Sentences with phrase «pension plans were considered»

The above quote said that «South Carolina's pension plans were considered 99 percent funded in 1999.»

South Carolina's pension plans were considered 99 percent funded in 1999, and on track to pay all promised benefits for decades to come.

Not exact matches

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.

If that situation sounds familiar, consider an increasingly popular way to maximize your retirement savings: stacking what's called a cash - balance pension on top of your company's profit - sharing 401 (k) plan.

As regulation takes shape and new investment vehicles pop up, pension plans and endowments are considering crypto assets.

In his meeting with provincial finance ministers on possible reforms to the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) in December, Minister Flaherty indicated that global economic growth was too uncertain and that the domestic economy was too fragile to consider structural changes to the CPP at this time.

DOL is proposing to update the Employee Retirement Income Security Act by instituting a safe harbor describing circumstances in which a payroll deduction savings program, including one with automatic enrollment, would not be considered an employee pension benefit plan under ERISA.

In a press release issued on December 8th, the Minister of State for Finance Kevin Sorenson argued that now is not the time to consider provincial proposals to enhance the Canada Pension Plan (CPP), given the fragile nature of the current economic recovery.

However, before making a decision, consider that a pension can be a great source of guaranteed income in retirement and should not be dismissed unless you have a specific plan for generating enough income without the pension payments.

And if you're depending on pension income to carry you through retirement, it's time to consider a Plan B.

Well, considering that most federal, state and local pensions are VASTLY underfunded AND consistently fail to meet their investment targets, it seems pretty obvious that Plan A for retirement isn't going to work out.

Their returns are shown gross of fees, so that's something to consider as well, but they only charge 0.25 % to the pension plan because they're such a large client (another aspect of their approach I have great deal of respect for).

For the long term, New York needs to consider alternative approaches for public sector pensions, and adopt plans more comparable to what is typically provided in the private sector.

• James Hall in the Daily Telegraph says the government is considering a plan to allow people to protect their pension savings from falls in the value of the stock market.

«Should we find it necessary to consider a retirement incentive plan, we must also ensure that it is carefully crafted to make long - term structural reforms to ensure that our pensions and budgets are sustainable going forward.»

Nearly 1.3 m «silver strivers» — those working beyond the state pension age — would have to start paying national insurance to prop up the social care system, under plans being considered by the government.

Teachers generally accept lower base salaries in exchange for future pension benefits, and the plans are funded in part through contributions that are considered part of their pay packages.

The other factor to consider is the funding status of teacher pension plans.

Even in 2011, Governor Chris Christie (R - NJ) considers the state's contributions to its pension plan an optional expense.

The total pension income is a combination of all of these pensions, so all should be considered when a teacher thinks about their retirement planning.

Those ideas are not popular with Republican lawmakers, who control both chambers of the state legislature and want to cut costs by overhauling public pension plans before considering new taxes.

Every pension account in which the contributor is in a marriage or common - law relationship at the time of retirement is considered a joint pension plan.

When transferring longevity risk for a given pension plan or insurer, there are two primary factors to consider: current levels of mortality, which are observable but vary substantially across socio - economic and health categories, and longevity trend risk, which is systematic in nature as it applies to populations.

Contribution to annuity plan of LIC (Life Insurance Corporation of India) or any other Life Insurance Company for receiving pension from the fund is considered for tax benefit.

People with DB plans who are considering early retirement should read their pension booklet to find out how much their monthly income will be reduced as a result.

Also, some states are considering one of the «dumbest ideas ever» — pension bonds (borrowing to fund pension plans, relying on clever investing to beat the rate paid on the bonds).

The Canada Pension Plan is currently fully funded for the next 70 years, even when you consider our aging population.

Some other options to consider might be plans for continuing education, how volatile your career is during changing economic conditions, family planning, as well as your need to take on market risks due to other income sources such as pensions.

You're not going to be happy about this, but it's your only option: When doing your retirement planning, consider underweighting any pension payments you expect to receive, especially if yours is underfunded.

