These days, the hobby breeders are so few, that
their peers keep them in line.
Not exact matches
1) Ministry 2) Church attendance — where
peer pressure
keeps you
in line.
If hseneker were actually interested
in keeping up with the multiple
lines of
peer - reviewed evidence supporting the consensus of working climate scientists, he wouldn't be a denier, and he probably wouldn't have a blog.
How many
in the IPCC circles have towed the
line and
kept a low profile on
peer review abuse, data manipulations and defacto supported outlandish summary conclusions (goreism, mann, jones, hansen etc.) is a great shame of science.