Sentences with phrase «peak height not»

Not exact matches

Researcher and professor of medicine Michael F. Holick told the site that a vitamin D deficiency can not only cause rickets (a bone deformity and fractures disease), but it can also stop a toddler from getting to their «genetically programmed height and peak bone mass.»

Demand for oil in developed nations peaked in 2005, and changing demographics and improved motor - vehicle efficiency guarantee that it won't hit those heights again, IHS Cambridge Energy Research Associates says in a new report.

The sudden appearance of transparent gas at the shock boundary breaks up the spectrum of light from the quasar so that it is split into two intensity peaks of different height, instead of rising and falling smoothly as the wavelength changes if was not ionizd.

However, the picture is not entirely clear, as Kawamori et al. (2005) reported no relationship between 1RM hang power clean and vertical jump height and Khamoui et al. (2011) reported no relationship between peak force in the mid-thigh pull and vertical jump height.

Unlike internal combustion engines that need oxygen to produce power (something that's pretty rare at the high altitude of the Pikes Peak course), electric motors don't have to breathe and will make the same power at any height.

Not only does it reach these giddy heights, but peak power is delivered 1000rpm higher than the more conventional V8 at 7500rpm, too.

Our intention on this day was to celebrate not just the loftiest heights of British sports car construction but also its minor summits, for in sports car - ing as in mountaineering and in life, many more will actually become acquainted with the low peaks than the high ones.

(octane) / Capacity (gal): Diesel / 24.5 SAE Peak Horsepower: 188 @ 3,800 rpm SAE Peak Torque (lb - ft): 325 @ 1,400 rpm Transmission Type: 5 - speed Automatic Model: NAG1 Ratios First: 3.595:1; Second: 2.186:1; Third: 1.405:1; Fourth: 1.00:1; Fifth: 0.83:1; Reverse: 3.167:1 Transfer Case Type: 2 - speed with 65 % rear, 35 % front Model: N / A Low - Range Ratio: 1.4 Axles Front Type: IFS Front Diff: N / A Hubs: Automatic Rear Type: Solid Rear Diff: N / A Ratio 3.923:1 Traction Aid: Electronically controlled traction system (4ETS)(front and rear) Suspension Front: Transversally mounted monoleaf spring; reinforced shock absorbers; stabilizer bar Rear: longitudinally mounted leaf springs; reinforced shock absorbers Steering Type: Rack - and - pinion Lock - to - Lock: 3.375 Turning Circle (ft): 47.6 Wheels 6.5 Jx16 aluminum alloy Tires 265 / 75R16 BFGoodrich KO2 All Terrain Brakes Front: Disc Rear: Disc 60 - 0 mph As Tested (ft): 134.7 Acceleration 0 - 60 mph As Tested (sec): 14.43 Weight (lb) Curb Weight: 6,040 Advertised GVWR: 8,550 Trailer Tow Capacity: 5,000 Mileage (mpg) EPA Estimate (city / hwy): 21/29 As Tested: 17.38 Dimensions (in) Wheelbase: 145 3/4 Overall Length: 239 Overall Width: 96 1/2 Overall Height: 100 1/4 Front, Rear Track: 67 7/8, 68 1/4 Front, Rear Overhang: 25, 38 Min.

(octane) / Capacity (gal): 91/25.4 SAE Peak Horsepower: 416 @ 5,250 rpm SAE Peak Torque (lb - ft): 450 @ 2,250 rpm Transmission Type: 7 - speed automatic transmission with steering wheel mounted shift paddles Model: 7G - Tronic Ratios: First: 4.38:1; Second: 2.86:1; Third: 1.92:1; Fourth: 1.37:1; Fifth: 1.00:1; Sixth: 0.82:1; Seventh: 0.73:1; Reverse 1: 3.42:1 Reverse 2:2.23:1 Transfer Case Type: 2 - speed transfer case, fulltime with locking center differential Model: N / A Low - Range Ratio: N / A Axles Front Type: Solid Front Diff: manual locking Hubs: Automatic Rear Type: Solid Rear Diff: Manual locking Ratio: 4.38 Traction Aid: locking differentials (front and rear) and 4 - Wheel Electronic Traction System (4ETS) Suspension Front: Rigid Axle with longitudinal and transverse links, coil springs, gas - pressurized shock absorbers, stabilizer bar Rear: Rigid Axle with longitudinal and transverse links, coil springs, gas - pressurized shock absorbers Steering Type: Hydraulic assist recirculating ball box Lock - to - Lock: 3.25 Turning Circle (ft): 44.6 Wheels 7.5 J x 19 aluminum alloy Tires P275 / 55R19 Pirelli Scorpion Zero Brakes Front: Internally vented rotor 12.4 - inch discs Rear: Internally vented 10.7 - inch discs 60 - 0 mph As Tested (ft): 95 Acceleration 0 - 60 mph As Tested (sec): 7.92 Weight (lb) Curb Weight (As Tested): 5,900 Advertised GVWR: 7,056 Trailer Tow Capacity: 7,000 Mileage (mpg) EPA Estimate (city / hwy): 13/14 As Tested: 12.24 Dimensions (in) Wheelbase: 112 Overall Length: 188 1/2 Overall Width: 81 1/2 Overall Height: 77 1/2 Front, Rear Track: 59 3/4, 59 3/8 Front, Rear Overhang: 17 1/4, 27 Min.

