Sentences with phrase «people argue over»

There's been almost no discussion, at least in places where I look, about Titles II through X of the 2002 (NCLB) version, and most of Title I's myriad provisions seem also to have been set aside while people argue over the future of annual testing.

Mostly laid back, but watching people argue over differences in religion or political ideology really gets my gizzard!

But, I show you all this to elucidate the point that despite all the semantics and nuances people argue over: calories apply to the human body and before you worry about anything else, you need to sort out your energy balance because regardless of how «healthy», organic, or gluten - free, a food is — if you eat more than your body needs, you're going to gain weight.

But, I show you all this to elucidate the point that despite all the semantics and nuances people argue over: calories apply to the human body and before you worry about anything else, you need to sort out your energy balance because

LOLOL... I love the way you people argue over this fictional crap as it it were a real reality... like arguing over the color of Santa's suit and how many reindeer he had and oh yeah... how did they fly... with tiny tiny wings that were invisible?

Well, people argue over it, but wherever «Easter» (the name) really came from, there definitely seems to be numerous connections between the spring equinox, sunrise, new life, spring, bunnies, eggs, fertility rites, and a sex goddess.

This is like watching two people argue over whether Santa Claus is more powerful than the ToothFairy

Aah, another comment page of people arguing over what a fantasy person said... LOVE IT, THANKS!

On a side note, it's odd to see people arguing over religion considering all of the other problems in America.

Point number six, of course, is stated in about a dozen different ways, with people arguing over what the actual requirement should be (repent and be baptized, confess your sins, say this prayer, etc, etc), but for the sake of this blog post, I don't really care about that.

It is sad that I have to say this but, just so you know, I have no issue with people who switch to formula or don't even breastfeed at all — I am fed up of people arguing over how we feed our babiesand although I'm pro breastfeeding that does not make me anti bottle feeding.

It truly wasn't something that people argued over endlessly or were smug about because a mom «could» or «couldn't» breastfeed.»

Each new snippet of video shown during Injustice 2's relentless media barrage leading up to today's launch was accompanied by people arguing over the character's faces.

It's like a very liberal and pretty liberal person arguing over whether Dick Cheney ran the WH or Bush did.

Not exact matches

People loved the ads: retired jocks like Bubba Smith and Dick Butkus «arguing» in bars over whether the brew's chief appeal was that it «tastes great» or is «less filling.»

Sir John A. Macdonald, who would have turned 200 this year, advocated a single central government for Canada, without the bother of provincial legislatures: «one government and one parliament... for the whole of these peoples,» he argued during debates over Confederation.

He'll argue that insufficient funding for the NHS over recent years was one of the reasons 52 % of British people voted for Brexit last year.

In the post, he argues that there is «a subtle advantage that people who've worked at transformative tech companies have over people who haven't.

«We need to invest every defense dollar to meet the threat that we're facing right now as a nation,» she told CNN's Wolf Blitzer later on Wednesday, arguing that the Obama administration's decision to allow transgender people to serve would cost $ 1.35 billion over a decade just for sex - reassignment surgeries.

In it, the Harvard psychology professors argues that people have become more humane over time.

Reasonable people can argue about VMware's future in cloud - oriented data centers, but every company with any sort of public cloud strategy wants to win over existing VMware vSphere customers.

Nobody would argue that employees should be sad and downtrodden, yet it seems as though some businesses and their managers set out with the intention of presiding over a group of miserable people, and then succeed in doing just that.

While Mathew Ingram over at GigaOm has argued that people have always found ways to distract themselves and waste time, perhaps by watching television, the reality is they've never had this sort of fire hose effect before.

Obviously not all Ayurvedic products are dangerous, and people all over the world have used them without issues, as proponents argue.

Now, they are arguing over details like who has the most banks and what percentage of people are using it.

All over America, officials argued that there's very little that can be done to prevent mass violence like the attack that killed at least 58 people in Las Vegas.

I mean, people have often argued that small - cap stocks do better over long periods of time just because they're small.

I've been in meetings where people from the same online marketing staffs argue over everything from what to name their links pages to whether or not to kill them off completely.

Harvard biologist Edward O. Wilson, for example, argues that evolutionary forces imply the triumph of selfish people over altruists within groups, but that groups of altruists beat groups of egoists.

«When you have ideas being brought together and people debating them and arguing over them, bad ideas tend to get filtered out.»

In a debate that lasted more than eight hours, Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras argued that the commission is a requirement from the people who expect answers, and a way to eliminate any «revanchist» intentions for the «many question marks» that have arisen over the last five years.

Why don't we stop arguing about how stupid one religion is over the other and just let people live their lives.

Don't misunderstand me; some evolutionists (particularly some of the neo-atheists like Richard Dawkins, who argues in his new book people who don't believe in evolution are on the same level as Holocaust deniers) have gone ape over their theory (forgive the pun) to the point that they seem to forget it is a theory, and refer to it as if it is an undeniable scientific fact.

So we argue and condemn people over the issue of infant baptism vs. adult baptism, baptism by sprinkling vs. baptism by immersion, and whether a person should be baptized in the name of Jesus vs. in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.

(So why do people love to argue over this kind of stuff?)

Arguing about why shit happens only diverts time and energy away from the thing all people of good will, regardless of their faith or nonfaith, should be concerned with, the thing all of us have some control over: what happens after shit happens.

The characters involved in this affair (Keegan - Michael Key and Annie Parisse) often argue with each other over whether or not they're definitely «bad people,» and the show wants viewers to engage in this debate as well.

And while the little people are busy arguing about the color of someone's skin the big people are taking over.

More than 100 black Secret Service agents argued that the security agency discriminated against black people by promoting less - qualified candidates over them from 1995 to 2005.

Reading over this thread, with people so intense on arguing their position, I can't help but wonder whether a person without God would be attracted to our Lord after reading it?

Lots of people will argue that it will be impossible to judge performance over time — and it may take a while before the markets will adjust to a new, more rational management approach — but we must take the risk and move in that direction.

What must God think of people who argue theology over the tortured body of one of God's creatures?

The Editor in the Preface says that the Tract «polemises against a form of narrow sectarian Secularism which refuses to be sensitive to tradition and faith» and argues that Secularism needs to be rethought taking religious faith seriously, that «only then can Secularism reclaim the ideological space which Fundamentalists are threatening to take over, only then can Secularists capture the minds of the people» (p.vi).

I've seen people fight and argue over which team is «better».

It is not my purpose to argue for the correctness of one or the other view of education, only to note that these are issues over which reasonable people may differ, and to question whether the State has a right to impose the first approach in the face of opposition from parents.

Today researchers Biblical scholars, theologians and lay people are arguing over who Jesus was and what his agenda was.

From its initial announcement, the Peters Projection has been surrounded by controversy: in over 40 articles on the subject, cartographers have vigorously denounced a number of Peters's claims for the map, while he and his supporters have argued that his is the only world map that meets the concerns of people interested in social issues.

I can't believe (well I guess I just don't want to) people still argue over religion.

And over the centuries, many persons have argued that this is an extremely difficult command.»

Let's argue over the race of pretend people more.