To issue a new recommendation, the USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the accuracy, benefits, and potential harms of performing screening
pelvic examinations in asymptomatic, nonpregnant adult women 18 years and older who are not at increased risk for any specific gynecologic condition.
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) has concluded that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of performing screening
pelvic examinations in asymptomatic, nonpregnant adult women for the early detection and treatment of a range of gynecologic conditions.
Although the pelvic examination is a common part of the physical examination, it is unclear whether performing screening
pelvic examinations in asymptomatic women reduces the risk of illness or death.
ACP's new evidence - based clinical practice guideline, «Screening
Pelvic Examination in Adult Women,» was published today in Annals of Internal Medicine, ACP's flagship journal.
Not exact matches
She must return a third time for the ingestion of the second drug (misoprostol, used both
in RU - 486 and the new «abortion cocktail»), whereupon she is subjected to a second
pelvic examination as well as to an elaborate mix of blood tests.
In the Pre-conception stage, this may include: Discussion surrounding your cycle, when best to attempt to conceive, we may draw blood to check your baseline health, perform both physical and
pelvic examinations, and review nutrition and exercise guidance.
In an editorial also published in the July 1 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine, Dr. George Sawaya and Dr. Vanessa Jacoby of the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences at the University of California, San Francisco write, «The pelvic examination has held a prominent place in women's health for many decades and has come to be more of a ritual than an evidence - based practice... With the current state of evidence, clinicians who continue to offer the examination should at least be cognizant about the uncertainty of its benefits and its potential to cause harm through false - positive testing and the cascade of events it prompts.&raqu
In an editorial also published
in the July 1 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine, Dr. George Sawaya and Dr. Vanessa Jacoby of the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences at the University of California, San Francisco write, «The pelvic examination has held a prominent place in women's health for many decades and has come to be more of a ritual than an evidence - based practice... With the current state of evidence, clinicians who continue to offer the examination should at least be cognizant about the uncertainty of its benefits and its potential to cause harm through false - positive testing and the cascade of events it prompts.&raqu
in the July 1 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine, Dr. George Sawaya and Dr. Vanessa Jacoby of the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences at the University of California, San Francisco write, «The
pelvic examination has held a prominent place
in women's health for many decades and has come to be more of a ritual than an evidence - based practice... With the current state of evidence, clinicians who continue to offer the examination should at least be cognizant about the uncertainty of its benefits and its potential to cause harm through false - positive testing and the cascade of events it prompts.&raqu
in women's health for many decades and has come to be more of a ritual than an evidence - based practice... With the current state of evidence, clinicians who continue to offer the
examination should at least be cognizant about the uncertainty of its benefits and its potential to cause harm through false - positive testing and the cascade of events it prompts.»
Very few studies on screening for other gynecologic conditions with
pelvic examination alone have been conducted, and the USPSTF found that these studies have limited generalizability to the current population of asymptomatic women seen
in primary care settings
in the United States.
Overall, the USPSTF found inadequate evidence on screening
pelvic examinations for the early detection and treatment of a range of gynecologic conditions
in asymptomatic, nonpregnant adult women.
Externally, she looked like she was
in great shape, but when I completed a
pelvic floor muscle
examination I found that her
pelvic floor was weak and uncoordinated and that she was suffering from significant uterine prolapse.
If everyone has tenderness
in their
pelvic floor muscles, then would it really matter if I found it on an
examination?
At his 3 - week recheck
examination, Gray remained paraplegic with no sensation
in his
pelvic limbs or tail.
His physical
examination showed marked lameness
in his
pelvic limbs and an unwillingness to bear weight.