When a friend asked him the other day how it felt to own the most successful racing stable in 1959, he looked briefly but sharply at his questioner, then gave one of the rather
pedantic answers for which he is noted.
Quick and
pedantic answer is «no».
Not exact matches
Once we have
answered those questions, «thinking» becomes
pedantic and idle.
Again, whatever the technical
answer may be, a
pedantic interpretation wouldn't stand up in court?
I know my interpretation is
pedantic, but that is why I asked about simply not
answering questions asked by the officer, rather then playing the game by turning the question back on them.