Sentences with phrase «people change their theory»

If it's all just alternate explanations that work with the evidence, I would much prefer people change their theory to meet the facts (as the Dalai Lama, for instance, recommends) than keep going with some simplistic idea of «faith».

Not exact matches

Many people have theories why Niantic made these changes — some think the game's three - step tracker had a negative impact on the «Pokémon GO» servers, so they shut down the feature until they could fix the problem — but most people are frustrated not just because this crucial feature was removed, but because Niantic hasn't given any kind of official explanation, and has done nothing to calm worried fans.

You said, «But your theory requires that we believe in two coincidences: first, that it just happens that their life changes, and second, that is just happens to occur right after the person asks God for help.»

The best theory to explain the rate and extent of change we're seeing includes the effect produced by people.

Although he initially rejects physicalism because he thinks that a human person is not just an organism and mental changes are not simply physical changes, he concludes «physicalism is the most reasonable theory about the nature of human beings».

In still other cases certain catchwords and theories of the church - growth people appear in a denomination's literature, but they are either so poorly integrated into the total approach or so changed from what movement theorists Win Arn and Donald McGavran write about that one wonders why the terminology is even used.

Crisis theory, as developed by Erich Lindemann and Gerald Caplan, holds that when a person is in a state of crisis, he is especially vulnerable to change.

Factors in the struggle of a people to exist as a corporate body are set forth in the four - function paradigm of Talcott Parsons.10 Although the adequacy of his analysis is challenged by other theories, especially those focused upon social change, 11 Parsons's model provides a useful delineation of the actions implicated in a group's toil to perpetuate itself.

At 33, to expect this to change or improve may be considered to be very wishful thinking — much like those people who expected a man who has been an unhinged, conspiracy - theory pushing, race - baiting, divisive rhetoric spewing, attention seeking, a ** hole for his entire public life to suddenly change at age seventy when elected President of the United States — so is it possible that it's time to move Lichtsteiner on?

This theory of change is being used to help people across various state agencies, community organizations, and families see how they can promote stronger outcomes for young children and families in the state.

We often refer to this idea as actions embodying a «theory of change:» if people don't believe that signing that petition or signing up to attend an event can make some kind of difference, they won't do it.

Another theory is that people do it not merely because of the chance of changing the outcome of an election, but because it's an act of civic duty, although economist Steve Landsburg, in his popular book «The Armchair Economist», counters «But that ignores the fact that voting takes time away from other more productive acts of civic duty.

He says conspiracy theories about the result of the referendum aren't helping his party's cause, asking: «How do we engage with a very rapidly changing media landscape in which facts are not common and people have their own facts?»

There is still time for Corbyn's supporters to pull back from the edge, reject the seductive embrace of false consciousness paranoia and conspiracy theory, and focus on changing the minds of real people in the country at large.

Decision theory has long struggled with the problem that people are inconsistent (see «The logic of inconsistency»), but Kacelnik argues that apparent inconsistencies in choice can arise simply because our preferences change according to our needs.

«I can't emphasize enough how revolutionary Darwin's theory was and how much it changed people's views in so short a time,» says Jerry Coyne, professor emeritus in the Department of Ecology and Evolution at the University of Chicago.

Climate change and imported disease may have killed them, but most paleontologists accept the theory Martin advocates: «When people got out of Africa and Asia and reached other parts of the world, all hell broke loose.»

Fixing Climate gives a colorful history of a few of the theories and some of the people that have identified the course of catastrophic climate change.

Highly motivated people openly cast doubt on well - established evidence — the theory of evolution, the human effects on climate change, the value of vaccines and other findings that have achieved an overwhelming consensus in the scientific community.

When people feel more powerful, the popular theory goes, behavioral and physiological effects, like changes in hormone levels, blood pressure and heart rate, will follow.

If people put even half of the time, money, and activism into helping autistic people that they do into chasing conspiracy theories, it could change and save lives.

From 2004 more than 268.000 people are changing that theory.

