Not exact matches
and if a
person is so offended
by the
question that they refuse to
answer as logically as they did earlier, the interviewer may determine that this
person is too easily shaken for a particular role.
On Twitter my
question was
answered by a bunch of
people almost instantly.
For example, ChaCha provides
answers via text, Aardvark helps
people get
answers by reaching out to their extended social networks, and Hunch helps
people make decisions
by asking them
questions about their personal preferences.
«It's not a bad technique,» Whitaker says, «But a lot of
people can
answer those
questions «of course I would do this and I would be nice to everyone,» and a lot of
people get fooled
by those.»
Actively engaging on Quora
by answering questions within your expertise and commenting on
answers and blog posts is a great way to meet and get to know
people.
He brought up one
question that stood out to him about what the government planned to do next, only to be asked
by more than one
person to
answer it directly, once and for all.
Sen. Kamala Harris (D — CA) opened
by listing all the
questions Zuckerberg avoided
answering throughout the course of the hearing, including
questions about Facebook tracking user activity after a
person logs off, whether Facebook can track users across multiple devices and who is Facebook's biggest competition.
The same goes for «thrive under pressure;» we test that
by acknowledging and at the same time telling
people, «We're going to ask you, in the next ten minutes, to
answer x number of
questions, just to see can you maintain a high - quality bar while getting through this?
These
questions originally appeared on Quora - the knowledge sharing network where compelling
questions are
answered by people with unique insights.
- the knowledge sharing network where compelling
questions are
answered by people with unique insights.
The goal, according to Y Combinator, is to «to
answer a few key
questions: how
people's happiness, well - being and financial health are affected
by basic income, as well as how
people might spend their time.»
originally appeared on Quora - the knowledge sharing network where compelling
questions are
answered by people with unique insights.
This
question originally appeared on Quora - the knowledge sharing network where compelling
questions are
answered by people with unique insights.
There are no shortage of
people who make their livings
by claiming to have
answers to these
questions.
If prospects find
answers to their common
questions via blog posts written
by people at your company, they're much more likely to come into the sales process trusting what you have to say because you've helped them in the past — even before they were interested in purchasing anything from you.
But I can
answer your
question which is «is our political ideology influenced
by other
people in the company» at whatever level?
The tool aims to be «your best source for knowledge» and works
by allowing
people to pose and
answer questions on over 250,000 topics.
Organic reach, as defined
by Facebook is «the number of unique
people who saw your post in News Feed or on your Page, including
people who saw it from a story shared
by a friend when they liked, commented on or shared your post,
answered a
question or responded to an event.»
This is our 10th Annual Letter, and we're marking the occasion
by answering 10 tough
questions that
people ask us.
We marked the occasion
by answering 10 of the hardest
questions people ask us.
«The
answer may be entirely innocent,» Mr. Denton said, musing on the
question of whether Mr. Harder was paid
by someone other than Mr. Hogan, «but I think in order for
people to understand what's going on here, what the stakes are, I think it's important that it be out in public, or at least that he'd be asked the
question in public.»
The issue is perhaps made clearer
by answering the
question: Would I hire the same
person to run my early stage fund as my growth stage fund?
The
question is ridiculous, since yes, the religious leaders (Jews) had a hand in killing Jesus, but the conclusion that modern Jews are responsible is also ridiculous, as well as the insistence on retracting the
question by the ADL, whose whole point is to prevent
people from blaming modern Jews, not whether the
answer is true or not.
Here is my
answer to «who areth you to
question... «A stupid comment
by a stupid
person can not be solved
by a hundred geniuses»... old Chinese proverb... older than god.
All the more reason, then, to be grateful to two Catholic University professors for having assembled a florilegium of brief texts from a century of Catholic social doctrine, and then artfully arranging them as
answers to the real - world
questions asked
by business
people trying to live their professional lives vocationally.
For the followers of the serial podcast produced
by Sarah Koenig: I will make my self available for one interview: 1st, to
answer the
question of the the
people who I hope are concerned with the death of Hae Min Lee (the
person who's paid the ultimate price for Entertainment).
Our eyes will find each other and remind each other, and
by the outrageous grace of God, there is abundantly enough time to make our lives whisper the
answer to every single
person's
question:
Later he would say that «those kinds of
questions [to starve the afflicted child] can be
answered best
by the
people who are right there on the scene, if they think clearly and act responsibly.»
They make assumptions, and ask me to represent all blacks
by answering that age old
question, «what are black
people so mad about?»
The human existential condition does not require that
people be religious or feel the need to address and
answer such
questions — many people appear happy to focus on the present, live as well as they can, and not be bothered by the Big Q
questions — many
people appear happy to focus on the present, live as well as they can, and not be bothered
by the Big
QuestionsQuestions.
