This is because it doesn't provide tips, ideas, or principles on how to parent, but instead provides the psychological and theological foundation for why
people behave the way they do, and how we can recognize these foundational truths in our own lives and in our children.
Why do
people behave the way they do?
In their upcoming online EdX course, «Unlocking the Immunity to Change: A New Approach to Personal Improvement,» Kegan and Lahey apply their psychological theory that traditional approaches to making changes can ignore the more complicated underlying reasons
people behave the way they do.»
As another Facing History student wrote: «The more we learn about why and how
people behave the way they do, the more likely we are to become involved and find our own solutions.»
Not exact matches
When the Iowa native is not studying why
people think and
behave the
way they
do, he's feeding chickens, nurturing fruit trees, or splitting wood at his Chicago - area suburban farm.
And while hormones don't directly cause
people to feel or
behave a certain
way, they
do grease the wheels for certain experiences and motivations.
What
do you think about the
way this has
people behaving in unique
ways and on large scales, converging on not just public spaces, but other
people's homes?
Happiness might make
people feel good, but it doesn't always make them
behave in good
ways.
Typically used to explain away someone's poor behavior, like the top salesperson who treats
people badly or the great engineer who is rude during meetings, the loose translation of this statement is, «Even though it's my job as a boss to address this issue, and I wouldn't let anyone else
behave that
way, I don't feel like dealing with it.»
Even though most
people don't
behave this
way anymore, you and your family can be different.
People don't
behave the
way we
do, good or bad, because of ancient scripture or the voice of burning bush in the desert or the face of the messiah on French toast.
Somehow these zealots have convinced themselves if
people behave in
ways they don't like or condone it infringes on their personal freedom.
So while I personally wouldn't categorically state that possession
does or doesn't exist, my experience tells me that
people who
behave in these
ways are more in need of a specially - trained mental health professional than they are in need of a specially - trained priest.
I don't know, but it occurs to me that
people who act up in these
ways might indeed be
behaving above and beyond what our genes have programmed the rest of us to be.
We compel
people to
behave in
ways that they clearly
do not wish to on the basis of aggregated data whose irrelevance would become obvious if we translated them into individually meaningful terms.
In the Old Testament, when God looks like He is
behaving in
ways that
do not match the nature and character of God as revealed in Jesus Christ, this is not because God is being deceptive, but because God is taking the sins of His
people upon Himself just as Jesus
did on the cross.
Yet because God created a world where
people have genuine freedom and can
behave in
ways that are contrary to His will, God can not take away human freedom when they try to use it in
ways that He doesn't like.
When
people try to trick Jesus, as they often
do, He
does not consign them to everlasting slavery, but instead tries to liberate and free them from the fear, the shame, the guilt, and the thinking which causes them to
behave this
way (cf. Matthew 22:23 - 46).
If the
person doesn't
behave that
way, then they must not be the fourth soil, and so must not have eternal life.
I only ask because I sometimes periodically wonder about why
people think the things they
do and
behave the
way they
do but i almost always never
do anything always.
Likewise, when he instructed
people to
behave in certain
ways, he
did not say that you should
do this because it's the right thing to
do.
People who are truly Christian and
behave the
way Christ
did are NOT going to stand up and shout «I'm a Christian and I'm a better one than he is!»
This helps maintain the accuracy of Scripture, in that it accurately reflects the ideas and views of
people who lived at that time, but it enables the reader to understand that because of what we see in Jesus, God
does not
behave the
way people thought He
did.
The problem is that
people who
behave the
way Christ
did — taking care of the less fortunate, living their life as an example of God's love —
do not, by definition, stand up and say «look at me, I'm a Christian — see how superior I am!»
If you don't like it, move to the Middle East where
people are forced to believe and
behave one
way... obviously the
way you
people are.
I don't see christian churches teaching
people to stone anyone anymore, just to legislate against them (stomping on the first ammendment in the process) in hopes that they can ignore the reality of others not agreeing with everything they say, or not
behaving in what they view as the right
way.
