The sentence imposed in your case exceeds the maximum allowable
penalty for the crime of which you were convicted;
Not exact matches
There are a lot
of people who are opposed to the death
penalty not because they think no one ever deserves to die
for their
crimes, but because they think the government shouldn't have the power to hand out such a punishment, even when that punishment is justified.
Experts also say that tougher
penalties for and more prosecution
of inside hackers would also be a disincentive
for such
crimes.
The
penalty for the alleged
crime: a prison term
of as many as eight years.
By the middle
of the 19th century, notes Banner, the death
penalty had been removed from «
crime after
crime until none
of the northern states used it
for any offense other than murder.»
A bill in the Senate
of the Philippines would increase the
penalty for crimes that involve virtual currency.
SB1694 was announced in a March 13 press release, which relates that if the bill passes,
crimes committed «through and with the use
of virtual currency, will have a
penalty that is one degree higher than what is provided
for» by the Revised Penal Code.
In 2014, Florida Statute 825.103 «Exploitation
of an elderly person or disabled adult» became effective, which makes it easier
for authorities to prosecute persons who exploit elders and increases
penalties for crimes committed against elders.
On Saturday, Broward County State Attorney Michael Satz described the
crime as «the type
of case the death
penalty was designed
for.»
The next round
of trade sanctions will likely focus entirely on China, and be levied under section 301
of the Trade Act
of 1974
for penalties of IP theft and technological
crimes.
The Enrollment Program also authorizes a superior court to have jurisdiction over enrollees by allowing it to «appoint a receiver, monitor, conservator, or other designated fiduciary or officer
of the court
for a defendant or the defendant's assets,» as well as authorizes the Commissioner
of Business Oversight to «include in civil actions claims
for ancillary relief, including restitution and disgorgement, on behalf
of a person injured, as well as attorney's fees and costs, and civil
penalties of up to $ 25,000»
for up to four years after the purported violation occurred and «refer evidence regarding violations
of the bill's provisions to the Attorney General, the Financial
Crimes Enforcement Network
of the United States Department
of the Treasury, or the district attorney
of the county in which the violation occurred, who would be authorized, with or without this type
of a reference, to institute appropriate proceedings.»
Someone should explain to the sales people
of this product that the
penalty for white collar
crime in China is pretty expedient... it's called Execution.
The Financial
Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), working in coordination with the U.S. Attorney's Office
for the Northern District
of California (USAO - NDCA), assessed a $ 700,000 civil money
penalty recently against Ripple Labs Inc. and its whollyowned subsidiary, XRP II, LLC (formerly known as XRP Fund II, LLC).
If someone is guilty
of a
crime in this litany
of «neithers» they should or should have been penalized as the law dictates to include jail terms
for pedophiliacs (priests, rabbis, evangelicals, boy scout leaders, married men / women), divorce
for adultery (Clinton, Kennedy, Woods), jail terms
for obstruction
of justice) Clinton, Cardinal Law), jail
for embellizing / money laundering (the topic rabbi) and the death
penalty or life in prison
for murder («Kings David and Henry VIII).
At least all we have to do to avoid the ultimate
penalty is to accept Christ and believe in his sacrificial atonement, however, we still have to suffer on earth
for humanity
crime in the garden
of eden.
Considering the history
of conflicts between Church and State, it would seem more prudent
for Christians, Jews, and others
of good will to take the position that the death
penalty is justified as long as it is carried out by a lawful sovereign, not inflicted in a cruel and unusual manner, and imposed only on those convicted
of heinous
crimes by due process
of law.
When we have the death
penalty for child molesters and those that help hide their
crimes we will finally have something closer to true justice
for the destruction
of the lives
of their victims.
In the Middle Ages a number
of canonists teach that ecclesiastical courts should refrain from the death
penalty and that civil courts should impose it only
for major
crimes.
For example, North Carolina used the death
penalty to assist with the maintenance
of slavery; slave - stealing and inciting slaves to insurrection were capital
crimes.
It is love to obey God, and by having a swift death
penalty we love the people in our society [many
of whom are our enemies also] and offer them the best chance
for a life free from fear and
crime.
Sandusky will probably die in jail
for his
crimes, those that covered up
for him were disgraced, Paterno, and the insti.tution suffered
penalties and a loss
of reputation.
In our time, we have a legal / moral concept that the
penalty for a
crime must be proportional to the severity
of the
crime.
If someone is guilty
of a
crime in this litany
of «neithers» they should or should have been penalized as the law dictates to include jail terms
for pe - dophiliacs (priests, rabbis, evangelicals, boy scout leaders, married men / women), divorce
for adultery (Clinton, Kennedy, Woods), jail terms
for obstruction
of justice (Clinton, Cardinal Law) and the death
penalty or life in prison
for murder («Kings David and Henry VIII).
(CNN)- The death
penalty has been part
of human society
for millennia, understood to be the ultimate punishment
for the most serious
crimes.
Even in those structures
of justice aiming to be completely impartial — the apprehension
of lawbreakers and the affixing
of penalties for crime — the best jurisprudence takes into account the maturity and the motive
of the offender and the possibilities
of remedial as well as
of punitive treatment.
If someone is guilty
of a
crime in this litany
of «neithers» they should or should have been penalized as the law dictates to include jail terms
for pedop - hiliacs (priests, rabbis, evangelicals, boy scout leaders, imams, married men / women), divorce
for ad - ultery (Clinton, Kennedy, Woods), jail terms
for obstruction
of justice (Clinton, Cardinal Law) and the death
penalty or life in prison
for mur - der («Kings David and Henry VIII).
