Sentences with phrase «peak temperature record»

So am I right in assuming that the RSS data is likely to break the»98 peak temperature record sometime around April 2016?

Not exact matches

South African temperatures reached historic peaks and 2015 was the driest year since records began in 1904.
You just put in under your tongue and it will take your overall body temperature as well as record the safe and unsafe days, ovulation peak as well as due dates.
Mildrexler and his team focused on the annual maximum for each year as recorded by the Aqua satellite, which crosses the equator in the early afternoon as temperatures approach their daily peak.
The researchers found that due to warm spring temperatures on Kodiak, the berries were developing fruit weeks earlier, at the same time as the peak of the salmon migration; 2014 was one of the warmest years on the island since record - keeping began 60 years ago.
The succession of temperature records has also been accompanied by other notable climate records, including thebiggest ever year - to - year jump in carbon dioxide levels at the Mauna Loa observatory in Hawaii, as well as a record low winter Arctic sea ice peak.
It reached a peak earlier this year, when the UEA's Climatic Research Unit (CRU) turned down freedom of information (FOI) requests for its temperature records.
The searing heat even broke the all - time state temperature record for the month of June, with two locations — Chief Joseph Dam and Walla Walla — both hitting 113 °F on Sunday, when the event peaked, according to the National Weather Service office in Spokane.
Forecasters with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Columbia University said in their August update that temperatures in that region could reach more than 3.5 °F above normal when this event peaks in the winter, something only recorded three times in the 65 years of record - keeping, including the 1997 - 1998 event (as well as 1982 - 1983 and 1972 - 1973).
Figure 6: a) spectral power density periodogram of Vostok temperature - proxy records over the Holocene for 12,000 years showing six peaks.
Notice how difficult it is to correlate any of the the various peaks and troughs to the global temperature record.
The tiny scrap of data to which you refer are the satellite temperature records from 1978, which was the year of the global temperature trough following the previous peak in the 1940's.
Japan saw its all - time national record beaten when the temperature peaked at 41.0 °C (105.8 °F) at Shimanto on August 12th (see this blog post for details not only about the Japanese record but for the Chinese records as well).
There is a difference between peaks and valleys in noisy processes (1998 surface air temperature, 2007 record minimum ice, or shipping at a few small areas on the edges of the Arctic ocean) and CO2 forcing driven trends, especially when different measures.
I would suggest comparing peak to peak average temperature captures during weighted El - Nino events (during the time they occur, if they can be compared equally this would be a telling graph), instead of considering year to year records as a means of reducing ENSO effects on the temperature record, ENSO being largely a heat exchange between air and sea causing great changes in cloud distribution world wide.
Japanese Naval Records indicate a fleet navigated a completely ice - free Arctic Ocean at the peak of the Medieval Warm Period, so total melting is nothing new, however unlikely at current temperatures.
That coincided with the period of peak demand a very hot day (near record temperatures).
Easterbrook merely appended the UAH temperature record to very early 2009 from the peak of the 2008 El Nino.
If you have a global heat record in an ENSO neutral year (like 2017), that record is likely close to the actual underlying temperature trend (just like 2014)-- while the heat record of 2016 (El Niño dominated) is a peak superimposed on that trend.
Checking temperature records shows that June 1988 was indeed a warm peak, of the 1988 El Nino.
If you use HADCRUT temperature record for the Southern Hemisphere from 1850 it is possible to discern a peak in 1880, 60 years before the 1940 peak, and 120 years before 2000 when the infamous «global cooling» period, 2002 - 08, kicks in.
Anthropogenic warming in the post — war period was some 0.4 degrees K. 1944 and 1998 being the peaks of 2 successive 20 to 30 year warm Pacific Ocean regimes — as seen in both sea surface and surface temperature records.
David, referencing the latest updated Ed Hawkins graphic you've posted here, let's look at how graphical spin doctoring might be applied as it concerns a series of recurring peak temperature years, each of which might be factually described as «the hottest year on record
Anthropogenic warming in the post — war period was some 0.4 degrees K — 1944 and 1998 being the peaks of 2 successive 20 to 30 year Pacific Ocean regimes — as seen in surface temperature records.
«The mid-20th century temperature «bump» (peaking circa 1940) is an interesting feature of the temperature record.
Indeed, we point out specifically that the 1940s peak in the temperature record is not matched in the forced component of our simulations regardless of the solar forcing used.