Producer of Animated Theatrical Motion Pictures «Brave» «Frankenweenie» (Walt Disney Pictures) «ParaNorman» «Rise of the Guardians» «Wreck - It Ralph» Producer of Documentary Theatrical Motion Pictures «A People Uncounted» «The Gatekeepers» «The Island President» «The Other Dream Team» «Searching For Sugar Man» TELEVISION Producer of Long - Form Television (David L. Wolper Award) «American Horror Story» «The Dust Bowl» «Game Change» «Hatfields & McCoys» «Sherlock» Producer of Episodic Television, Drama (The Norman Felton Award) «Breaking Bad» «Downton Abbey» «Game of Thrones» «Homeland» «Mad Men» Producer of Episodic Television, Comedy (The Danny Thomas Award) «30 Rock» «The Big Bang Theory» «Curb Your Enthusiasm» «Louie» «Modern Family»

In their upcoming online EdX course, «Unlocking the Immunity to Change: A New Approach to Personal Improvement,» Kegan and Lahey apply their psychological theory that traditional approaches to making changes can ignore the more complicated underlying reasons people behave the way they do.»

Underpinning this mission is their model of youth development, a theory of change that takes young people through self - awareness to empowerment and, ultimately, taking action.

CYFI's Theory of Change proposes that, to achieve full economic citizenship, young people need to be financial capable and socially and economically empowered.

Policies like top - down accountability, No - Child - Left - Behind style, are «hard,» but they have a «thin» theory of change — namely that if we set standards and hold people accountable for meeting them, they will figure out how to hit those benchmarks.

Before this year I was always really intimidated by research, policy, and evaluation — I had never heard of a «theory of change» before — and thought of myself as a small scale, community level «programming» person, believing that those other things just weren't for me.

Change theory includes a concept of change as a process of initiation or adoption, implementation, and institutionalization or continuation.214 According to Fullan (1991), all successful schools experience an «implementation dip,» a drop in performance and confidence when people are faced with innovations that demand new knowledge, skills, strategies, and relationChange theory includes a concept of change as a process of initiation or adoption, implementation, and institutionalization or continuation.214 According to Fullan (1991), all successful schools experience an «implementation dip,» a drop in performance and confidence when people are faced with innovations that demand new knowledge, skills, strategies, and relationchange as a process of initiation or adoption, implementation, and institutionalization or continuation.214 According to Fullan (1991), all successful schools experience an «implementation dip,» a drop in performance and confidence when people are faced with innovations that demand new knowledge, skills, strategies, and relationships.

Our theory of change pivots on the people in our schools.

For now, I see my role as helping people understand their problem and the system that produces it, test possible change ideas as part of their theory of improvement, and fail fast to learn quickly to identify high leverage changes in their local contexts that are actually moving the needle on student outcomes.

Suddenly, we seem to live in a time dominated by «fake news», «alternative facts», conspiracy theories, scepticism of scientific research, partial accounts parading as «the real truth which has hitherto been concealed from us, the people», revolts against allegedly smug academic elites and distant political elites — a time where YouTube videos claiming research into climate change to be a scam get far more viewers than videos presenting the science of climate change.

When abnormal theories begin to get embraced I get concerned that the cycle is changing and that the theory will fail because more people believe it.

For a business, you could also, in theory, assign other people as signing authorities on the business account (e.g. your corporate treasurer), and the individuals performing that role could change over time.

In theory attacking the higher rates first is the ideal and for the people clearly ready to make the changes, it's the way to go.

Another theory is that a dog's detail - oriented vision can detect small changes in the person's movements, changes that humans — even the person about to have the seizure — does not notice.

See a partial list of classesCanine Ethology History of Dog Training Canine Cognition Learning Theory Overview Building Trust and Positive Relationships with Dogs The «Positively» Philosophy Self - Care & Burnout Prevention Canine Emotion and Behavior Canine Communication Canine Body Language Behavior Observation & Discussion Positive Training Tools & Methods Demonstrations & Hands - on Practice of Tools Human Communication Living with Dogs Preventing and Addressing Canine Fear and Stress Mock Group Classes Interpersonal Skills — Working with the Client Dog Trainer as Agent of Human Change Dog Bite Prevention Aggression Working Dogs Positive Training with Other Species Teaching Group Classes Teaching Private lessons Veterinarian Relationships Behavioral Medicine Medical Handling Lab When to Refer / Ethics Dog Law Business Marketing for Dog Trainers And more... taught during the in - person intensives.

