Not exact matches
How many
people on this planet have AIDS because they believed the teachings
about condoms; how many unwanted children have been abused because their parent (s) bought the argument
about the evil of contraception.
That was kind of my point the
people are choosing to ignore church policy
about se - x with multiple partners but its the churches fault they can't choose to use a
condom.
``... very strong politically correct and left - wing revisionist history attitude or tone that's also Anti-American (especially a vague charge against «U.S. foreign policy»), and strong anti-capitalist elements... blasphemy, implied urinating, vomiting, scatological humor, and comments on breast feeding and sexual parts of
people's bodies; light brief violence includes beating on car window and trying to damage car, man comically shoves
people off a stage, man burns books; sexual content includes homosexual references, implied adultery with a pregnancy out of wedlock, talk
about a priest raping boy in the past, a giant
condom balloon placed on church steeple, references to real
condoms, implied fornication; upper male nudity, man wears a dress; alcohol use and drunkenness; smoking and marijuana use depicted, including eating marijuana brownies; and, strong miscellaneous immorality includes lying, stealing, revenge, rebellion, dysfunctional family portrayed, father is a pothead and a drinker and lives in a trailer»
While many
people have expressed reservations
about the direction of the Clinton economic program, the good economic news is that retail
condom sales broke the $ 300 million dollar mark for 1993.
We needed someone who could answer off the cuff the detailed attacks made on Church history and policy: opposition to the use of
condoms to combat AIDS, magisterial teaching
about homosexuality; the Church's historical attitude to slavery, involvement in the crusades, relations with the Jewish
people; someone who could properly confront and contextualise the evil actions of some members of the Church - in Ireland or Rwanda, for example.
The proposed advertisements will provide only educational, medically accurate, factual information
about access to
condoms and pregnancy advisory services, and will not sexualise or mislead young
people.
People are always complaining
about condoms; but
condoms so drastically reduce the risk of becoming infected with a sexually transmitted disease (STD) and avoiding pregnancy, however, that it's worth finding a way to change your partner's mind.
From birth control [the pill, NFP, TCOYF, abstinence,
condoms, nothing at all], to home birth versus hospital birth, immunizations, the list goes on and on - the main thing I want to convey to ALL
people is to PRAY
about your decision, FERVENTLY!
Some researchers and health - care providers have expressed concern that the sense of security offered by the drug could lead
people at high risk of HIV infection to grow complacent
about condom use, routine HIV testing, and other precautions.
Middle aged and older
people can be even less likely to use
condoms, as the women are often beyond worrying
about pregnancy, and the men are more prone to impotence and fear hampering their performance.
In fact, it's a tough sell to any single group because a majority of the
people that see this will either be too young to learn anything from the message or mature enough to know that using a
condom prevents you from having to worry
about any unexpected «surprises.»
This past summer, Twitter banned ads by Lucky Bloke, a
condom retailer with a mission to educate
people about how proper
condom fit leads to greater pleasure and more consistent use.
Condoms are one of the best ways for sexually active
people to avoid sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), but many worry that
people are becoming more lax
about protecting themselves.
A recent study found that
people who cheat were significantly less likely to use
condoms with partners outside of their primary relationship than
people who practice NN (the percentage using
condoms was 48 % vs. 66 % for vaginal intercourse and 32 % vs. 49 % for anal intercourse, respectively).2 Not only that, but cheaters were less likely to discuss their sexual history and disease status, were more likely to have sex under the influence of drugs and alcohol, and were less inclined to tell their primary partners
about those sexual encounters.
If you've had sex with another
person and did not use a
condom, female
condom, dental dam, or other barrier, it's a good idea to talk to your health care provider
about STD testing.
Rates of infidelity in «monogamous» relationships are also alarmingly high, hovering between 20 - 55 %, depending on what time frame you ask
people about (e.g., having ever cheated versus cheated in the last 5 years).3 Sadly, when cheaters cheat, they typically do not take protective measures to reduce sexually transmitted infections 100 % of the time.1 Then, when they have sex with their primary partner, they rarely use barrier protection (e.g.,
condoms); this puts all partners at risk for diseases such as syphilis and HIV.
But
people aren't perfect, so in real life they're
about 79 % effective — that means
about 21 out of 100
people who use female
condoms as their main method of birth control will get pregnant each year.
If you've had sex with another
person and did not use a
condom, female
condom, dental dam, or other barrier, it's a good idea to talk to your healthcare provider
about sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing.
But
people aren't perfect, so in real life
condoms are
about 85 % effective — that means
about 15 out of 100
people who use
condoms as their only birth control method will get pregnant each year.
For example,
people who communicate
about their sexual likes and dislikes with their romantic partners report higher levels of sexual satisfaction.1, 2 Young
people who receive comprehensive sex education are more likely to use
condoms and take precautions against unwanted pregnancies compared to those who receive abstinence - only sex education.3 And exposure to
people with diverse sexual identities contributes to reductions in stigma and prejudice.4, 5