Sentences with phrase «people are in for a treat»

So I think that person is in for a treat.

Not exact matches

In the past, when people of color were treated with indignity and disdain for simply existing, most responses from company leaders involved an approach of firing an employee, a feeble apology, and business as usual once the event faded from the headlines.

Maintaining high standards for how people treat each other is a wonderful thing as we live in a world that's rife with animosity and discrimination.

On a typical day, more than a thousand people are treated in ERs across the country for misusing prescription opioids.

As an exec at Shire (shpg), which with $ 6 billion in revenue is one of the smaller Big Pharmas, he spent months persuading leaders and commercial and supply - chain people to launch a clinical trial for the ADHD drug Vyvanse to treat binge eating.

«My words have been grossly mischaracterized and taken out of context... I was discussing the value of treating people for using dangerous and illegal drugs like marijuana, and the context in which treatment is successful.»

She said that 59 injured people are still being treated in hospitals across Manchester, some of them for life - threatening conditions.

«Barack and I were raised with so many of the same values: that you work hard for what you want in life; that your word is your bond and you do what you say you're going to do; that you treat people with dignity and respect, even if you don't know them, and even if you don't agree with them.

«From a young age, my parents impressed on me the values that you work hard for what you want in life, that your word is your bond and you do what you say and keep your promise, that you treat people with respect.

Persons that for U.S. federal income tax purposes are treated as a partner in a partnership holding shares of our Class A common stock should consult their tax advisors.

Corporate personhood is easily ridiculed on late - night television, but as Eric Posner pointed out in Slate, the law often «treats various nonhuman, nonsentient entities as «persons» for certain legal purposes.»

In fact, if recent FB stock predictions are to be believed, than people holding FB stock might be in for a real treaIn fact, if recent FB stock predictions are to be believed, than people holding FB stock might be in for a real treain for a real treat.

Homes are the centre of community, and our homes should be places for people to live in; not treated like commodities to be bought, and sold, and traded exclusively for profit.

«Common values,» I found in my interviews, is a phrase that stands in for one of two things: treating other people with respect or giving back to the community.

Yeah, I know a lot of people who were drowning in their own sp it and blood, that were then delivered a fatal stab wound, left hanging in the hot middle eastern sun for a few more hours, then treated with caustic herbs that are now walking around today...

= > treating races differently CAN be fine / moral for the same reason that while it is immoral to favor a white person over an african american for job selection, it is NOT immoral to favor an african american over a white in job selection (within certain industries and to achieve specific goals).

It is also true that later people used (and still use) his teachings to oppress others, but many (perhaps most) Christians today look to the example of Jesus for guidance in how to treat others, not to the Old Testament.

Up until recently, people were expected to treat visitors very well, for the world in which they traveled was so very harsh.

«keeping people off the street»: well, that's pretty obvious, the only problem with that is (in the determinist view), you are treating the culprit in an immoral way, punishing them for an action they had no option but to commit.

As an atheist who believes in «Choice» (I dislike the idea of abortion but see the need for people to be able to opt for it) and polygamy (marriage should be for any number of consenting adults regardless of gender) and believes that the idea of draconian anti-gun measures is anathema as it takes away an individual's right to live the way he wants to live, I think that if believing in a deity makes a person treat other people nicer then we should leave that person and his beliefs alone.

Dear friendly peoples of world, hope the all mankind could kindly arise with joint effort to save this peace loving people from the wicked and severe tortures and baseless accusations.How mankind in this century of light can treat another human being simply heap false accusations and put in prison for so many years when they have done no wrongs.l.

This always seems a convenient little story for the theist, because otherwise you have to accept that a person could feel a god's presence and then become aware that it was all a delusion, much like the awareness that many feel about the voices in their heads when treated with antipsychotics.

However, I was on primarily a theological journey, and ultimately, even though the people treated me well in those venues, Emergent (and for me all of Western) theology just developed a lot of holes.

We are all «sinners», in that we all fall short of aspirations we have for how we treat people.

Pearson said: «We're totally motivated by what we believe in, in terms of justice, loving one another, and how we should treat one another right and fairly and how you should reward people a fair wage for a fair day's work.

This is very difficult for many people to comprehend, for I recall vividly how this biblical episode was treated in Cecil B. De Mille's The Ten Commandments.