- the team has been adding weapons one by one because they want the same amount of attention for each weapon - the team learned that when they added two new weapons at once, one would end up getting overshadowed by the other - there were more new stages than returning stages because bringing back old stages would have little surprise - since they want to satisfy both new and returning players, they changed the order of stage additions - there weren't any major direction changes in balancing from Splatoon 1 - there have been more pattern combinations between weapons and stages, so there was more involved to balance them all - matchmaking is handled by getting 8 players with similar rank points, and then they're split by weapons - the rank point gap between S + players is bigger than ordinary players - only about one in 1,000 active players are in the S +40 to S +50 region in Ranked Battles - there's even less than one in 10 players that reach S +, while 80 % of the overall player base are in A or less - about 90 % of S + ranked players are within a + / -150 hidden ranked power range - rock was the popular genre in Splatoon, so they tried changing it for the sequel - they prioritized making good background music first before forming the band to play that music - the design team would make the CD jacket - like artwork afterwards - due to this, the band members would often change; some getting added while some others removed - Off the Hook is an exception, as they first decided they would be a DJ and rapper along with their visuals first - Off the Hook's song came afterwards - In Splatoon street fashion was the trend, but in Splatoon 2 they tried adding more uniqueness - the aim was to add Flow with ethnic clothing and Jelfonzo with high fashion - all Jellyfish in this world are born by splitting, which means Jelfonzo was born by splitting from Jelonzo - Jellyfish are like a hive mind - when they hold a wedding ceremony, they're just simply holding the ceremony - Jelonzo and Jelfonzo start gaining their own consciences so they can speak - Flow used her working holiday to go on a trip before reaching Inkopolis Square - during the trip, she met the owner of Headspace - the owner liked her, so she got hired to work there - Bisk has a unique way of speaking: anastrophe - the team tried to express him as an adult man - they made him into a giant spider crab because they wanted someone with high posture - he came from a cold country and broke up with his girlfriend to join a band - just like Flow, he became attracted to squids - Crusty Sean finally has his own shop, but he opened it because he's someone who follows the current trends - one of the trends happens to be people opening their own shops - drink tickets aren't stacked, but the probability is higher than a single brand - the music in Inkopolis Square changes depending on the player's location - sounds contribute to creating atmosphere in the location - the song at front of Grizzco Industries had an atmosphere that feels like some smell can radiate from the game screen - as for Salmon Run, they imagined it as a Japanese restaurant outside Japan that is not run by a Japanese person - each time the player moves between the shops, the game uses an arrange shift that shows the personality of each inhabitant - the arrangement in Shella Fresh is related to Bisk's guitar and mystery files that describe his past - with the Squid Sisters moved to Hero Mode, Off the Hook was put in charge in guiding battles and festivals - Bomb Rush Blush has an orchestra «because it would sound like the final boss» - the team wanted to express the feel of the story's real culprit with this music - the probability of each event occurring in Salmon Run is different - there are no specific requirements, meaning they're picked randomly - this means it's possible for fog to appear three times in a row - the Salmon have different appearances based on the environment they're raised in - if the environment is harsher, they would become large salmon - Steelheads and Maws have big bodies, while Scrappers and Steel Eels have high intelligence - Salmons basically wield kitchenware, but everybody else has a virtue in fighting to actually cook the Salmons - Grill is the ultimate form of this - when Salmons are fighting to the death, they can feel the same sense of unity - they would be one with the world if they were eaten by other creatures, and they also fight for the pride of their race - MakoMart is based on a large supermarket in America - the update also took place on Black Friday in America, which was why Squids are buying a lot of things in the trailer - Arowana Mall looks like it has more passages because there are changes in tenants and also renovation work - Walleye Warehouse has no changes at all, because the team wanted to have at least one map that stayed intact - the only thing different in this map is the graffiti, which is based on the winner of Famitsu's Squid Fashion Contest - all members in the band Ink Theory graduated from music university - they are well - educated girls who also do aggressive things - the band members wearing neckties are respecting the Hightide Era from the prequel - the team will continue adding weapons and stages for a year, and Splatfests for two years - the team will also continue to make more updates including balancing

