Sentences with phrase «people against whom»

He insisted that we were the rich people against whom Jesus inveighed.

There are many songs written and played by people against whom I have the most fundamental and passionate disagreements in the moral and intellectual realms (which are the most important ones), yet hearing their songs can evoke ecstatic feelings that are very much like feelings of worship and longing for God.

Noun excommunication (plural excommunications) The act of excommunicating or ejecting; especially an ecclesiastical censure whereby the person against whom it is pronounced is, for the time, cast out of the communication of the church; exclusion from fellowship in things spiritual.

They are persons against whom existing laws are enforced capriciously and arbitrarily, persons who are continually threatened with exposure, with loss of job and social standing.

If somebody comes in to a police station and makes an allegation clearly of the most trivial character they nevertheless have to record it, to investigate it, go through a process of dealing with it which may involve going round and confronting the person against whom the trivial allegation has been made.

«If somebody comes in to a police station and makes an allegation clearly of the most trivial character they nevertheless have to record it, to investigate it, go through a process of dealing with it which may involve going round and confronting the person against whom the trivial allegation has been made,» he said.

Florida College System institution police, upon request of the sheriff or local police authority, may serve subpoenas or other legal process and may make arrests of persons against whom arrest warrants have been issued or against whom charges have been made for violations of federal or state laws or county or municipal ordinances.

University police, when requested by the sheriff or local police authority, may serve subpoenas or other legal process and may make arrest of any person against whom a warrant has been issued or any charge has been made of violation of federal or state laws or county or city ordinances.

(6) Provide the respondent (the person against whom an allegation of research misconduct has been made) with a reasonable opportunity (e.g., 30 calendar days) to review and respond to the investigation report.

Respondent is the person against whom an allegation of research misconduct has been made, or the person whose actions are the focus of the inquiry or investigation.

No new license shall be issued upon the filing of a new application by any person against whom any penalty or fee has been imposed unless and until such penalty or fee previously accrued under this Section has been paid.

The Executive Secretary or his designee will contact the person against whom the complaint was made by letter.

The Student Judicial Committee may also consider complaints that are not delineated under Category A or Category B above, provided that the person against whom the complaint is made is notified in writing as to whether the proceeding will follow the rules of Category A or Category B, delineated below.

Sarah your description contributes nothing, other than a generalized person against whom you can rail.

A person who uses defensive force shall be presumed to have reasonably feared imminent death or great bodily harm, or the commission of a felony upon him or another or upon his dwelling, or against a vehicle which he was occupying... if the person against whom the defensive force was used, was in the process of unlawfully and forcibly entering, or had unlawfully and forcibly entered, a dwelling, occupied vehicle... and the person who used defensive force knew or had reason to believe that the forcible entry or unlawful and forcible act was occurring or had occurred.

«This judgment quite literally follows the person against whom it is made for life, surviving bankruptcy, and even extending beyond life to become a debt of the offender's estate,» Grace writes.

The Act provides for protection from double jeopardy: a person against whom an AMP has been imposed can not be prosecuted for the same offence, and a person who has been charged with an offence can not be ordered to pay an AMP.

Similarly, if you can not prove that the person against whom you brought a personal injury lawsuit (the «defendant») was negligent, you will not be awarded money damages by a court.

A defendant (the person against whom a lawsuit is being brought) may be held legally responsible for a personal injury under one of the three following classifications:

(k) any other amounts paid or ordered to be paid by the person against whom the order is made as a refund or as restitution or other compensation in respect of the conduct; and

The person against whom the order is sought can argue that the impact on their privacy and security of the person would be grossly disproportionate to the aim of the order.

(2) If a person makes a claim for statutory accident benefits, the person shall furnish the person against whom the claim is made with full particulars of,

penalizes the defendant for engaging in public participation «plaintiff» means a person who initiates or maintains a proceeding against a defendant; «proceeding» means any action, suit, matter, cause, counterclaim, appeal, or originating application that is brought in the Supreme Court or the Provincial Court, but does not include a prosecution for an offence or a crime; «public interest» means the whole of the subject matter invites public attention, or a matter in which the public has some substantial concern because it affects the welfare of citizens, or one to which considerable public notoriety or controversy has attached; «public participation» means communication or conduct aimed at influencing public opinion, or promoting further lawful action by the public or any government body, in relation to an issue of public interest; «Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP)» means a claim that arises from a form of expression or public participation, by the person against whom the claim is asserted that was made in connection with an official proceeding or about a matter of public interest; Purposes of this Act: 2 The purposes of this Act are to a) Establish a statutory right to public participation for every individual; b) Encourage individuals to express themselves on matters of public interest; c) Promote broad participation in debates on matters of public interest; d) Discourage the use of litigation as a means of unduly limiting expression on matters of public interest; and, e) Preserve the right of access to the courts for all proceedings and claims that are not brought or maintained for an improper purpose.