(octane) / Capacity (gal): Diesel / 26 SAE Peak Horsepower: 310 @ 3,200 rpm SAE Peak Torque (lb - ft): 555 @ 1,600 rpm Transmission Type: 6 - speed automatic Model: Aisin A466ND Ratios: First: 3.742:1; Second: 2.003:1; Third: 1.343:1; Fourth: 1.00:1; Fifth: 0.773:1; Sixth: 0.634:1; Reverse: 3.539:1 Transfer Case Type: 2 - speed part time Model: Magna TX91A Low - Range Ratio: 2.717:1 Axles Front Type: IFS Front Diff: AAM 235 mm (9 1/4) open Hubs: Automatic Rear Type: Solid Rear Diff: AAM 250 mm with GKN LDC3 - 2 manual locking differential (PRO-4X) Ratio: 3.916:1 Traction Aid: Vehicle Dynamic Control, Traction Control System, Hill Start Assist, Hill Descent Control (front and rear) Suspension Front: IFS double - wishbone; 36 mm stabilizer bar; Bilstein Monotube coilover shocks Rear: Solid axle with multileaf; 18 mm stabilizer bar Steering Type: Hydraulic - assist recirculating ball Lock - to - Lock: 3.75 Turning Circle (ft): 53.8 Wheels 18x7.5 aluminum alloy Tires 275 / 65R18 General Grabber APT Brakes Front: ABS; Electronic Brake - force Distribution; 14.17 - inch vented disc Rear: ABS; Electronic Brake - force Distribution; 14.37 - inch vented disc 60 - 0 mph As Tested (ft): 109.5 Acceleration 0 - 60 mph As Tested (sec): 11.77 Weight (lb) Curb Weight: 7,240 Advertised GVWR: 8,990 Trailer Tow Capacity: 11,784 Mileage (mpg) EPA Estimate: N / A As Tested: 12.54 Dimensions (in) Wheelbase: 151 1/2 Overall Length: 245 1/2 Overall Width: 98 1/4 Overall Height: 78 Front, Rear Track: 69, 68 1/2 Front, Rear Overhang: 28, 32 1/4 Min.

(octane) / Capacity (gal): 87/12.7 SAE Peak Horsepower: 180 @ 6,400 rpm SAE Peak Torque (lb - ft): 175 @ 3,900 rpm Transmission Type: 9 - speed automatic Model 948TE Ratios: First: 4.71:1; Second: 2.84:1; Third: 1.91:1; Fourth: 1.38:1; Fifth: 1.00:1; Sixth: 0.81:1; Seventh: 0.70:1; Eighth: 0.58:1; Ninth: 0.48:1; Reverse: 3.80:1 Transfer Case Type: N / A Model: N / A Low - Range Ratio: 20:1 Axles Front Type: IFS Front Diff: PTU Hubs: Automatic Rear Type: IRS Rear Diff: RDM Ratio: 2.54:1 Traction Aid: Brake - based electronic traction control (front and rear) Suspension Front: McPherson strut Rear: Chapman strut Steering Type: Electric power - assisted rack - and - pinion Lock - to - Lock: 2.75 Turning Circle (ft): 35.3 Wheels 17x6.5 aluminum Tires P215 / 65R17 Goodyear Wrangler SRA Brakes Front: Vented rotor with single - piston floating caliper Rear: Solid rotor with single - piston floating caliper 60 - 0 mph As Tested (ft): 100 Acceleration 0 - 60 mph as tested (sec): 10.84 Weight (lb) Curb Weight: 3,600 Advertised GVWR: 4,586 Trailer Tow Capacity: 2,000 Mileage (mpg) EPA Estimate (city / hwy): 21/29 As Tested: 20.57 Dimensions (in) Wheelbase: 101 Overall Length: 165 3/4 Overall Width: 80 1/4 Overall Height: 68 7/8 Front, Rear Track: 61, 60 1/2 Front, Rear Overhang: 20 1/8, 17 3/4 Min.

Climbing Tambora is not recommended in the height of wet season and the peak may well be closed.

Mount Batur is although not the peak point of Bali but it is also elevated to a height of 1717 meters, which is not too short!

Because their model is insensitive to the small linear trends in GSL over the Common Era, the relative heights of the 300-1000 CE and 20th century peaks are not comparable.

The critical phrase seems to be «Because their model is insensitive to the small linear trends in GSL over the Common Era, the relative heights of the 300-1000 CE and 20th century peaks are not comparable.»

On the other hand, if the requirement is a validation of the underlying «peak production» principle (i.e. production from large resources maturing and going into decline, and not being sufficiently offset by newer smaller resources to maintain overall growth), and if we can accept some uncertainty around the date and height of the peak, then we have many examples of regions and countries in which exactly this process has occurred for oil and other resources.

The lower thermospheric temperatures, as a consequence of an unusually long minimum in solar extreme - ultraviolet flux, not only decreased density, but the contraction of the upper atmosphere also lowered the height of the peak of the ionospheric F - layer.

Setting the timing of emissions peaking alone without considering the trajectory of the emissions pathway — especially the height of the peak — may not be helpful in determining whether such measures go as far as the climate science requires.