This is important for everyone and not just people who do not have a workplace pension, particularly when you consider how many pension plans have gone bust over the years and left people ruined after a lifetime of toil.

The Canada Pension Plan (CPP) is an important income source for retirees and should be considered when planning for retirement.

* 1 lakh (post marriage trips) and * Considering contingency plan (30000 * 12) = 3.6 lac is out of that corpus * left with 3.5 odd something (which is into EPF + NSE + Life stage pension ICICI pru..

Tax tip: If your net income is over the $ 73,756 clawback threshold and your spouse or common - law partner's net income is below it, consider splitting your pension income (see topic 71) or splitting your Canada Pension Plan (CPP) benefits with him or her if that will bring your net income below the threshold (see topipension income (see topic 71) or splitting your Canada Pension Plan (CPP) benefits with him or her if that will bring your net income below the threshold (see topiPension Plan (CPP) benefits with him or her if that will bring your net income below the threshold (see topic 112).

Q: I am considering retiring early (at 55) and based on advice from my financial planner, I can rather easily do so, primarily based on our assets, lack of any debt, and my wife's existing defined benefit pension plan.

For a defined contribution pension plan to be considered comparable, you have to be contributing 8 % annually and your employer must match 50 % of this minimum rate.

To be exempt from the ORPP, you must have what the Wynne government considers a comparable workplace pension plan.

I suppose you could say that it is indirectly reduced by income tax payable on your pension, so planning when to take CPP, RRSP / RRIF withdrawals and company pensions should be considered so you can pay the least tax possible.

We do have pensions, but we consider them gravy and don't plan our retirement on them being present since that is the most conservative route.

But, if you're a member of a pension plan, consider this: Your pension plan is not guaranteed.

Pension plan members in the private sector need to at least consider the risk of their company being able to fund their pension payments for life if they have the opportunity to commute their pension and otherwise take a lump - sum payout upon leaving thPension plan members in the private sector need to at least consider the risk of their company being able to fund their pension payments for life if they have the opportunity to commute their pension and otherwise take a lump - sum payout upon leaving thpension payments for life if they have the opportunity to commute their pension and otherwise take a lump - sum payout upon leaving thpension and otherwise take a lump - sum payout upon leaving the plan.

Before you set up a transition to retirement pension, you need to consider if this type of income stream is right for you and how it fits with your work and super plans.

Pension plans are often considered an integral part of retirement planning.

Dropping interest rates and rising liability values in the late 1990s now have pension plan sponsors considering raising their fixed income weightings to «match» their liabilities which are valued entirely in Canadian currency and interest rates.

As he outlines in Pensionize Your Nest Egg, Milevsky has always emphasized the distinction between what he calls «real» pensions (guaranteed - for - life Defined Benefit pensions) and capital - appreciation vehicles like RRSPs or Defined Contribution plans, which have to be «pensionized» (or «annuitized») before they can be considered to be «real» pensions.

For the small number of seniors considered low income who receive an average of $ 3,610 from the Canada Pension Plan each year, enhancements to the national pension may not be beneficial, according to a new study from the Fraser InsPension Plan each year, enhancements to the national pension may not be beneficial, according to a new study from the Fraser Inspension may not be beneficial, according to a new study from the Fraser Institute.

Union miners are among the 10.4 million Americans with retirements tied to multiemployer pension plans, the large investment pools considered low risk because they don't rely on a single company for financing.

It's important to consider all of your potential sources for retirement income, including any employer - sponsored plans you may participate in, Social Security, and any pension benefits that may be applicable.

While I used the common example of a spouse with a large DB pension, employer - sponsored Defined Contribution (DC) plans are also considered eligible pension income for pension splitting purposes.

Balances held in Chase Money Purchase Pension and Profit Sharing Plans are not factored into qualification for the Private Client Mortgage Rate Program and can not be considered for overall mortgage qualification.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday accepted and consolidated three cases that consider whether pension plans operated by church - affiliated groups are subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.