Not exact matches
They are reported to prefer and lean toward companies that produce goods and services that have real rather
than perceived value, and they more readily rely on the
opinions and recommendations of their
peers when making a purchasing decision.
Also bearing in mind that at least in my
opinion it is more the personality of the siblings
than age spacing that determines closeness and new studies have suggested that siblings teach compassion and bounderies way better because they have a
peer.
My only concern with climatedebatedaily is that no attempt is made to differentiate
peer reviewed science from a wide range of
opinion pieces, leaving the reader with the impression that mainstream science is far less resolved on the climate change issue
than is actually the case.
John Fensterwald, EdSource California teachers, more
than peers in other states, feel empowered to voice their
opinions and say they have influence over decisions and policies in their schools.
They may look for sensation, take dangerous risks, value their
peers»
opinions more
than an adult's and disengage from their learning.
It's the best way to hear their stories,
opinions and recommendations as
peers, rather
than hired help.
A responsible skeptic will request that you remain open minded to
opinions from both sides, and consider the uncertainties involved * without * prejudging them based on the demonstrable human predilection toward a «herd mentality» — by «herd mentality», I mean that once a consensus is formed, a flock of «me too» science papers become much more easily accepted, by
peer review journals,
than the skeptics» papers.
While the articles are a bit more serious
than most
opinion articles, they are not the same as a
peer - reviewed research article.
The way to maintain control is to make a point of sending our most newsworthy scientific articles and
opinion pieces to the journals of our own professional societies, in which the
peer review process is editor - facilitated, rather
than editor - directed.
Rather
than publishing uninformed
opinion pieces in the Murdoch media, if Happer thinks his climate - related
opinions are correct, perhaps he should subjugate them to the
peer - review process to see if they can withstand scrutiny.
In my
opinion, the philosophy and attitudes expressed here — concerns about potential critics being on «the scent» — and the associated conduct — withholding adverse information about verification r ^ 2 statistics and big misses — are far more repugnant
than revealing the identity of a
peer reviewer.
Peer review, in my
opinion, has been elevated to a higher standard
than it really should represent.
After all, just not buying something, whether because of a formal boycott or simply because of your personal
opinions about the product, is one way to exercise the power of your wallet, but sharing the reasons you do so with your
peers and the public at large could have a lot more impact
than simply avoiding the purchase.
We know that the teenage brain is wired to care about the
opinion of its
peers more
than it cares about almost anything else.