This Act amends the probation, conditional sentence and
peace bond provisions of the Criminal Code to provide explicit authority for a court to include a condition that an offender must provide a bodily sample on demand or at regular intervals to police and probation officers.
Similar to some security certificate cases, recent amendments to the Criminal Code's
peace bond provisions provide that reasonable conditions could include prohibitions on the use of the internet, use of electronic monitoring, curfews and geographic restrictions.
The language of
the peace bond provisions is vague and archaic in its reference to the oxymoronic concept of «reasonable fears».
Not exact matches
In relation to the Criminal Code amendments, we make recommendations on issues ranging from the terrorist entities list, to the terrorist speech and propaganda
provisions to the
peace bond and warrantless arrest
provisions.
The main difference between the two types of
peace bonds is that a s. 810
peace bond is limited by the
provisions of the statute, whereas common law
peace bonds are not.
There are no specific
provisions in the Criminal Code dealing with the impact on residential tenancies of
peace bonds or bail / sentencing orders providing for no contact and / or no attendance at the family residence.
The Ontario Court of Appeal has upheld similar non-terrorism
provisions from Charter challenge, stressing that
peace bonds were included in the original 1892 Criminal Code and had their origins in a 1361 British statute.