Private client wealth planning goals, endowment and foundation spending rates, and
pension return on plan asset assumptions, all rely on sound capital market return assumptions.
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses
on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect
on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions
on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact
on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact
on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16)
returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes
on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco
on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted
on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence
on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments
on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest
on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
significant changes in discount rates, rates of
return on pension assets, mortality tables and other factors could adversely affect our earnings and equity and increase our
pension funding requirements;
He expects the long - term stock market
return to be 3 % — not the historical norm of 7 % that
pension plans continue to lean
on.
Lost jobs; a leaky classroom ceiling that required 21 buckets; and stapled textbooks rather than the usual hardcover — it's not just future retirees that will suffer if investment
returns from state - sponsored
pension plans continue
on their downward trajectory.
Since CPP is not eligible for retroactive
pension income splitting
on your tax
return like other forms of eligible
pension income,
pension sharing is something to consider proactively when applying for your
pension.
It may not be an issue depending
on your expected income in retirement, Peter, but OAS clawback reduces your OAS
pension by 15 % of every dollar your net income
on line 236 of your tax
return exceeds $ 74,789 in 2017.
He said that makes it difficult to find new investments at a price that provide the
returns that are required so the Canada
Pension Plan can deliver
on its commitments.
TORONTO — The 2013 - 14 financial year was an unusually strong one for the Canada
Pension Plan Investment Board, which earned a 16.5 per cent annual
return on the billions of dollars in assets it manages for the national retirement system, but its CEO cautions that level of growth likely won't soon be repeated.
The target cuts, in turn, can lead to increased contributions from employees and their employers to fund the
pension systems as their reliance
on investment
returns decreases.
As a result,
pension funds have had to go out
on the risk curve, taking more risk to glean more
return by investing, in part, in assets that are not as liquid as stocks or bonds.
If parliament gives its nod, Greek voters will be asked to rule
on two complex draft documents that detail a proposal by the country's creditors to unlock aid of as much as 15.5 billion euros for Greece in
return for sales - tax increases and
pension reforms.
States, through their employee
pension plans, sponsor excellent financial institutions that,
on a not - for - profit basis, get the highest
returns for the least cost.
Other Post-Retirement, Net represents the other components of net periodic
pension costs not classified as Service Costs, Interest Costs, Expected
Return on Plan Assets, Actuarial Gains \ Losses, Amortization of Unrecognized Prior Service Costs, Settlements, Curtailments, or Transition Costs.
Calling the 6.6 % real
return a «chain letter» and a «Ponzi scheme,» he went
on to note, «The legitimate question that market analysts, government forecasters and
pension consultants should answer is how that 6.6 % real
return can possibly be duplicated in the future given today's initial conditions which historically have never been more favorable for corporate profits.
When I said that the cult of equity was dying, what I meant was that those investors and those liabilities structures such as
pension funds and insurance companies that have depended
on a 6.5 % constant real
return from stocks such as we've have had over the past century are bound to be disappointed.
Every
pension fund he studied is a monthly net seller of assets in order to fund beneficiary payouts — i.e. the cash contributions from current payees into the fund plus investment
returns on capital is not enough to fund current beneficiary payouts.
TORONTO, May 15, 2017 - Building
on a strong 2016 annual
return of 6.8 per cent, Canadian defined benefit
pension plans upheld the positive growth trend with Q1 2017
returns of 2.9 per cent, according to the $ 650 billion RBC Investor & Treasury Services All Plan Universe, the industry's most comprehensive universe of Canadian
pension plans.
It shows someone who retired in the mid-1990s could expect to receive a 10 percent rate of
return on their Canada
Pension Plan contributions, but late boomers, Gen - Xers and subsequent generations can expect a rate of
return closer to 2 percent.
2017.05.15 Canadian
pension returns post four consecutive quarters of gains: RBC Investor & Treasury Services Building
on a strong 2016 annual
return of 6.8 per cent, Canadian defined benefit
pension plans upheld the positive growth trend with Q1 2017
returns of 2.9 per cent...
Building
on a strong 2016 annual
return of 6.8 per cent, Canadian defined benefit
pension plans upheld the positive growth trend with Q1 2017
returns of 2.9 per cent...
Although
pension funds or bank deposits, as less risky investments, would have been better options to equities, they yield lower
returns on investment.
Borrowing rates will rise for governments, home buyers and other long - term borrowers, while savers will see more
returns on conservative holdings such as savings accounts and it should become easier to fund
pension savings.
And EK is already stretching the limits
on how it values its
pension assets by assuming the long - term
return on plan assets will be 8.73 % for the life of the plan.
In fact, the company's assumed
return on plan assets is so high that it allowed EK to book income from its
pension plan equal to 2.2 % of its revenue last year.
Public
pensions are allowed to fund
on the basis that their assets magically
return their expected assumption.
Recent measures such as changes to the Canada
Pension Plan, the rollback of planned cuts to Employment Insurance premiums, the introduction of carbon levies and cap - and - trade programs, and significant minimum wage hikes in Ontario and Alberta have a cumulative impact
on investment
returns and business competitiveness.
