Sentences with phrase «peer nominations»
Responding to the call for independent data in maternal depression research (Burt et al. 2005), separate informants were used to assess the four constructs in the model — maternal reports of their depressive symptomatology, observer ratings of the quality of mother - child interaction, teacher ratings of child emotion regulation, and peer nominations of child social preference.
https://link.springer.com/
Externalizing behavior (via parent and teacher ratings) was measured before the start of camp; peer preference and friendship quantity (via peer nominations) were measured in the middle of camp, and bully status and victim status (via peer nominations) were measured at the end of camp.
The number of peer nominations that each child receives for each role / item is tallied and converted to a z - score (M = 0, SD = 1) to adjust for differences in the possible number of nominations (i.e., unequal class sizes).
Children's (n = 671) aggression was assessed by peer nominations.
Peer nominations were also utilized to determine participants» aggressive reputations in both fall and spring.
We would like to add that future studies concerning bully behavior among peers could include peer nominations and / or observational measures.
ty, as well as peer nominations of gender nonconformity and victimization.
462 predominantly white, middle - class students from Grade 5 - 9 provided self - reports of victimization (physical, verbal, and relational) and gender nonconformity, as well as peer nominations of gender nonconformity and victimization.
Peer nominations of aggressive - disruptive behavior and one parent measure (the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children) yielded no significant differences between the two groups.
Peer acceptance, the number of mutual friends, and proximity to others were measured through peer nominations.
Bullying perpetration and victimization were assessed by peer nominations.
Correlational analysis showed a moderate / strong correspondence between peer nominations of young people identified as traditional bullies and cyberbullies.
Additionally, peer nominations of perceived popularity and malicious rumors were solicited and teachers rated girls» physical attractiveness and perceived popularity among boys and girls.
This selection process includes independent research, peer nominations and peer evaluations.
Adolescents» behaviour may vary from one context to another, or from one interaction partner to another, and informants» reports may be affected by their own perspectives.13 Because there is no gold standard for psychiatric disorders, and reports from different informants tend to correlate only moderately, using information from multiple informants seems the best strategy to chart mental health.14 Among other things, adherence to this first principle is expressed in the use of child (Youth Self - report; YSR), and parent (Child Behavior Checklist; CBCL) questionnaires on child / adolescent mental health, which are part of the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA), 15,16 and the use of a teacher - report (Teacher Checklist of Psychopathology), which was developed for TRAILS on the basis of the Achenbach Teachers Report Form.17 It is also expressed in the use of peer nominations to assess adolescents» social status at school.
The selection process includes independent research, peer nominations and peer evaluations.
Selection for the Super Lawyers list is through peer nominations and independent research and less than 2.5 per cent of eligible attorneys in the state of California achieve Rising Stars status.
Super Lawyers selects its winners through a thorough vetting process that begins with peer nominations.
The selection process usually involves independent research, peer nominations and industry recognition.
Through peer nominations John E. Brooks, Jeffrey E. Goodman, Craig S. Rix and Stephen J Shamie are named.
Selections are made by peer nominations of attorneys well regarded in the legal community, with many years of experience, and a distinguished record of achievement.
Top Law Firms are selected by peer nominations of firms with excellent credentials.
Peer nominations and evaluations are combined with third party research.
The selection process includes independent research, peer nominations and peer evaluations.»
How the process works: Peer nominations and evaluations are combined with independent research by Super Lawyers, which is part of the Thomson Reuters company.
Attorneys are selected using a rigorous, multiphase process that includes independent research, peer nominations and peer evaluations.
About Super Lawyers Super Lawyers selects attorneys using a rigorous, multiphase process that includes peer nominations and evaluations and independent research.
Attorneys are selected based on a rigorous, multi-phase rating process that includes peer nominations, evaluations and third party research.
The patented selection process includes independent research, peer nominations and peer evaluations.
The National Trial Lawyers conducts months of third - party research and peer nominations in order to select the highest qualified lawyers from every region and state from around the country.
Every year Super Lawyers selects attorneys using a patented selection process that involves peer nominations, independent research and peer evaluations.
This process includes peer nominations, evaluations and independent research.
The selection process for Super Lawyers has many steps and includes independent research, peer nominations and peer evaluations.
Therrian is among seven criminal defense attorneys on the Best Lawyers Under 40 list, selected from peer nominations and a review by a blue - ribbon panel of lawyers and D Magazine editors.
If an attorney does not meet the standards established by our criteria to be selected among the Top 100 in their community, then there is no amount of money (or peer nominations) that will change that.
«Super Lawyers» undergo a rigorous, multiphase process which combines peer nominations with third - party research.
This rating system involves a competitive selection process composed of peer nominations and evaluations.
Jim has consistently been listed in The Best Lawyers in America ® and has been selected for inclusion in Ohio Super Lawyers ® through a process that includes independent research, peer nominations and peer evaluations.
Our attorneys have consistently received accolades based on peer nominations and surveys, such as inclusion in Super Lawyers.
The Rising Stars selection process includes independent research, peer nominations and peer evaluations.
The multi-phased selection process includes independent research, peer nominations and peer evaluations, rating attorneys from more than 70 practice areas.
Selection is based on a thorough multi-phase objective and uniformly - applied process which includes peer nominations combined with third - party research.
As part of the selection process, peer nominations and evaluations are combined with third - party research.
Super Lawyers determines its lists through a patented process that involves peer nominations, independent research by Super Lawyers, and a thorough assessment from its highly qualified panel of attorneys.
Super Lawyers» competitive selection process includes independent research, peer nominations and peer evaluations.
«Super Lawyers Rising Stars» are selected by Law & Politics after a rigorous multi-phase selection process that includes peer nominations and evaluations and independent evaluation of candidates by the Law & Politics» attorney - led research staff.
Super Lawyers selects «Rising Star» attorneys using a patented multiphase selected process; peer nominations and evaluations are combined with independent research to identify the top 2.5 % of attorneys under 40 in the Southern California region.
Super Lawyers selects attorneys based on a multi-phase process, in which peer nominations and evaluations are combined with third party research.
independent research, peer nominations and peer evaluations.
The selection process has multiple phases, including independent research, peer nominations and peer evaluations.