I don't self - identify with your somewhat
pejorative description a «brown man» - and I reject the idea that these issues are of specific and segmented interest.
Paul's highly
pejorative description of homosexual practice in Romans 1:24 - 27 — «dishonorable» or «degrading,» «contrary to nature,» an «indecency» or «shameful / obscene behavior,» and a fit «payback» for straying from God — suggests that Paul regarded homosexual practice as an especially serious infraction of God's will, in line with all Jewish perspectives of the time.
In the course of litigation the Plaintiff had an outburst that» involved the use of expletives, and
pejorative descriptions of the court, which this Court described as «an obscene diatribe and bizarre behaviour».
Not exact matches
If you'd prefer a different
description of that position, because you find «sectarian»
pejorative, then let's describe it as a position based on the argument that there's a need to promote the asserted interests of some differentiated groups over the interest of other differentiated groups on the basis that the former are inadequately represented in Canadian society.