Not exact matches
NHERI executes, evaluates, and disseminates studies and information (e.g., statistics, facts, data)
on homeschooling (i.e., home schooling, home - based education, home education, home school, home - schooling, unschooling, deschooling, a form of alternative education), publishes reports and the
peer - reviewed scholarly journal Home School Researcher, and serves in consulting, academic
achievement tests, and expert witness (in courts and legislatures).
Although the difference was slight, high - income children outperformed their less wealthy
peers on both IQ
tests and an exam designed to replicate
achievement in various academic subjects.
Yet physically active children tend to outperform their inactive
peers in the classroom and
on tests of
achievement.
In a quasi-experimental study in nine Title I schools, principals and teacher leaders used explicit protocols for leading grade - level learning teams, resulting in students outperforming their
peers in six matched schools
on standardized
achievement tests (Gallimore, Ermeling, Saunders, and Goldenberg, 2009).
What they saw was sobering but not surprising: Despite attempts to close
achievement gaps between students of color, immigrant students, and low - income students and their more affluent white
peers, wide disparities persisted in student performance
on state
tests, graduation rates, school attendance, and college - going rates.
The GRC compares academic
achievement in math and reading across all grades of student performance
on state
tests with average
achievement in a set of 25 other countries with developed economies that might be considered economic
peers of the U.S..
Recalling that black students have the lowest scores
on both the reading and math
tests, one can see that these results can be interpreted as the effects of
peer achievement.
For example, a student who begins the year at the 50th percentile
on the state reading and math
test and is assigned to a teacher in the top quartile in terms of overall TES scores will perform
on average, by the end of the school year, three percentile points higher in reading and two points higher in math than a
peer who began the year at the same
achievement level but was assigned to a bottom - quartile teacher.
As a group, Hispanics perform well below average
on national
achievement tests, and their high school dropout rate is nearly four times that of their non-Hispanic white
peers.
New Jersey measures growth for an individual student by comparing the change in his or her
achievement on the state standardized assessment from one year to the student's «academic
peers» (all other students in the state who had similar historical
test results).
Another intervention, Cognitive Acceleration for Science Education (CASE), which targets «general thinking skills,» enabled British schoolchildren to outperform their
peers even two years later
on achievement tests in science, math, and English.
Maryland's public school students made greater gains
on a national standardized
test than their
peers in nearly every other state, although the
achievement gap between white and minority students persists.
We study ability
peer effects in English secondary schools using data
on four cohorts of pupils taking age14 national
tests and measuring
peers» ability by prior
achievements at age - 11.
Test - based student
achievement measures show that,
on average, charter schools perform just about as well as their
peers in traditional public schools.
In a study of students selected not
on IQ but
on mathematical or verbal aptitude, Dauber and Benbow (199012) compared the popularity,
peer acceptance and
peer interaction of extremely gifted students who had scored 700 or more
on the Scholastic Aptitude
Test (Mathematical) or 630 or more on the Scholastic Aptitude Test (Verbal) before age 13 (an achievement placing them at the top 1 in 10,000 among their age - peers) with those of moderately gifted students who scored at the 97th percentile on a grade - level math or verbal achievement t
Test (Mathematical) or 630 or more
on the Scholastic Aptitude
Test (Verbal) before age 13 (an achievement placing them at the top 1 in 10,000 among their age - peers) with those of moderately gifted students who scored at the 97th percentile on a grade - level math or verbal achievement t
Test (Verbal) before age 13 (an
achievement placing them at the top 1 in 10,000 among their age -
peers) with those of moderately gifted students who scored at the 97th percentile
on a grade - level math or verbal
achievement testtest.
Florida had the seventh smallest
achievement gap between low - income students and their
peers on the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress reading
tests for fourth - and eighth - graders.
Today, New Orleans students are closing the
achievement gap with their
peers, graduation rates have dramatically increased accompanied by major boosts in
achievement tests, and students are going
on to college.
School age children who received such nutrients over the course of a year behaved better (meaning they gave teachers more «
on task time») and scored higher
on achievement tests than their
peers who just received placebos.
Many observers (see, for example, Anson et al. 1991, Becker and Hedges 1992, Haynes et al. 1992, Joyner 1990, and Comer 1988) have found that students improve in a whole range of areas — self - efficacy, relationships with
peers and adults, general mental health,
achievement on standardized
tests, and classroom grades.
As a group, these largely Hispanic students have persistently scored significantly lower than their white
peers on standardized
tests like the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), known as the nation's report card, despite increased attention to this «
achievement gap.»
For example, in one study, neglected children had a smaller corpus callosum relative to control and comparison groups.8 Compared to their non-maltreated
peers, children in another study who experienced emotional neglect early in life performed significantly worse
on achievement testing during the first six years of schooling.9 Furthermore, although both abused and neglected children performed poorly academically, neglected children experienced greater academic deficits relative to abused children.10 These cognitive deficiencies also appear to be long lasting.
Weissberg and his colleagues recently completed an analysis of 300 scientific studies and reached two important conclusions: Students enrolled in such programs scored at least 10 percentage points higher
on achievement tests than
peers who weren't.
In another study, observations of
peer victimization during class time predicted restricted growth within one academic year
on students» state - based standardized reading
achievement test scores, after statistical control of their previous reading
achievement test scores, ADHD symptom severity, and ability grouping (i.e., tracking) in their classroom [30].