Our true wealth is in
the people at every level of society.
Not exact matches
And I think the subject that I would talk about mostly is a
level of compassion and empathy that we need to try to recognize that the only way our
society and the promise
of America and the American dream can continue to exist is to ensure the fact that those
people who were
at the lower end have the same opportunity that
people have with the right ZIP code in America.
It is unliveable
at the
level of society: hence, in Britain we have a government that lauds the freedom
of the individual (and it should be noted in passing, but noted very well, that our present generation
of politicians rarely talk
of the «human
person» or just
of the «
person», but usually
of the «individual») but which has brought in some
of the most draconian legislation in Europe designed to control what
people say and do on certain issues so that
society can proceed in its life as a unity and not just as a mere collection
of individuals.
The goal was to integrate
people at every
level of the economy and
society, giving average workers the means to participate in economic decisions that directly affected their lives.
In aiming our mission
at the upper
levels of society, to the neglect
of the common
people, we have become an elitist church.
Never before had the forgotten
people of our
society — the mentally ill — had a champion
at this
level.
(Obvously the world has progress for the good also I not slamming the progress in health care & with immunisations etc with knowledge but with knowledge becomes power and
at what
level do the
people with power rule how we grow as a
society, I know it's not all cloak and daggers, not conspiracy theory's but taking control
of what we spend our money on in the market and take away to demand to buy chemicals) buy In the past 50 years us humans have introduced over 75,000 chemicals into our world!
At the most basic
level, for a
society that is larger than the number
of people that one can verify as trustworthy (e.g. everything larger than a familiy structure), it is required that
people show a basic amount
of trust towards strangers.
«I don't believe that we've reached the
level of scarcity in our food supply,
at least in Western
societies, where
people would be willing to incorporate insects
at any
level in their diet,» White says.
«Where a child grows up in impoverished conditions... with limited cognitive stimulation, high
levels of stress, and so forth, that
person is more likely to grow up with compromised physical and mental health and lowered academic achievement,» said Martha Farah, director
of the Center for Neuroscience and
Society at the University
of Pennsylvania.
Bacteria are present
at low
levels in the urine
of healthy
people not suffering from a urinary tract infection, Evann Hilt
of Loyola University
of Chicago reported May 18
at a conference
of the American
Society for Microbiology.
In setting up the rudiments
of this situation, the film can't be faulted,
at least on the
level of its script (Rafael Yglesias adapting his own novel), direction (Peter Weir returning to a relatively serious mode after the claptrap
of Dead Poets
Society and Green Card), and performances (Bridges and Perez give uncharacteristic, highly arresting portraits
of people in a sustained state
of shock).
to consider should be the following: 1) the achievement
of full employment or reduction in the unemployment rate; 2) increase the income distribution measured by the Gini index; 3) reduction
of the
levels of crime in
society; 4) increase in service
levels of education, health, housing and transport to the population; 5) increase
of the investment in infrastructure, education, health, housing and sanitation; 6) increase in the HDI - Human Development Index, used by the United Nations, which takes into account GDP per capita, the longevity
of people and their education (measured by illiteracy rate and the enrollment rates
at various
levels of education); and 7) increase
of GNH (Gross National Happiness) indicator, which analyzes 73 variables that contribute most to the goal
of achieving the well - being and satisfaction with life (See GNH posted in website
After all, most
of the public intellectuals among movement conservatives are focused more on the expansive role
of the federal government in civil
society and the marketplace, while more populist conservative types are concerned about preserving what they consider to be traditional values such as the idea that the government that is best is the one
at the local
level that is, in theory, closes to the
people (even if the virtual and real bankruptcies
of cities such as Detroit and Vallejo, Calif., call that thinking into question).
The Tipping Point Foundation investment will help Greenhill Humane
Society provide a higher
level of care for the animals while
at the same time improving access to Greenhill's programs and services for
people in the community.
Groups such as PETA (
People for the Ethical Treatment
of Animals) and HSUS (Humane
Society of the United States, no direct affiliation with local humane
societies) conduct major political lobbying
at the state and federal
levels and spend millions
of dollars annually to promote their agenda and to elect candidates that favor their agenda.
And when you make friends
at any
level, be it
at work, in politics, religion, or any aspect
of society that involves
people supporting each other, while not being
at direct odds, there is always the risk
of someone wanting to turn a blind eye to the obvious.
There is a coming «dark ages»
of information excess accompanied by a «new stupidity,» that most
people still have a hard time fathoming, but I swear I'm seeing it
at every
level of our
society.
At any given
level of technology, there is a trade - off between how many
people can be born into a
society and the
level of per capita physical affluence that can be sustainably supported.
At the global
level, the UN-REDD Programme made a number
of significant contributions in the area
of MRV, engagement
of indigenous
peoples and civil
society in REDD + activities, promotion
of the multiple benefits
of forests, and strengthening interagency collaboration.
But again and again I just see the same shit come out
of you
people «air temps, air temps, air temps» is all you know how to fucking look
at, and the actually CO2 and methane
levels, you don't have a clue how much
society produces compared to natural causes, right now
people make about 50x as much as nature puts out.
But today I prefer to focus on what we have to do to see that this process benefits
people in all countries, and
at all
levels of society.
While it's important not to overstate the case — again, improved health care can be a double - edged sword, if
people are able to live longer because
of it but
at greater financial cost — one way to interpret this study is that if more
people are not economically old, that is they are still contributing to
society on their own and not collecting pension or requiring increased health care, there is less burden on falling population
levels from an otherwise aging population.
All the assistance in the world will be
of no consequence if our governments are not prepared to enter into genuine conversations with our
people at every
level to come to agreement about how Aboriginal
people can take their place in the Australian
society, while still being able to be Aboriginal
people with unique roles and responsibilities in their own land.
• In one version
of our future, Australia is a place in which Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
people and cultures are highly valued and interwoven into a broader, more caring Australian
society at all
levels.
The study found that, in comparison to the
levels of disadvantage experienced, the government funding and programs aimed
at redressing Indigenous disadvantage are clearly not sufficient to raise Indigenous
people to a position
of equality within Australian
society.
This impatience manifests as frustration
at the perceived lack
of achievement, or in the suggestion that Indigenous
people must somehow be
at fault because
of the persistence
of the disadvantage (the lack
of progress being blamed on «waste» and perceived lack
of accountability
of Indigenous organizations), [63] a growing intolerance to commitments being made
at the highest
levels to concrete measures to redress such disadvantage, and in more extreme cases, a return to discredited views which suggest that the only way to improve the situation
of Indigenous
peoples is for them to assimilate into mainstream
society.
the concept
of self - determination
of peoples is one that envisions an ideal path in the way individuals and groups form
societies and their governing institutions... [P] eoples as such, including indigenous
peoples with their own organic social and political fabrics, are to be full and equal participants
at all
levels in the construction and functioning
of the governing institutions under which they live.