After reading the comments on this article, it becomes clear why there are so many different beliefs that
people consider Christian.
Today, in countries such as the United States, even through the majority of
people consider themselves Christian, it is «the rich and famous» who are most admired and emulated.
Not exact matches
Brand templating system Templafy CEO
Christian Lund reiterates, «A hiring manager is usually the same
person, no matter who is being
considered, while the HR department can field many representatives, or ambassadors, for the initial interview.
Wouldn't these
people be
considered «
Christian Extremists» or even «
Christian Terrorists»?
Do you know the mathematical impossibility that even one of these could randomly come into existance?Let alone all of the building blocks required for just a single simple cell to come together to form any type of living thing?There sure should be some blobs of fossilized transitions if evolution could happen.You
people are real smart why don't you quit bashing
Christians and quit believing the garbage you have been fed, and look up the evidence put forth by the Creation Research
people.They have in fact proven creation down to a cellular level.Unlike evolution scientists who have no answers, but cleverly devised fables.Evolution is not even a very good fairy tale.Even if I didn't believe in God, Evolution is such a fools explanation of the origin of man that it takes just that to even
consider it true.I understand though that you athiests will believe anything that allows you to love your sin and hatred of the one true God.
I'll leave that to
people with horrible morals like
Christians who believe in might makes right and subjective morality that allows god to do what they would otherwise NEVER
consider to be moral for another being.
Does that mean that if a
Christian does something that I
consider «mean», the problem is in my perception, that it wasn't really mean, or does it mean that the
person is not a «true»
Christian?
If not, then by your logic shouldn't you
considering there are more
people who are muslim than
christian.
I mean: of course I
consider myself a
Christian, and I begrudge some
people that title for various theological and sociological reasons, and of course I would count some
people out of that circle (and some of them would object).
It's interesting to see how
people will find their own truth, dig in their heals and be blind to any other idea... What would Jesus do is an interesting question... I
consider my self a
Christian and a spiritualist... because I believe it's just not as black and white as one religion or another thinks... there is way more grey area... but a fundamental truths that are a good rule to live life by, wether you are christian or not... treat others the way you want to be treated... do unto others... I am my brothers keeper... a
Christian and a spiritualist... because I believe it's just not as black and white as one religion or another thinks... there is way more grey area... but a fundamental truths that are a good rule to live life by, wether you are
christian or not... treat others the way you want to be treated... do unto others... I am my brothers keeper... a
christian or not... treat others the way you want to be treated... do unto others... I am my brothers keeper... all apply.
According to the work produced by David B. Barrett's religious statistics organisation (FYI, the man was a
Christian no less) atheists number more than Jews, Sikh's, Shintos, Baha'is, Jains, combined, and if you want to
consider all «non - religious / secular / agnostic / atheist» together, since the whole «non-religion» movement is kinda riddled with
people who find conontations of words like «atheist» to be bad enough to not want to declare themselves atheist, you'll find the number of that non-religious group also amounts more than those religions plus buddhism, and taoism or even Confucianism.
Too many
people around the world
consider themselves
Christian, but in name only.
Any time I see the two words, «
Christian» and «Treatment», used together, I tell the
person considering such «treatment» to run, not walk, away — as far away as they can.
While I don't like the word «Cult» being used so much for any religion that differs from scrict interpertation of the bible, Mormans are not
Christians, the same way Jewish
people would not
consider Christians Jews.
It outlines a number of areas for
Christians to
consider and advises
people to vote for a party that is interested in «reversing the accumulation of power and wealth in fewer and fewer hands, whether those of the state, corporations or individuals».
They were
considered a dishonor to the family but no one will call this an honor killing since the
person doing it was
Christian or white, sad but true.
I no longer
consider atheists my enemies, they're generally just
people trying to get through life like me, many of whom have experienced abuse from
Christians so - called and thus (in my opinion) have tragically thrown out the underlying message.
If the
people in the days of the prophets failed to recognize them as prophets, but instead condemned, accused, judged, criticized, and killed them, and if the
people in the days of Jesus failed to recognize Him as the Messiah, but instead condemned, accused, judged, criticized, and killed him, then maybe... just maybe... the way to recognize a messenger of God to us is to look at who we
Christians like to condemn, accuse, judge, criticize, and kill... and then
consider that maybe... just maybe... these
people are God's messengers to us.
Obviously, that's subjective — and
Christians who follow it would certainly disagree — but suggesting that
people don't read it seems misguided
considering how influential it remains.
The vast majority of
people under 35
consider Christian resistance to gay marriage as «wrong and wicked»... More
I think
people are still not voting for Mitt Romney because he is Mormon, and they don't
consider him
Christian.
Right... Just like
people who buy books by a guy (Christopher Hitchens) who says atheist communists should be
considered theists and Martin Luther King was not a true
Christian... and who lost debates to William Lane Craig and Rowan Williams are not gullible.
The
people who began this debate were not
Christian; they were Hellenic philosophers who also
considered themselves what we moderns would term «scientists.»
The married
person must always
consider his or her spouse before making decisions, but singleness gives the
Christian a greater degree of freedom to serve Christ.
