Sentences with phrase «peer review officers»

But the people I really wanted to confront were those clinical investigators who signed their names to that VIGOR trial report, and the peer review officers and editors at NEJM, damn them.

As you, Bill, should realize, it is difficult for an honest peer review officer — even one who does not have a personal pecuniary or professional interest in the support of a particular point of view — to contest an assertion in a manuscript which is clearly supported by a previously peer - reviewed article, a copy of which has come to said review officer along with the manuscript in question, all highlighted and redlined «with circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one explaining what each one was to be used as evidence against us.»

Not exact matches

Previously, she was a program officer at the Research Support Program for USAID (administered under the Policy and Global Affairs Division at the National Academies) where she managed peer review and administration of USAID's Israeli research programs.

ASCB Executive Director Stefano Bertuzzi noted that in addition to shuttering experiments at the NIH campus in Bethesda, Maryland, the shutdown has canceled peer - review meetings and furloughed the 1300 NIH program officers who help scientists receive funding.

Last fall, CPRIT's chief scientific officer and many of its outside scientific reviewers resigned to protest what they saw as a failure to conduct proper peer review.

One - third of the program officers who manage peer review at NSF are actually still working for their home institution, typically a university.

Paul Peters, chief strategy officer at Hindawi, says the review time was within the normal range for the journal and that the paper «underwent the normal peer review process, which included external review by three independent peer reviewers.»

While ArborGen has released little in the way of peer - reviewed research so far, it will publish barnase results this year, said Maud Hinchee, ArborGen's chief technology officer.

Daniel Dennehy, chief operations officer at UK Essays, acknowledges that the free online help available elsewhere on the internet can often be badly researched, inaccurate and not peer reviewed.

Thanks to Erin Garratt and Margery Yeager at Chiefs for Change, Saroja Warner at the Council of Chief State School Officers, and their many members who contributed to this brief through peer review and feedback.

Brian has been involved with creating policies, models, and criteria for promoting validity, reliability, and credibility in both assessments and accountability systems through work with groups such as the U.S. Department of Education (co-author of Accountability Peer Review guidance; Growth Model Pilot guidance), Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO)(author of documents on the design of accountability systems and balanced assessment systems), National Center for Educational Outcomes (NCEO)(author of research reports on standardization and reliability for assessment systems for students with disabilities), and several state Technical Advisory Committees.

Monique M. Chism, the director of student achievement and accountability in the department's Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, shared the timeline for peer - assessment reviews with a gathering of state assessment directors on June 24, the first day of the Council of Chief State School Officers» annual student - assessment conference here, and with the CCSSO's state collaboratives on assessment and other topics.

Scott has published dozens of articles in peer - reviewed journals and edited volumes; he also regularly presents his work at the national conferences of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO).

One of the key findings in the case was that the county defined a pit bull based on appearance and this is «subjective criteria and there is little or no peer review» It also noted that Animal Control Officers could not be assumed experts in breed identification.

Anybody with an education in the sciences can tell when a credentialed charlatan is violating scientific method, «cherry - picking» data, manipulating computer simulations (climate models) to «draw the curve, then plot the points,» concealing his raw observational data sets from properly skeptical examiners, corrupting academic peer review (both to suppress the publication of colleagues» studies casting doubt upon the reviewing officers» pet hypotheses and to ensure that the submissions of «The Team» do not suffer impediments to publication), and concerting all these violations of professional ethical standards by way of back - room confabs and some of the most incredibly stupid e-mails this side of Enron's «Smartest Guys in the Room.»

[36] The court found that the University could properly protect «prepublication critical analysis, unpublished data, analysis, research, results, drafts, and commentary» as well as prepublication peer review work because the University was justified in concluding that, as is prohibited by Arizona law, «release of [the] information would have an important and harmful effect on the duties of a State agency or officer.»

Her research along with co-investigators Shannon Wanless, Applied Developmental Psychologist at University of Pittsburgh and Roger Weissberg, Distinguished Professor of Psychology and Education and Chief Knowledge Officer for the Collaborative for Academic, Social and Emotional Learning (CASEL) has been accepted through scientific peer review for publication in the Fall / Winter Issue of The School Community Journal.