What we can
do when we understand institutions, is to better understand why
people sometimes
behave in hurtful
ways when they are otherwise good
people and mean well.
Well, if you have
done something like that, then you've just imposed your idea the
way people should
behave on someone else.
To me, this approach is the touchstone for assessing the difference between fact and fiction in history The core question is:
Does the description of ancient
people's behavior ring true when we compare it to the
way contemporary
people behave in a similar cultural area?
«We set out to be a disruptor, a business that changes the
way people think,
behave and
do business in the health food trade,» he says.
I didn't say that
people are of the opinion that Arsenal will not lose a single game against an inferior side, you would need to be some kind of daft hating simpleton to
behave that
way.
I have often felt judged for «giving in» to my child's tantrums in public, by
people who either don't have kids or don't feel that their emotions are worth respecting (even if they are
behaving in unreasonable
ways).
Many
people who bully others feel entitled to
behave in the
way they
do.
People on IB or ESA are very sick and vulnerable and should not be vilified by Iain Duncan Smith as he did again earlier this week when he suggested that some people in receipt of sickness benefits are behaving in a fraudulen
People on IB or ESA are very sick and vulnerable and should not be vilified by Iain Duncan Smith as he
did again earlier this week when he suggested that some
people in receipt of sickness benefits are behaving in a fraudulen
people in receipt of sickness benefits are
behaving in a fraudulent
way.
I
did not receive any contribution from them, through Mills, through Smith, or directly through the
person who came to see me also and I don't believe that they sent it to Mills and I don't believe that Prof Mills received any money from that place because I think they got fed up with the
way this man was
behaving.»
The Greek
people did not
behave in a manner which is in any
way different to their British counterparts.
The voters believe these
people take jobs that the indigenous working class would be happy to
do (though the evidence for that is scarce), that they make an immediate claim on public services for which they have not made a contribution through their taxes (easier to prove) and that, in some cases, they
behave in a
way the indigenous population finds culturally offensive.
«I
do think there are
people in the party who need to examine their own consciences about the
way they've
behaved and I think they now need to recognise that this is not the
way to treat colleagues and I hope they will reflect on that,» he said.
But I believe in giving
people a second chance, and as the director of communications he
does an excellent job for the Conservative party and
behaves properly and in an upright
way in everything that he
does.»
Sometimes you have to try to give
people frank comments and advice, and in this particular case I
did preface what I was saying by saying if they want to have a conversation about a political matter as well as a personal matter it is confidential, and you
do expect
people to
behave in a trustworthy
way, which these
people from the Daily Telegraph didn't.
For many
people it doesn't fit their sense of the
way women ought to
behave.
People don't
behave the
way economics says they should.
One of the challenges in observational science is sorting out what leads
people to
behave in the
way they
do.»
I don't like the
way people behave like crazed beasts when there is a sale, it's sad really.
Many
people make the mistake of thinking that just because it is online, they can say and
do whatever they want — the most important of all tips for online dating is that if you want to find a real relationship online, you will need to
behave in the same
way you would in the «real» world.
The look of pure horror grows on Beatriz» face, as
does her sense of bewilderment at how
people can
behave this
way.
The first doctor that Sawyer goes to in a panic when she realizes she has to stay doesn't get off the phone right away to talk to her; an attorney that Sawyer's mother calls for help hangs up without waiting for questions or even saying goodbye; and even the new role in which Sawyer may or may not be seeing David is that of a controlling male: someone literally drugging the
people under his care so they'll
behave in the
way they want him to.
Less about actual driving than what drives
people to
behave the
way they
do, to violence, to flee, and to fall in love, the movie reminds us of what can be
done with cinema.
«It's great to see characters
behave and speak the
way people do, in real life.
Their first date
does not go as Alma planned: Reynolds clearly lacks what we'd call «
people skills,» and
behaves in a strange, detached, but intense
way all through the night.