Order to dismiss (3) On motion by a person against whom a proceeding is brought, a judge shall, subject to subsection (4), dismiss the proceeding against the person if the person satisfies the judge that the proceeding arises from an expression made by the person that relates to a matter of public interest.

5 On motion by the person against whom a proceeding is brought, a judge shall, subject to subsection (6), dismiss the proceeding against the person if the person satisfies the judge that the proceeding arises from an expression made by the person that relates to a matter of public interest.

In the event that the person against whom one or more orders have been issues is noncompliant, enforcement of judgement can become a complex matter on its own, and may again necessitate the assistance of courts and legal professionals.

Under Florida law, a restrictive covenant is not enforceable «unless it is set forth in a writing signed by the person against whom enforcement is...

Judge Moir, they said, had regard to the need «that a usual component of a fair trial was for the person against whom allegations had been made to have the opportunity to put questions to or to cross-examine»; and to deny that was a very serious step.

(2) An action or other proceeding described in subsection (1) may be commenced against the Attorney General by a person who is or was the subject of a prosecution and, for the purpose, the Attorney General stands in the place of the person against whom the action or other proceeding would have been brought but for that subsection, and may be found liable in his or her stead.

This judgment quite literally follows the person against whom it is made for life, surviving bankruptcy, and even extending beyond life to become a debt of the offender's estate.

(3) Where a person against whom an order under subsection (1) has been made seeks leave to institute or continue a proceeding, the person shall do so by way of an application in the Superior Court of Justice.

(3) On motion by a person against whom a proceeding is brought, a judge shall, subject to subsection (4), dismiss the proceeding against the person if the person satisfies the judge that the proceeding arises from an expression made by the person that relates to a matter of public interest.

the person against whom the judgment was given had, before the commencement of the proceedings, agreed, in respect of the subject matter of the proceedings, to submit to the jurisdiction of that court or of the courts of that country.

the person against whom the judgment was given submitted to the jurisdiction of that court by voluntarily appearing in the proceedings (which will not include submitting arguments on the merits where under local law, a challenge to jurisdiction can only be brought in conjunction with such arguments on the merits); or

the person against whom the judgment was given was claimant, or counterclaimed, in the proceedings in the foreign court;

(20) Please put a cross in the box corresponding to the person against whom the judgment should be enforced.

The duty to give advance notice and an opportunity to be heard to a person against whom a draconian statutory power is to be exercised is one of the oldest principles of what would now be called public law.

Neither the person against whom enforcement is sought, nor the child shall, at this stage of the proceedings, be entitled to make any submissions on the application.

The local jurisdiction shall be determined by reference to the place of habitual residence of the person against whom enforcement is sought or by reference to the habitual residence of any child to whom the application relates.

The defendant is the person against whom the lawsuit is filed.

(11) In the case of a claim for payment of a liquidated sum, part payment of the sum by the person against whom the claim is made or by the person's agent has the same effect as the acknowledgment referred to in subsection (10).

If a person with a claim and a person against whom the claim is made have agreed to have an independent third party resolve the claim or assist them in resolving it, the limitation periods established by sections 4 and 15 do not run from the date the agreement is made until,

(1) A person against whom another person may have a claim may serve a notice of possible claim on the other person.

The Act provides that a person against whom another person may have a claim may serve a notice of possible claim on that other person.

The ultimate limitation period does not run during the incapacity of the person with the claim, during the person's minority or during any time in which the person against whom the claim is made wilfully concealed essential facts or misled the person with the claim.

The court should clearly consider the objections or defences of the person against whom committal proceedings might be brought before deciding to grant permission for the information to be used.

776.032 (1) A person who uses force as permitted in... s. 776.013... is justified in using such force and is immune from criminal prosecution and civil action for the use of such force, unless the person against whom force was used is a law enforcement officer, as defined in s. 943.10 (14), who was acting in the performance of his or her official duties and the officer identified himself or herself in accordance with any applicable law or the person using force knew or reasonably should have known that the person was a law enforcement officer.

Where no cause of action is alleged against the person against whom the freezing order is sought, it is not necessary for the substantive claim against the cause of action defendant (i.e. the debtor) to be asserted in the jurisdiction where the Mareva order is sought against the NCAD;

Delivering judgment, Lord Sumption said the bank received no notice of the listing: «The duty to give advance notice and an opportunity to be heard to a person against whom a draconian statutory power is to be exercised is one of the oldest principles of what would not be called public law.»

Depending upon the specific issues being litigated in your divorce, a protective order may be used against the person against whom it was issued.