He frequently
answers these
questions by utilizing the social understanding of the biblical
people.
Permit me to preface my remarks
by saying that I do not wish to take a position on the thorny doctrinal
question whether we know that some (unknown)
persons will be damned, although I take it for granted» as do von Balthasar and Neuhaus» that Catholic theology does not hold or teach that we know all will be saved, a proposition it is unlikely even the optimistic Origen affirmed with certainty, and is surely difficult to square with Jesus» repeated teaching on the «two ways» (e.g., Matthew 7:13 «14), especially his
answer to the
question whether only a few would be saved.
Just ask a simple
question (its a
question that everyone would agree on that the
question is the exact one to ask to get the truth) and
by the
answer (yes or no) given
by the most knowledgeable / high positioned
persons of that religion, you will eliminate every religion except Christianity.
Of course this is from a random internet troll, and maybe you wanted your
question answered by a religous
person instead.
The environment of a Christian college can be a wonderful place to find
answers to your life
questions because you are surrounded
by people who are listening to the voice of God along with you.
We can
answer this
question by dividing our 1028
by the total number of
people who have lived since the time of these prophecies.
You
question (s) have been
answered numerous times
by multiple
people.
People forget that most of the letters written in the New Testement were in answer to questions from the people in the chruches that were started by the disciples and then the disciples moved on to start new chu
People forget that most of the letters written in the New Testement were in
answer to
questions from the
people in the chruches that were started by the disciples and then the disciples moved on to start new chu
people in the chruches that were started
by the disciples and then the disciples moved on to start new churches.
He responded
by relating the parable of the Good Samaritan, one of my personal favorites... bear traps are hidden, and often unseen till bear or human are caught in them... the traps are deliberately placed, they don't just suddenly appear... the
answer to the
question was the man who had compassion on the man taken
by robbers... he was a social and spiritual outcast who had compassion on someone who in normal circumstances would have hated his guts... because his doctrine and «lifestyle» were not acceptable to the religious establishment... I have had life experiences that bear this out, experiencing love and compassion from
people whom today's religious establishment demonizes and looks down upon... any reading of the Good Samaritan story should be followed up
by a reading of 1 Corinthians 13....
In those periods when clear - cut ideas of the ministry prevailed pastors and
people were relatively agreed on the acceptable
answer to the
question:
By what authority do you do these things, i.e., preach, care for souls, preside over the church and administer the sacraments?
By actual count, less than one third of the
people who attended the postservice discussion were able to make a clear statement of the sermon's central
question and the «
answer» that it offered.
The only logical
answer to the
question as to who could have mentioned all these scientific facts 1400 years ago before they were discovered, is exactly the same
answer initially given
by the atheist or any
person, to the
question who will be the first
person who will be able to tell the mechanism of the unknown object.
A Yes
answer to any of these
questions brought further
questioning as to whether the
person responding thought his or her judgment or impartiality would be clouded
by the circumstances.
The second error is to suppose that there is no right (or rationally superior)
answer to important moral
questions on which
people disagree, or that the right
answer can only be known
by blind faith, not
by reason.
Every so often, I
answer Bible
Questions and Theology questions that people send in
Questions and Theology
questions that people send in
questions that
people send in
by email.
Sister Mary Corita chose to
answer these
questions with the words of William Sloane Coffin: «Because we love the world, we pray now, O [God], for grace to quarrel with it, O Thou whose lover's quarrel with the world is the history of the world... Lord, grant us grace to quarrel with the worship of success and power... to quarrel with all that profanes and trivializes [
people] and separates them... number us, we beseech Thee, in the ranks of those who went forth from this place longing only for those things for which Thou dost make us long, [those] for whom the complexity of the issues only served to renew their zeal to deal with them, [those] who alleviated pain
by sharing it; and [those] who were always willing to risk something big for something good... O God, take our minds and think through them, take our lips and speak through them.
in my opinion I believe that religion was brought on
by a group of
people who realized if they gave the weak a reason and
answers to
questions that could not be
answered then they would rise above.
its a story that has been with us since we started talking and asking
questions... however, the time has come since we can now
answer many of the very same
questions that required a god in the past with science, a bigger
question arises... are
people truly this willing and wanting to replace reality proven
by testible science with a fantasy?
On the other hand, since the nonbeliever is
by no means the only
person excluded from the social and political order in which the traditional witness of faith is implicated, to think of theology as having to give
answer to the
questions of the nonperson is more likely to take account of all those to whom theology owes a serious response.
Before
answering the
question, Robertson acknowledged the statement was controversial
by saying, «I know that
people will probably try to lynch me when I say this.»