You say you always treat people like you like to be I guess you love being hated for your sexuality You love when people put words in your mouth «Bout what you believe, make you sound like a freak «Cause if you really believe what you say you believe You wouldn't be so damn reckless with the words you speak Wouldn't silently conceal when the liars speak Denyin» all the dyin» of the remedy Tell me, brother, what matters more to you?

Bobby: When for - profit corporations in this country are fighting in court to be treated like people, I think the comparison is valid.

The categorical imperative to «treat humanity, whether in thine own person or in that of any other, in every case as an end withal, never as means only» (46) was, for Kant, the «universal law of nature» (38) and his understanding of it is the most radical conception of natural law in its modern sense.

But maybe that set apartness is supposed to be more in the way we show grace for people we dislike, or the way we treat others, not in what aspects of modern culture we eschew.

I saw things in Racine years ago that continue to haunt me, for they were outrageous, and showed that many people in our democracy are viewed and treated as less than human.

To front - load the story by saying people were being treated in animal stalls, and only later point out it was a free clinic held in a county fairground (rural area, large crowd... likely the only suitable place that passed health and safety requirements for such an event), and to not mention that many if not most of those taking advantage of the free medical care were likely farm workers and not here legally... is beyond poor reporting.

@PUZZLED — well see my issus lies with the fact of how women were treated in ancient times — they were property and so allowing them to go thru all the emotionals and physicals of carrying and then giving birth only to toss it off a cliff isn't what i'd call good parenting — having an abortion for many people who should NEVER have kids is (in my opinion) good parenting!

You and your God and all that believe like you can have full reign for all eternity in your particular conceptualization of your afterlife but here on Earth we like people to be treated equal before human law.

Up to a certain point, this applies even in a relationship in which the other person treats one strictly as It, for the other must be a Thou for us unconditionally and not dependent on how he treats us.

What you share about gay people suffering terribly for coming out is consistent with what I have said in that of course some will be treated horribly for it still.

Among the rough and ready tests of character, this seems a very good one, not infallible but close to it, accounting for the occasional hard day, bad headache, annoying companions: «The way people treat restaurant staff is, I think, a kind of poker tell, revealing a person's character in as long as it takes to say: «I'll have the sea bass».»

The idea that non believers have nothing to care about, nothing to live for and no reason to treat their fellow humans decently is a lie perpetrated by those who wish to keep people in bondage to the myth of a loving, yet just deity.

Mod is an action by a person in an environment, depending on legality or hinduism, illegality by hindu atheism, criminal self center ism, it has nothing to do with environment at large, as it is used today to define matters, because actions of a person are subject to scrutiny individually, not collectively, bases for call to treat individual acts as individually not collectively.

At best, religions can be doorways to undertake such a journey, but too often people treat religions as rooms that they must live in for their lives!

That means abandoning one - size - fits - all attempts to address poverty and looking to the states, where a lot of the creativity in American government resides these days, for approaches that actually empower the poor, because they treat poor people as men and women with potential to be unleashed, not simply as clients to be maintained.

I've spoken at several events for Christian teens in my travels, and let me tell you, to a person, they find anti-gay bullying abhorrent and are very concerned with how the Church has treated their gay friends.

Yet we in the West should strive for humane borders in which travelers and immigrants of all backgrounds are treated with respect by state authorities, and valued as human beings with great potential, rather than dismissed as faceless hordes — or, in Hitchens's words, «countless persons from who - knows - where.»

You'd think the church would be afloat with ethics for how those in power should treat people and what they should do if they violate those ethics.

The concept of welcoming, acceptance, being heard, being treated equally, and being in a forever family are strong attractants for many people.

Due to the fact of the indwelling Holy Spirit and that God is everywhere all the time, God is able to treat each of us as if we were the only person in the world, the only one He needs to listen to, the only one He needs to care for.

For example, in The Christian Doctrine of Creation and Redemption, volume two of his Dogmatics, he treats the work of Christ before the person of Christ, thereby following through on the famous dictum of Melanchthon: hoc est Christum cognoscere, beneficia eius cognoscere (to know Christ is to know his benefits).

And yet, as in Christian belief, there is a possibility for metanoia and forgiveness, and a person who has genuinely repented for his past need not be permanently treated as a transgressor, because in one sense he is different from the person he was formerly.

There must be something about sitting in a Church on Sunday mornings that allows you to justify treating the people who do the work for your business like dog crap.

What I do pay attention to is that the people who work at In - and - Out are actually treated pretty swell for a fast food job, and that makes me really happy.