The temperature record shows a peak of about 0.2 degr.C around 1942.
Based on the Vostok record, Earth should about now be stabilizing (briefly in geological terms) at an anomaly of about 3ºC ± 1ºC, the temperature of the preceding four peaks.
Maximum temperatures of 35 to 40 °C were repeatedly recorded and peak temperatures climbed well above 40 °C (André et al., 2004; Beniston and Díaz, 2004).
With 1998 either being the hottest or one of the hottest (dependent on which temperature record set one works with) years in recorded history, a constant refrain has been «there has been no warming since...» (or, for awhile, since 1998 was such a peak (aberration), «there has been cooling»).
Here are a couple of striking numbers from the data: in the decade from 2004 to 2013, worldwide climate - related deaths (including droughts, floods, extreme temperatures, wildfires, and storms) plummeted to a level 88.6 percent below that of the peak decade, 1930 to 1939.2 The year 2013, with 29,404 reported deaths, had 99.4 percent fewer climate - related deaths than the historic record year of 1932, which had 5,073,283 reported deaths for the same category.
I realise the AMO will also have been affected by solar input, but given the AMO varies by 2C or so in the longer term, and the residual calculated by Hathaway et al is only 0.5 C or so from peak to trough, it would seem that after allowing for the solar effect on the AMO there wouldn't be much room for any co2 warming effect in the Armagh temperature record after the calcs were done.
If tree - ring temperature reconstructions have the effect of ironing out peaks and valleys — and you seem to agree they do — then appending an instrument record that happens to correspond to a peak, will always yield a hockey stick shape.
The El Niño peak in 1998 and La Niña trough in 2008 in particular are much more evident in the satellite data sets than in the surface temperature record.
NASA revealed that temperatures last month peaked above the previous record set five years ago.
Over the last few summers, record temperatures have pushed the grid in Texas, the Mid-Atlantic and Northeast to its limits during peak times.
The satellite temps are more sensitive (higher swings) to ENSO and yearly variation than the surface temperatures, and the 5 - year average for 1982 (1979 - 1984) is one of the highest peaks above trend for the UAH record.
I recorded collector temperatures over the peak of the stagnation and also took some thermal camera pictures of the outside of the glazing and surrounding areas on the house.
Prior to this however we had an interesting and substantial «hump» peaking around 1730 that terminated the coldest period of the Little Ice age with an abrupt rise in temperature over several decades of some 1.9 C unequalled in the record before or since.
From a scientific point of view the exact execution and framing could be criticized on certain aspects (e.g. ECS is linearly extrapolated instead of logarithmically; the interpretation that recent record warmth are not peaks but rather a «correction to the trend line» depends strongly on the exact way the endpoints of the observed temperature are smoothed; the effect of non-CO2 greenhouse gases is excluded from the analysis and discussion), but the underlying point, that more warming is in store than we're currently seeing, is both valid and very important.
This collusion can be proved by the presence of shared, computer - generated noise peaks in their published temperature records they did not know of until I pointed them out publicly.
Just for one prominent example, when NOAA and / or NASA cite 2014 as being the hottest year on record, in a context of stating their official positions concerning climate change — as were 1998, 2005, and 2010 similarly cited — then for purposes of verifying the AR5 model ensemble, what they are really saying is that the trend of peak hottest years is what matters most to them as climate scientists, not the central trend of observed temperatures.
Examination of the temperature record over this period shows a slight cooling, peaking in 1992 - 1993, but these temperatures were certainly not â $ ˜unprecedentedâ $ ™, nor did they exceed the bounds of observed variability, yet it is well accepted that the cooling was attributable to the eruption.
California's record warmest year occurs at the peak of a sustained, long - term warming trend in the state over the past century or so — the same period over which the Earth's global mean temperature has risen by 1.5 ° F.
The observation that led to his conclusion was that in the ice core records during interglacials methane rises to a peak and then decreases as temperature rises and falls.
And 2016 may well provide an unprecedented third surface temperature record in a row, as the influence of the current super El Nino will likely peak in the first half of this year.
But the current uptick seems to peak around 1940 if we trust the recent temperature record and assume its comparable to the ice core data.
As a result of the high temperatures today, it is expected that the state's peak load will be 32,400 MWs, approaching the record set on July of 2013 of 33,955 MWs.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z