If someone is guilty
of a
crime in this litany
of «neithers» they should or should have been penalized / «stoned» as the law dictates to include jail terms
for pedophiliacs (priests, rabbis, evangelicals, boy scout leaders, married men / women), divorce
for adultery (Clinton, Kennedy, Woods), jail terms
for obstruction
of justice (Clinton, Cardinal Law, archbishop Brady) and the death
penalty or life in prison
for murder («Kings David and Henry VIII).
I was told Jesus claimed to be God in the flesh (John 1:14 n Phil 2:5 ff; et al.) I was told that in about 30AD Jesus let himself be executed
for a
crime he did not commit as a way
of satisfying Justice
for all our injustices — like one who pays a
penalty owed by another.
Death is prescribed as the punishment
for a host
of crimes including murder, treason, kidnapping, idolatry, blasphemy, false prophecy, witchcraft, breaking the Sabbath, rape, adultery, incest, perversion, uttering a curse, striking a parent, bearing false witness in a death
penalty trial.
When the
crime of rape and child molestation is commited — what should be the
penalty for this
crime?
Categorical remission
of the
penalty for all whose
crimes deserve death contradicts revealed teaching on the duty
of the magistrate and has no warrant in Christian tradition.
We are in danger
of another 9/11 attack (but death
penalty to Beck
for crimes against humanity).
If someone is guilty
of a
crime in this litany
of «neithers» they should or should have been penalized as the law dictates to include jail terms
for pedophiliacs (priests, rabbis, evangelicals, boy scout leaders, married men / women), divorce
for adultery (Clinton, Kennedy, Woods), jail terms
for obstruction
of justice (Clinton, Cardinal Law) and the death
penalty or life in prison
for murder («Kings David and Henry VIII).
I turned intentionally to a life
of crime at age twelve and found myself facing the death
penalty at age twenty
for offenses including conspiracies to commit bank robberies, hijackings, and homicide, and then, after a merciful and undeserved reprieve from God, spent ten years in America's worst prison trying to figure out, among other things, the nature
of punishment — and «Saving Punishment» by Stephen Webb is certainly the best meditation I've come across on the subject.
Although statutes still in effect in some states permit the death
penalty to be imposed
for a variety
of offenses — ranging from statutory rape to desecration
of a grave to causing death in a duel — murder is virtually the only
crime for which it has been recently employed.
That is the point
of what Mr. Robertson says (and don't think it pleasures me any to admit the man has ANY good point to present)-- that the
penalty way outweighs the
crime for the casual user.
If someone is guilty
of a
crime in this litany
of «neithers» they should or should have been penalized as the law dictates to include jail terms
for pedophiliacs (priests, rabbis, evangelicals, boy scout leaders, married men / women, football coaches), divorce
for adultery (Clinton, Kennedy, Woods), jail terms
for obstruction
of justice (Paterno et al Clinton, Cardinal Law) or child endangerment (Paterno in abstentia, Sandusky et al, Lynn) and the death
penalty or life in prison
for murder («Kings David and Henry VIII).
Google «
crime rate in Singapore»
for an example
of the deterrent effects
of the death
penalty.
Pre-trial intervention is not unusual
for first - time and non-violent offenders — with good representation, anyway — and can be compared to deferred prosecution, as both paths allow those accused
of crimes to pay lesser
penalties and avoid convictions and incarceration while satisfying other conditions asked
for by prosecutors and set by courts.
Could it be that they all dared to strike goals outside
of the
penalty area,
for which
crime they were permanently put on the naughty bench?
Busting gambling rings is labor - intensive work
for law - enforcement agencies, and there's little chance that those apprehended and found guilty will receive heavy
penalties since much
of the public considers gambling a victimless
crime.
There are severe
penalties for these kinds
of violent
crimes, and we should not reverse them without deliberation and with the stroke
of a pen.»
... subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or
penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests
of national security, territorial integrity or public safety,
for the prevention
of disorder or
crime,
for the protection
of health or morals,...
«In his prior political offices, Eliot Spitzer brought junk lawsuits which seldom held up in court against New York's leading industries
for his own political gain, to the detriment
of the citizens
of New York; he misused the powers
of his offices to «steamroll» legitimate political opposition, and acted with calculated hypocrisy, signing tougher
penalties into law
for the very
crimes he was committing.
A second, briefer but more striking example: Anglicans have been consistently most in favour
of the death
penalty, 61 % agreeing or agreeing strongly that «
for some
crimes, the death
penalty is the most appropriate sentence» in 2012, down from 68 % in 2005.
The
penalty for this
crime would largely be a matter
of politics - how far is the legislature willing to push?
He's also in favor
of increasing the
penalties for those who commit gun related
crimes and those who shoot first responders.
Article 316 bis second:
Crimes of thefts from used materials and tools or those provided
for use in the telecommunications, power generating and connecting, water, or sanitary drainage utilities that are established by the government, public authorities or organizations, or the public sector units, or those licensed or establishment as a public utility, shall be punished
for with the
penalty of imprisonment, if no aggravating condition
of those prescribed in Articles 313 to 316 is fulfilled.
Article 316 bis third: A
penalty of detention
for a period
of not less than six months and not exceeding seven years, shall be inflicted
for the following
crimes:
«Hate
crimes is something that we've always looked seriously at, but the increasing
of penalties for certain classes, we've started to have problems with that, because we don't want to make it seem like one person's life or the
crime that happens to them should have a stiffer
penalty than say you or I. So, those have been some
of the challenges that we've had.