A big drop in
returns would be particularly vexing for
pension funds, which are counting
on private equity, hedge funds and other so - called alternative investments to help them meet their mounting liabilities.
Changes in actuarial assumptions (i.e. the discount rate and expected
return on plan assets) can cause big swings in total reported net
pension liabilities.
Members are required to contribute 0.75 percent more of their salary in years when the actual investment
returns on the
pension plan are 1 percent or more below the assumed rate of
return.
Among them are the rights to: bullet joint parenting; bullet joint adoption; bullet joint foster care, custody, and visitation (including non-biological parents); bullet status as next - of - kin for hospital visits and medical decisions where one partner is too ill to be competent; bullet joint insurance policies for home, auto and health; bullet dissolution and divorce protections such as community property and child support; bullet immigration and residency for partners from other countries; bullet inheritance automatically in the absence of a will; bullet joint leases with automatic renewal rights in the event one partner dies or leaves the house or apartment; bullet inheritance of jointly - owned real and personal property through the right of survivorship (which avoids the time and expense and taxes in probate); bullet benefits such as annuities,
pension plans, Social Security, and Medicare; bullet spousal exemptions to property tax increases upon the death of one partner who is a co-owner of the home; bullet veterans» discounts
on medical care, education, and home loans; joint filing of tax
returns; bullet joint filing of customs claims when traveling; bullet wrongful death benefits for a surviving partner and children; bullet bereavement or sick leave to care for a partner or child; bullet decision - making power with respect to whether a deceased partner will be cremated or not and where to bury him or her; bullet crime victims» recovery benefits; bullet loss of consortium tort benefits; bullet domestic violence protection orders; bullet judicial protections and evidentiary immunity; bullet and more...
In a blog post for the think - tank's website, McMahon takes issue with AFL / CIO President Denis Hughes» statement that with the high rate of
return on the state employee
pension fund during the last fiscal year, the need for an overhaul of the system (i.e. less generous benefits, is unnecessary).
Miliband said that after taking
on the media and banking sectors he was turning his attention to
pensions, with a focus
on high charges and poor
returns.
Case in point: New York state, where Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli announced last week that the $ 178 billion state and local
pension fund ended its fiscal year March 31 with a minuscule
return on assets of 0.19 percent, well short of its 7 percent long - term target.
Seabrook and hedge fund founder Murray Huberfeld were indicted
on conspiracy and honest services wire fraud for a scheme in which Seabrook allegedly took a $ 60,000 payoff in
return for steering $ 20 million in union
pension money to Huberfeld's fund.
Similar results can be expected from New York City's five municipal - worker
pension funds, which also bank
on 7 percent
returns.
Union
pension investments expect a 10 % to 12 %
return vs 5 % interest
on municipal bonds.
Among those myths is the notion — oft - repeated by DiNapoli — that public -
pension funds are «long - term investors» that can stick with their assumptions through thick and thin, riding out the kind of market volatility that saw the state funds»
return on assets veer from a 26 percent loss in 2009 to a 26 percent gain in 2010.
He says the nation's third - largest public
pension fund earned an estimated 11.3 percent
return on investments.
* Concerning the city
pension funds» adoption in 2012 of a 7 percent assumed rate of
return, Bloomberg added: «If I can give you one piece of financial advice: If somebody offers you a guaranteed 7 percent
on your money for the rest of your life, you take it and just make sure the guy's name is not Madoff.»
Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi has reportedly agreed to step down next year and bring forward elections in
return for a deal
on pensions, according to a report by La Repubblica newspaper.
He was a member of the Treasury Select Committee from 2004 until he was briefly, in 2005, a spokesman
on work and
pensions under the leadership of Michael Howard, but
returned to the backbenches later in the year when David Cameron became Conservative leader.
Tax
returns for state Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli show the sole trustee for the $ 152 billion
pension fund received almost $ 9,000 from investments and interest
on top of his $ 146,838 public salary in 2012.
I'd like to think this was partly because of the Tory campaign against him
on helping ruin the
pension funds (I say helped, not all his fault because poor stock
returns and longer life expectancy has reduced the payouts aswell).
Comptroller officials said the salary bumps were based solely
on the median pay for similarly sized public
pension boards and that the raises would be paid out of
pension - board investment
returns.
Liu touts a combined 12.1 percent
return on investments in fiscal year 2013, when the city's five
pension funds grew from $ 111.3 billion to $ 124.8 billion.
Carl Paladino, the 2010 GOP standard bearer and a reflection of the conservative base, called Gibson «an extraordinary guy» who he admired for keeping his word
on term limits and
returning his Army
pension.
He said he'd «likely» recommend a reduction in the assumed rate of
return on pension - fund investments below the current 8 percent a year.
Toback has been running against Albany to some degree in his campaign, hitting Weisenberg early
on for «retiring» and then
returning to the public payroll in order to game the
pension system (a not - unusual, though optically problematic pratice).
NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio's preliminary budget sets aside $ 50 million to have taxpayers guarantee an eye - popping 8.25 percent
return on a special
pension fund covering more than 20,000 school principals, supervisors and staffers.