In addition, the main thrust
of the report's criticism, that the state's ESSA plan is not sufficiently
similar to what it would have been had No Child Left Behind remained in effect, assumes the test - based accountability strategy that these reviewers have made their careers pursuing had been effective, which it has not; and therefore, when coupled with the false claim that California has high - quality academic
standards and assessments, which it doesn't (California's
standards being based on the Common Core, which leaves American students 2 - 3 years behind their
peers in East Asia and northern Europe), California's families remain well advised to opt out
of state schooling wherever and whenever possible, until the overreach from both the federal and state capitals is brought to an end and local schools that want to pursue genuinely world - class excellence can thrive.
I also should note that researchers in this study clearly conducted this study with
similar a priori conclusions in mind (i.e., that the Common Core should be saved / promoted); hence, future
peer review
of this piece may be out
of the question as the bias evident in the sets
of findings would certainly be a «methodological issue,» again, likely preventing a
peer - reviewed publication (see, for example, the a priori conclusion that «[this] study highlights an important advantage
of having a common set
of standards and assessments across multiple states,» in the abstract (p. 3).