Comparing the effect of bench press method, Clark et al. (2008) found a main difference in
peak force output at 55 % and 80 % of 1RM between the Smith machine bench press and Smith machine bench throw as well as a greater proportion of the range of motion displaying > 75 % peak force when performing the bench throw compared with the bench press at 80 % 1RM.
Greater relative loads and performing the bench press with maximal concentric velocity are associated with greater
peak force output.
Comparing the effect of training variables, Clark et al. (2008) found that
peak force output increased with greater relative load between 55 % and 80 % of 1RM performed on a smith machine using the Plyobrake system.
Noe et al. (1992) assessed erector spinae muscle activity during an isokinetic machine deadlift, and found that erector spinae muscle activity peaked at 83 % of lift height, which was after the point where
peak force output was produced (67 % of lift).
Not exact matches
Dr. John Garhammer — brilliant mind, with a terrific understanding of Newtonian mechanics, physics and mathematics and a great deal of experience in training athletes, from Olympic weightlifters to throwers — addressed the important similarities in terms of
peak power
output (a derivative of absolute strength) and rate of
force development between Olympic weightlifters, high jumpers, and throwers.
Jump shrugs display greater
peak power
output,
peak force,
peak velocity, and
peak angular velocities than the hang clean and high pull.
The jump shrug displays highest
peak power
outputs,
peak velocity,
peak joint angular velocities,
peak vertical displacement, and
peak landing
forces with low loads (30 — 40 % of 1RM hang power clean).
Training with weightlifting derivatives improves weightlifting derivative performance, lower body strength (as measured by 1RM squat and
force production),
peak power
output, and vertical jump height.
As Garhammer (1980) noted, power
output calculated by reference to barbell linear displacement over time will necessarily underestimate the true value, as
peak displacement involves a period of deceleration in which no
force is applied by the athlete.
Peak force and peak power output tend to be greater in the mid-thigh power clean, mid-thigh pull and jump shrug weightlifting derivatives than in the power clean, hang power clean, and high p
Peak force and
peak power output tend to be greater in the mid-thigh power clean, mid-thigh pull and jump shrug weightlifting derivatives than in the power clean, hang power clean, and high p
peak power
output tend to be greater in the mid-thigh power clean, mid-thigh pull and jump shrug weightlifting derivatives than in the power clean, hang power clean, and high pull.
Peak force and peak power output increase with increasing load, but RFD does
Peak force and
peak power output increase with increasing load, but RFD does
peak power
output increase with increasing load, but RFD does not.
Comparing the hang clean, jump shrug, and high pull, Suchomel et al. (2014a; 2015d) found that the jump shrug produced greater
peak power
output,
peak GRF, and
peak velocity than either the hang clean or the high pull, although the
force - time curves are similar across the first 80 % of the movement (Suchomel et al. 2015d).
The hang power clean produces less
peak force and power
output than other weightlifting derivatives like the jump shrug and high pull.
Peak force, peak power output and RFD are all greater in the mid-thigh power clean and mid-thigh clean pull than in the power clean or hang power cl
Peak force,
peak power output and RFD are all greater in the mid-thigh power clean and mid-thigh clean pull than in the power clean or hang power cl
peak power
output and RFD are all greater in the mid-thigh power clean and mid-thigh clean pull than in the power clean or hang power clean.
Comparing the hang power clean, jump shrug, and high pull, Suchomel et al. (2014a; 2015d) found that the jump shrug produced greater
peak power
output,
peak GRF, and
peak velocity than either the hang clean or the high pull, although the
force - time curves are similar across the first 80 % of the movement (Suchomel et al. 2015d).
This suggests that light loads in the mid-thigh pull are best for maximising power
outputs, while heavy loads are best for maximising
peak force production, as with many other weightlifting derivatives.
Since strength is velocity - specific, not everyone automatically has an optimal
force - velocity profile for producing
peak power
output in a vertical jump.
With NO change in motor unit number or individual power
output, the
force peak is now well over 100.
If there is any criticism to have, it's that the
peak torque
output on both 3.0 - liter choices isn't available at lower revs, meaning you'll need to wring the six - cylinder unit out a bit before you have access to all the Jaguar XF's twisting
force.