* There is too much conflicting evidence about climate change to know whether it is actually happening * Current climate change is part of a pattern that has been going on for millions of years * Climate change is just a natural fluctuation in Earth's temperatures * Even if we do experience some consequences from climate change, we will be able to cope with them * The effects of climate change are likely to be catastrophic * The evidence for climate change is unreliable * There are a lot of very different theories about climate change and little agreement about which is right * Scientists have in the past changed their results to make climate change appear worse than it is * Scientists have hidden research that shows climate change is not serious * Climate change is a scam * Social / behavioural scepticism measures * Climate change is so complicated, that there is very little politicians can do about it * There is no point in me doing anything about climate change because no - one else is * The actions of a single person doesn't make any difference in tackling climate change * People are too selfish to do anything about climate change * Not much will be done about climate change, because it is not in human nature to respond to problems that won't happen for many years * It is already too late to do anything about climate change * The media is often too alarmist about climate change * Environmentalists do their best to emphasise the worst possible effects of climate change * Climate change has now become a bit of an outdated issue * Whether it is important or not, on a day - to - day basis I am bored of hearing about climate change

Theory insists the bulk of the observed temperature changes over the past several decades were caused mostly by people.

Her unsophisticated chain of reasoning posits that because Nazis killed millions of people and some scientists have speculated that climate change could kill millions of people, scepticism of climate change theory is the equivalent of denying the holocaust.

(even though people have different theories on how to solve the climate change problem, they all agree on a reduction in carbon emissions, and try to pass laws that focus on that.)

These people really aren't at all used to having their dodgy theories exposed to serious scrutiny: that's what «peer review» was for — to protect them from any awkward questions from outsiders by making darned sure it was only sympathetic fellow - travellers on the climate change gravy train who got to vet their drivel.

That was the theory of change informing CarbonWA, the group Bauman founded: Craft a policy that can unite people who care about climate change, from the left and the right.

I don't know, I'm not part of that conspiracy, and I see a lot of assertions on here and elsewhere by people who imply they are smart, or at least smart enough to know more on this issue than the climate scientists who actually professionally study it, who throw around large highfalutin science terms, but that repeatedly misconstrue the basic climate change issue itself, conflate the process of science with Climate Change refutation, seem to have an extensively poor understanding of the issue, and take small select bits of data as part of the ongoing total picture of increasing overall corroboration, to falsely equate that with a flaw in Climate Change theory itself, or as a referendum change issue itself, conflate the process of science with Climate Change refutation, seem to have an extensively poor understanding of the issue, and take small select bits of data as part of the ongoing total picture of increasing overall corroboration, to falsely equate that with a flaw in Climate Change theory itself, or as a referendum Change refutation, seem to have an extensively poor understanding of the issue, and take small select bits of data as part of the ongoing total picture of increasing overall corroboration, to falsely equate that with a flaw in Climate Change theory itself, or as a referendum Change theory itself, or as a referendum on it.

People who denied scientific propositions such as the link between AIDS and HIV or climate change and human activity were more likely to subscribe to conspiracy theories like Princess Diana was murdered or AIDS was created by the government.

Former UK Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs David Miliband presented a rebuttal of the main points of the film and stated «There will always be people with conspiracy theories trying to do down the scientific consensus, and that is part of scientific and democratic debate, but the science of climate change looks like fact to me.»

By «a theory that didn't suit the people who follow this site» you must be referring to the Alarmists» idea that our C02 is causing all manner of global disasters, and will, if not curtailed lead to global catastrophe, meaning we must immediately change our sources of energy to far more expensive ones, costing trillions.

If any of the religious - zealot scaremongers could do that, the facts would be plainly clear and stand on their own, and the «experts» wouldn't be developing «Information Task Forces» and other propaganda gimmicks to convince the majority of people (yes, the majority) that the theory is correct, that «climate change» is killing us all, that we can do something about it, but, alas the majority of us are just too dumb to understand it.

It is using the theory of punishment rather than reward to change the way people think.