Sentences with phrase «people derogatory names»

Not exact matches

They didn't call me derogatory names, troll me or attempt to make me feel inferior like some groups of people on here have.

I've asked questions about evolution on here before, and had people start calling me derogatory names.

I've seen people just question it and get called derogatory names.

I am often speaking to an individual about someone they strongly dislike (even hate), and rather than refer to that other person in any way, either by their actual name or even some derogatory name (that fool, that idiot, that moron), the person I am talking to will simply say something like, «I can't stand to be around that... any longer!»

Why are people to disparage the name of my God, yet if I say anything derogatory about muhammad or allah it's called «hate speech?»

Be kind people, there is really no need to call others derogatory names to make your point.

LANGUAGE 10 - About 78 F - words and its derivatives, 26 sexual references, 2 obscene hand gestures (one delivered by a young girl), 44 scatological terms, 18 anatomical terms, 20 mild obscenities, 3 derogatory terms for homosexuals, name - calling (retard, idiot, bad person, loser, fat, tweeker, moron, dumb, stupid, frigid), 8 religious profanities, 17 religious exclamations.

You may not use the Site to develop, generate, transmit or store information (including, without limitation, Content) that: (a) in the sole and absolute discretion of Undead Labs, is deemed to be offensive; (b) is deemed unlawful, harmful, harassing, fraudulent, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, hateful, sexually explicit, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable, nor may you use a misspelling or an alternative spelling to circumvent these restrictions; (c) consists of advertisements, promotions, solicitations, chain letters, pyramid schemes, investment opportunities or other unsolicited commercial communication; (d) is derogatory or harmful to the reputation of the Site, Undead Labs, or our directors, officers and employees in any way; (e) encourages the violation of any local, state, national, or international laws or regulations; (f) solicits other users» passwords and / or credit card information; (g) is anti-social, disruptive, or destructive, including, without limitation, «flaming,» «spamming» and «trolling»; (h) carries out any action with a disruptive effect, such as causing forum screens to scroll faster than other users are able to read, or setting up macros with large amounts of text that, when used, can have a disruptive effect on the normal flow of forum postings; (i) contains any user's personal information, including, but not limited to, such user's real name, address, phone number or private e-mail address, except that a user may communicate his or her own personal information in a private message directed to a single user; (j) forges headers or otherwise manipulates identifiers in order to disguise the origin of any message (k) in any way obstructs or otherwise interferes with the normal performance of another person's use of the Site; (l) constitutes harassment or a violation of privacy or threatens other people or groups of people; (m) is harmful to children in any manner; or (n) constitutes phishing, pharming or impersonates any other person, or steals or assumes any person's identity (whether a real identity or online nickname or alias).

Don't attack people on a personal level — don't call them names, imply derogatory things about them, or tell them to hurt themselves or others.

At the time it was untitled, and attracted the derogatory and racist nick name «The Yellow Peril», which many people still know it by today.

One person commenting on the Frontiers» website asked for the «full details of the investigation,» saying the paper had been «derogatory and insulting» by naming people as conspiracy theorists who were «merely pointing out errors in the previous paper»... John Cook, a researcher at the University of Queensland and a co-author of the second paper, said the Frontiers» decision to retract the work might have a «chilling effect» on research.

Some of the numbers may not Blue laws in some areas date to the early 1600s, getting their name from the use of «blue» as a derogatory term for rigid moral codes and «blue noses» for the people who adhered to them (I wonder what that says about Rudolph?).