Sentences with phrase «penalty for one's sins»

The death penalty for sin is not only the death of the body but eternal separation from the creator.

You believe that He paid the entire penalty for your sin.

Discipleship to Jesus, therefore, while it saved men from lower orders of suffering, such as penalty for sin, called men to the higher order of self - sacrifice.

Though He may discipline you, He does not judge you, for the true penalty for sin has been born by Jesus upon the cross.

My question is: If Jesus did not endure a period of separation from the Father, as the actual penalty for sin, than why else would he go through all that torture and shame, and death?

The cross was worn as a symbol of dedication, and plenary indulgence — that is, remission of the temporal penalties for sin — was promised to those who engaged in the enterprise with singleness of heart.

AND THAT WHEN WE DO sin we have an Advocate — Jesus Christ — who took the penalty for sin so that when our bodies do die, OUR SPIRIT can move into ETERNITY with God.

If the penalty for sinning against your fake god is death, then when we die we are all paid up and no longer sinners.

He died on the cross paying the penalty for my sins.

There must be a penalty for sin, just like there is a penalty for crime.

That man was a sinner and could never earn his way into heaven but that Jesus died to pay the penalty for my sin and that I just needed to transfer my trust from myself to Jesus Christ alone.

Jesus paid the penalty for our sins so we as sinners could be forgiven.

Those who trust in Jesus as their personal Savior will be with God for eternity Those who reject God's gift will be judged, and have to pay the penalty for their sins.

After all, what was the penalty for sin in the original created order?

The basic message of the Gospel is that God loved humanity so much that He sent Jesus to Earth to pay the penalty for our sins, resurrect, and now advocate on our behalf.

His ministry was awesome, but far more reaching was His death on the cross to pay the penalty for our sins.

In the New Testament death is sometimes represented as the penalty for sin, or it becomes the symbol for separation from God, and thus Christ's victory over sin is also the victory over death.

But what is special about the death and resurrection if we don't know about Jesus being God, or about God being holy, or about our own sinfulness, or about death being the penalty for sin... and on and on it goes.

God assumes culpability, blame and penalty for sin, not because God commits sin — but for God's own sake (Is 43.25 and 48.9 — 11).

He lived a sinless life and then died on the cross to pay the penalty for our sins.

Romans 3:21 - 26 makes it clear that Jesus indeed paid the penalty for our sin by being the blood sacrifice for our atonement.

Only because of what Jesus Christ did for me by paying the penalty for my sins, by his death on the cross.

The Old Testament prophets predict Jesus» life (the coming of the Messiah, someone to take the penalty for our sin).

God sent Jesus to pay the penalty for our sin.

I could go on and on about this, but here's the point: There are numerous flaws with the idea that the death of Jesus paid the penalty for our sins or satisfied the wrath of God.

Instead, we tend to think of the Sermon on the Mount and the stories of the gospels as interesting backstory to Jesus» march to the cross, where the penalty for our sins was paid in full.

Jesus went willingly to the cross, not because a blood sacrifice was necessary to pay the penalty for sin, but because going to the cross unmasked the scapegoat mechanism, revealed the violence inherent within the heart of men, exposed the myth of redemptive violence, and brought an end to the war that men had waged on God for centuries.

Through his death, he paid the penalty for our sin.

By paying the penalty for sin he made peace between God and sinful humankind.

The article also says ``... Jesus went willingly to the cross, not because a blood sacrifice was necessary to pay the penalty for sin, but because going to the cross unmasked the scapegoat mechanism, revealed the violence inherent within the heart...»

I mean, once He died, He had fully paid the penalty for the sins of all mankind.

They do not know that they actually have to stop sinning in thought, word, and deed, which is accomplished by the indwelling Christ, and that only the blood of christ can wash away the penalty for sin, that their own works have no merit for themselves or anyone else.

First, my understanding, following that of the historic church, is that Jesus Christ paid the penalty for sin for all those who are in Christ.

Well, in Jesus Christ... that He was / is God and that He paid the penalty for our sins for us on the cross... that He died and rose again, defeating death.

There have been held in Christian history various views of the atonement that are not very satisfactory: that Christ's death was a ransom paid to the devil, that he had to die to propitiate the wrath of God or to uphold God's authority, that he is our substitute in paying the penalty for sin — or along another line, that his death was simply a good moral influence and example to us.

I don't think the resurrection first and foremost proves that Jesus paid the penalty for sin.

However, You who seek to normalize sin... If you take away the penalties for one sin, you take away the penalty for all sin.

There will be a penalty for sin, either we pay the penalty ourselves or we depend on Jesus to pay it in our stead.

We all are sinners, born that way, and we'll die that way... but our redemption is found in Christ, He pays the penalty for our sin and through our faith in Him we can be sinless in God's eyes...