my employer or more directly?)

If your Mother supports your use of contraceptives, you and she should pay for it.

They are not trying to regulate what you do with your body — they are saying that if you want them to pay for it then they will not support it or pay for it.

So if I have a business and my religion teaches that war and weapons of war are immoral... My business doesn't have to pay taxes because some of those taxes will be used to buy weapons or to support the war in Afghanistan???

And had those 45,722 babies been born in 2009, there would be 45,722 more people that tax money would pay for to live, as clearly the parents were financially unable to support the estimated $ 10K per year cost to sufficiently raise a child if they were using Medicaid to pay for their heath care procedures.

I am christian and i don't understand this crap... IF u don't support abortion don't do it, but why should you prevent other people from it (is it better for them to pay a thousand dollar to an unlicensed doctor for abortion and die?

I do believe that as a nation we will be in trouble if we do not pay some attention to the ever growing gap in wealth in this country, government is VITAL to a healthy nation, and supporting a woman's right to chose is NOT a communist decision.

And when someone inquires about renting the building for a wedding, a funeral, or a support group, we tell them they need to come to church on Sunday, sign release forms, pay a deposit and rental fee, and if they get approved, refrain from drinking, smoking, or swearing on the premises.

If you are not able to find some source of monetary support through your current efforts to minister to others... you will have to do less ministering and find some other sort of job that pays money.

So take it from someone that does nt even support this guy, if this was as extreme as he gets I might even pay more attention to him.

If you think people don't tear into religious organizations for supporting and encouraging hatred and discrimination, you haven't been paying attention.

If they truly want to be a witness, they should be taking care of their employees by [1] paying them a living wage and [2] supporting them with health care, not trying to run their lives by denying it because they personally don't believe in birth control *** AHEM HOBBY LOBBY, all you had to do was voice your objection and step aside, and the provider would absorb the cost, but NOOOOOOOOOO, you thought you knew better & said I FORBID YOU TO HAVE IT so your employees lost out on ALL health care, nice work in the name of the Great Physician *** or firing them because they get pregnant BECAUSE you didn't let them have birth control...

If ye establish worship and pay the poor - due, and believe in My messengers and support them, and lend unto Allah a kindly loan, surely I shall remit your sins, and surely I shall bring you into gardens underneath which rivers flow.

Even if it were possible to replace fathers with government supports, better - paying jobs for single mothers, day care and elaborate social and extended - family networks, it would be unhealthy for both men and society to have increasing numbers of single men adrift without connections to families.

If they were a medical necessity I'd support the move, but since abstinence is a choice there's no reason to force them to go against their beliefs and pay for birth control when alternatives exist.

I think this is a great question, but that most of us pastors fear to face it, because if we discover that the Bible doesn't support the professional, full - time, paid pastor, we would be faced with a tough decision: quit our jobs or ignore Scripture.

Television is a capital - intensive industry and regardless of how much charisma or vocal support one may have, if one does not have the money to produce a program and pay for its syndication one does not succeed in television.

can't imagine any country without sick, elderly, retarded, disabled, mentally challenged, addictive personality types (20 % of humanity), discriminated, etc etc living amongs those of us that are «fortunate» enough to be both hard working and have jobs or job opportunities (oops fewer and fewer as the «greedy» capitalist does what they have to do for an even bigger yacht) that actually pays enough for basic needs for oneself... and again «lucky» if it pays enough to support any offspring's needs as well.

I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.

Because tax inversion has been a hot topic this year, Burger King's Facebook followers have let them know they will not support the chain if its purpose is to evade paying taxes in the United States.

«But I'm a great believer in ensuring that they get at least one chance and they get very clear support to get it right, but if they don't, at an executive level you're paying far too much to be sitting around waiting and making sure if someone's training or not.»

«If you're paying $ 1.99 for a candy bar, you're not going to be able to support much of anything except the bottom line of the big manufacturer, because the economics don't bear that out,» she says.

Arsenal won't pay the money = not getting the player Also if wenger wants Seri he will have to pay 45 / 50mil for him aswell so that won't happen either coz wenger wants players for the price they were in the 90's when u look a the teams needs its obvious lemar would be a massive players for us the same way santi was coz we miss real talent so u'd think arsenal would make sure lemar is signed so they can concentrate on a CM but it's not looking good and I'm sick of supporting the worst club in the transfer market iv ever seen!

If I were him I would say, listen, thanks for the support and I will pay you by asking salary game based.

ECL Qualification and UEFA Money has paid off the Lion's share of The Emirates Stadium Debt — if we hadn't qualified for the ECL every year — especially in the 8 Financially constrained years — ARSENAL — THE ARSENAL — the Club we ALL Love and Support — would be Bankrupt by Now.

I support what you are saying bro.A lot of people believe they know what will happen next season as if they know the future.Why worry yourself if you think Arsene Wenger won't sign top quality or make any impact next season.They might as well tell us our future.The only two things which can make Arsenal win things is only if they change their poor mentality and if Wenger changes his poor nanagerial skills.It's never been about players but because the club never pays attention to these things we keep failing season after season.

If wenger is expecting the Real Fan's (who pay hard earned cash to support and watch these clowns) to fight and take the blame for the team and wenger's failures then mr wenger should put these same fan's on the payroll!

You've always had the support of we fans by paying for the highest match ticket in europe if that is not loyalty then what is it?

Did I understand correctly if we do not support the Club by paying the obscene amount of money that costs each time you go to watch a game, then our spot for the CL is in doibt.....

Hell, feed me, house me, and pay my business expenses and you wouldn't even have to pay me a dime... my wife would probably leave me if I did that so they'd have to cover my child support too, but I'd definitely take that, lol.