Sentences with phrase «people adhering to»

Hopefully you can now see why you can find so many examples of people adhering to low calorie diets and lots of exercise yet not able to lose a pound.

People adhering to a Mediterranean diet consume up to 50 milliliters (around one fifth of a cup) of the fragrant green liquid a day.

the body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices....

Our country is not «amoral» because of the lack of «religious» beliefs but because neither our government nor our people adhere to the Word of God any longer.

The conflict happens where there is data and people adhere to intuition.

People adhere to organized religions out of fear - fear of being outcast and fear of being unsure.

Along that same vein, most meatball recipes call for breadcrumbs, which is why, as a person adhering to a gluten - free diet, you can't just eat the meatballs served at your church potluck.

Image courtesy of iStockphoto / BakiBG SAN ANTONIO, Texas — So much of our information from — and interaction with — the world is now mediated by computers, cell phones and tablets that health experts have been practically running themselves ragged trying to find ways to use these conduits to help people make healthier choices.Great success stories have come out of parts of the developing world, where cell phones have been used to improve maternal and infant care and help people adhere to medication guidelines.

She says this suggests that people adhere to treatment more than previously thought.

Zoning out mentally during exercise didn't have a negative effect, but it didn't help a person adhere to a regimen, either.

These aspects of a book press release that I'll list here may go against the grain or «rules» which some marketing people adhere to, but this has worked for me time and time again garnering significant media coverage contributing to some sell out events for fiction authors.

Whether any particular person adheres to that philosophy or not is their own choice to make.

Under your plan the AGW meme goes on forever in part because knowledgeable people adhered to political correctness, their own predisposition (academic left) which includes policy authority translating into political practice.

Demanding that people adhere to your jargon is unfriendly.

We have tools to make sure that people adhere to the rules of the tribunal, and treat each other respectfully.

Urging, recommending, or suggesting that any person adhere to any schedule or other recommendation concerning the rate or amount of commissions or fees;

Not exact matches

Create some guidelines, and hire people who will adhere to them.

Says Lyon: «I'd much rather they get the right person, who's going to be there for 10 years, than adhere to an arbitrary Wall Street timeline.»

O.C. Tanner's research found that the people who created the most value in their organizations were those whose work required them to adhere to rules, policies and procedures, not those who were given carte blanche.

And a representative democracy does not need to adhere to every wish of the people.

The People's Bank of China (PBOC) is similarly drafting new guidelines that, if enacted, would require cryptocurrency exchanges to adhere to banking regulations and verify client identities.

Adhering to the mission, «Technology Improves Health,» Edward Group is committed to applying modern high technology to increase the overall health standard of people.

In fact, the Tanach is very clear to the Jews that the only covenant they have (and will ever have) is the one pounded out between G - d and the Jews on Mt. Sinai (which, if you read the fine print AND the NT is allowed to be understood / interpreted by designated leaders in the Jewish society; Jesus believed those people to be the Pharisees and told his JEWISH followers to adhere to Pharisee teachings... the Pharisees were the honorable, compassionate end of the theology spectrum in the first century instead of the bad rap they get from a mis - reading of the NT (done generally with no comprehension of Jewish culture or history).

I find it interesting that people who adhere to orthodox / fundamentalist streams of Christianity feel the need to make everyone live as they do (regardless of their beliefs)-- it's as though the only way these people can come close to living in accordance with their views is to make sure everyone else pretends to be like them in order to remove the temptation for them.

But, we also criticize people who adhere to the dogma — of Christianity, of Islam, of Hindu tradition — when the actions are far removed from what the «policies» of the respective texts dictate (e.g. love thy neighbor, but act badly to others, specifically non-Christians *), or when the «policies» are adhered to VERY closely and make no sense in today's day and age (e.g. homosexuality is a sin).

I am glad that there was a well - thought out debate between two very intelligent people who happen to adhere to different viewpoints.

Just don't expect (and pass laws) other people to adhere to your lifestyle.

you believe in a narrow view of a god based on ancient fairy tales and that if you adhere to the teachings of a supposed son of god you will go to disneyland in the sky forever... which is damm ridiculous... I consider myself an atheist but I am aware of the possibility of a creative force which created the universe... but that god chatted with people 2000 years ago and brought out a book is childish and stoopid!

Most I know are humanists; people who care about the rest of humanity regardless of their faith and who adhere to a moral code just as noble as anyone, just without a deity as the center of their life.

You fail to understand that there are a lot of people who are Christian but do not adhere to many of the popular «pagan» rituals and beliefs you speak of.

History shows the Catholic Church being a lawless body that has been allowed to inflict their beliefs and twisted ways on people in the name of «religion» and force weaker minds into adhering to their closed minded belief system.

Let us remember that and be more respectful — let us reach out to each other with AT THE LEAST tolerance that each person will have different views and INSTEAD of trying to degrade someone just because they refuse to adhere to your beliefs — LISTEN to them and allow that you may feel differently but they have a RIGHT to believe or not believe as they will.

In the present social and cultural context, where there is a widespread tendency to relativize truth, practising charity in truth helps people to understand that adhering to the values of Christianity is not merely useful but essential for building a good society and for true integral human development.

But I wouldn't expect people here to hold me accountable for anything more than adhering to blog ettiquette.

The United Nations Declaration on Human Rights of 1949 Articles 18 and 19 says that «every person should have the freedom to adhere to and practice the religion he or she chooses, and to change religion without coming under pressure as a result».

People like you are why the federal government needs to set standards that all companies must adhere to.

As for your plea to modernity, there are countless numbers of scientifically minded mordern people who adhere to the Christian faith, but of course you already knew that.

I have never understood why religious people need desperately to make everyone adhere to their own values.

Underscoring this point, they note that religious switchers adhere even more closely to the dominant moral ethos of their new groups than do people raised in those groups.

There are some immature, insecure people who demand that * everyone * adhere to their point of view because they themselves don't, in their heart of hearts, believe that said view holds any water and are seeking confirmation via popularity, because if more people believe it, it MUST be correct.

It long ago became a place for people who wanted to keep the label of «Christian» without adhering to any of the concomitant beliefs that comes with it.

It has often been violated, also in modern times — massively so under Nazism and Communism — but civilized people have adhered to it in principle.

It should be clearly understood that Islam does not set aside a specific person with the right to interpret the Qur» an or the Sunnah, nor does it make it a duty of the people to adhere to any person's individual views on questions which are open to private opinion.

The message of The Kigdom isn't about patting people the back and telling them they're wonderful... it's about telling the truth... and the truth is, is that the church at large is a mess and certainly doesn't adhere to the teachings of Jesus.

Where is CNN's (and the rest of the media in the non-Muslim world's) outrage at the «convert or die» philosopy and conduct of people and governments around the globe which profess and adhere to the tenets of Islam?

But it is certainly not that people are not adhering to patriarchy.

Hence we make now the division between radical Islam and Muslim people who are normal, but the distinction is rather tenuous and thin, as Mohammed did and said some wild things, that they really should adhere to.

My point is that people need a valid argument to suggest everyone else adhere to their law.

When a pastoral vision is strictly adhered to, many people are left behind and gifts and graces sent to the church remain unrecognized.

A vision that everyone must adhere to is holding back ALL the other possibility that might exist in all those poor confined people.