Another travel companion, Vijayesh Lal, the gregarious new director of the Evangelical Fellowship of India, wrote to me in a recent email that increasingly «
Christians are treated as outsiders and targeted because they are perceived to be outsiders, i.e.,
people not proclaiming India as punyabhumi [holy land], although many
consider India their pitribhumi [fatherland].»
Furthermore, the story reminds us that
people who worshiped the one monotheistic god of Abraham (
Christians, Jews and Muslims alike) were all
considered societal outcasts in 7th century Arabia.
Nevertheless, quite apart from the ill informed attacks upon something which never was the
Christian Faith, there are some legitimate criticisms, made by sane and thoughtful
people, which must be
considered.
If you knew intimate details about my own past and the deep hurt I've endured, you would apologize — or maybe you wouldn't care at all; after all, most never
consider that kind of thing, though their past encounters with «
Christians» is enough to justify their life - long disdain for them in the eyes of the
people that applaud them.
Is it any wonder that
people view
Christians as sheltered and out - of - touch when a sentence like this is
considered vulgar?
The concerns that surface when one
considers piety or the quality and depth of the seminarian's relationship to God and other
persons include: (1)
Christian community, (2) spiritual formation, (3) vocational study, (4) ecumenical fellowship, (5) corporate worship, (6) personal witness and (7) community service.
Would that
person be
considered to have erred in the same manner a
Christian may err, say by stealing?
They can restate the
Christian belief in heaven in a way that invites
people to
consider it anew.
If the
people are predominantly
Christian then the leaders must
consider Christian beliefs in their actions as a leader and the legislation passed.
In his discussion of prayer for an evil
person, Rabbi Soloveichik misunderstands what I would
consider to be the
Christian view.
We are Independents and have always voted for the
person we
consider to be the best
person, BUT this writer has much to learn about what a
Christian should be and do.
I have been a Christiany for many years and I don't know any
Christian in my community or any pastor in my church who would
consider the killing or harming of any gay
person to be something that God would like us to do.
That would disqualify many
people both here in the US and around the world who definitely
consider themselves
Christians.
at the council of nicea, the catholic church threw out at least 40 other gospels that many
people of the time who also
considered themselves «
christians «revered.
I
consider myself a
christian, with religious knowledge and general knowlege, however I do not hold to a set of views dictated by an organized religion, I believe the organized religions are where we have gone wrong, as someone pointed out earlier to most «religious
people» to question ones faith or organization is wrong but that is exactly what the bible tells us to do... test ALL things to see what is true.
Actually Brehvik does not
consider himself a
christian in his words, «in the strictest sense», so the first part of your point is moot... Secondly I think a fairer statement would be that not «all» muslims are violent extremists, as many who don't live in western countries are, as their book does instruct them to kill any and all who do not procalim allah as the one god and mohammed as his prophet... As far as having extreme passion for one's beliefs, if someone was truly to be an «extreme»
christian that
person would be completely loving as this was Jesus» command to love both God and everyone... to take that to the extreme would mean «extreme» loving, like the radical kind of love that caused Jesus to endure the cross for the sins of us all... includinig the man who committed this atrocity and yes any and all of the muslim's who have committed similar things.
To the folks who are vehemently denying this
person was a
Christian, I would urge you to
consider this: If a
person with a muslim name commits an act of terrorism, he is immediately labelled an «Islamic» terrorist, no questions asked, even though the Quran clearly states that a
person who kills an innocent is like he / she has murdered then whole of humanity (the Quran mentions this in reference to murder of ANY innocent
person, irrespective of the victims belief): To quote from the Quran: «On that account We ordained for the Children of Isra`il that if any one slew a
person — unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land — it would be as if he slew the whole humanity: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the whole humanity.
i didn't
consider the consequences, i thought that Grace was Big which it is big but it dosent cover willful sin i find website that talk about that willful sin and they say nothing comforting to calm me down and the scripture also condemn these acts i am a foolish
person who commits sin i'm not a
christian if i was i wouldn't commit willful sin.
The early
Christian thought
considered these as inspirations of the Divine Word and Spirit that is present to all
persons through human history.
In what follows, since we can not
consider all these things at once, we shall make our keynote the need to impart to the
people a true and vital system of
Christian belief.
Did Dave Ramsey
consider faithful
Christians, pastors in communities too small to support a pastor... or the fact that a 3000 church can pay
persons that are not head pastors such low wages that they have to seek gov. Assistance... are these
people shuned by God despite their dedicationn to a ministry position that does not get the prestige of the head pastor position.
I think it is sad when
people refuse to intellectually and sincerely
consider the claims of Christianity because they have been offended by the behavior of
people who call themselves
Christians.
When you
consider that out of the 3000
people killed, 2,996 of them were
Christians, I just don't see where AA has a chance here.
We have seen what this gospel or «good news» consists in; we have looked at the
people to whom it is to be proclaimed; we have
considered the preacher and the setting in
Christian worship in which the proclamation is normally made.
I don't understand why so many
people are willing to dismiss Mr Obama because they are convinced he's not a
Christian, despite him saying he is and acting like he is, but they give a pass to Mr Romney who is openly Mormon, which is
considered by the majority of
Christians to not be
Christian.
Have you ever
considered that the reason why so many
people throughout the ages have taken issue with
Christian beliefs is because they have some genuine concerns?