Come for the occasional sneak peeks behind the scenes on the new Star Wars, stay for the inspirational stories of young
people getting into film production!
Not exact matches
When I am about to walk
into a situation like that in front of 90,000
people and being
filmed for TV, my nerves
get on the edge because there are so many things that can happen that I can't control.
The moment the
film got into the
people who believed that cell towers and mobile phone transmissions made them ill; I just shook my head — really didn't need the «crazies» showing up in this brilliant piece of work.
So it turns out that it doesn't matter that all the promo material on the
film — TV ads, trailers, everything — reveals the story's twist — Lincoln and Jordan and all their fellow citizens aren't survivors of a global disaster but rich
people's insurance policies — because all that happens after the secret is revealed is that Bay can finally
get down to doing what he loves to do: Stomp and crash and burn and destroy as Lincoln and Jordan escape
into the real world — just 20 minutes
into our future — and must be recaptured.
Between the unlikely things
people would say knowing full well the camera is rolling and the lousy emo warbler music, we
get a
film that takes a serious subject and turns it
into easily - dismissed after - school special.
I feel as though this
film is a genius picture on many levels, due to its manipulative styles and ways of
getting people into the theatre.
Throwing Tom Cruise
into the middle of explosions and out the window of the world's tallest building will tend to
get people excited for the early IMAX release of the fourth Mission: Impossible
film.
Rather than collecting a bunch of funny
people together on a set and just letting them riff, the
film establishes coherent characters and drops them
into a twisty mystery plot that's tightly crafted enough to generate some real narrative momentum while never
getting too bogged down in its own plot that it forgets to be funny.
The story
gets too ridiculous at this point to even be satirical or reasonably credible, it is just bad
film - making; but, it does try in its unclear and scrambled way to blame the media and the rich
people who control it, for not being risk takers and offering fresh arguments
into the political fray.
Having never been much of a fan of genre labels, the idea that this
film should be judged differently because it has female stars irks me a bit, but if that
gets more
people into theatre seats and away from the junk that typically qualifies as «entertainment for women,» I'll happily embrace it.
Unless you're one of those
people that is taken completely by surprise when you see a flock of birds in a
film and they end up pooping on someone, usually as the punctuation to a scene to embarrass or
get revenge, this is scraping mighty low in the gag department to turn this
into a comedy.
Whatever it takes to
get more Studio Ghibli
films into this country and in front of
people of all ages, I'm down with it.
As one
gets into the
film, however, the title takes on added significance as it becomes clear that although the weather may have been glorious, there was not a glorious unanimity of purpose among all the British
people towards the onrushing conflict with Hitler's Germany.
So while the
film's opening act probably
got people like this guy extremely excited, the movie falls apart the deeper the characters descend
into the titular pyramid.
The
film starts off with some awkward, painfully lame flashback scenes of Kyle's childhood and transitions
into an opening act that is loaded with full - on patriotism that sees him go to war to
get back at the
people who brought suffering to our doorstep in the events of 9/11 (he was already enlisted, but if we believe the
film that decision was also motivated by seeing news footage of American lives being taken), but one of the most interesting surprises is how balanced it eventually becomes and how we see the way that Kyle's actions negatively impact others and how even he begins to question his commitment to the cause, despite the fact that he would never vocalize it.
What a tedious
film.Over acting, wobbly plot, dialogue at times pure drivel and a laughable ending.It really was poor.The
film goes straight
into a Cul de Sac and can not
get out.Way too much nudity from the metro sexual looking Tilda Swinton.Her androgynous body quite turned my stomach.A redeeming feature was the glorious sunshine and powerful light of Italy.The
film meanders, wobbles and finally falls down.Older
people like Swinton and Fiennes should really keep their pants on at all times.It is acutely embarrassing when the oldies need to do so much nudity (l suspect it is to appease their insecurity that they might not be physically desirable anymore) Horrible attempt at
film making
Before the
film's release, The A.V. Club spoke with Rudd about
getting into character, his off - screen relationships with his onscreen siblings, and the similarities between Our Idiot Brother and the one movie from his past
people are always eager to discuss.
This is a
film that definitely improves as it goes along — the beginning is treacle - y slow and it's quite hard to
get into the story, something which isn't helped by the fact that Petit doesn't seem like a particularly nice man; focussed, passionate & dedicated yes but a little lacking in the
people skills department.
And then the camera
gets closer and closer until, as you say, it goes
into her POV and switches the
film's POV from third
person to first
person.
«I wanted to help new
people develop their skills so that
films of a personal nature would
get into the marketplace.»
The heyday for American
film criticism was the»70s because I think the
people that
got into it at that point were really inspired by the likes of Andrew Sarris and Pauline Kael, both of whom became famous and established the importance of
film critics as a cultural force.
The photo above shows the crowd of
people waiting to
get into the new Woody Allen
film, as taken from the top of the red carpet stairs.
It's too long, descends
into a riot of silliness towards the end and sometimes takes the easy road of making
people laugh by just
getting everyone to shout a lot but it's still one of the funniest
films of 2013.
Do you see that as an obstacle to
getting the
film into larger markets or do you think this is a
film that
people are prepared to see?
some
people are being picky and trying to pass themselves of as a know it all
film critic... if you went
into this movie with your brain in anything higher than 1st gear you are a fool, i went looking for a bit of action and a salute to a cult classic and i
got what i wanted @ 25 «if anybody thinks either Topher Grace or Adrien Brody could stand - up to a Predator seriously needs to consider suicide.»
Oftentimes a critic's impassioned praise for a smaller, independent
film is not enough to
get people into the seats, and therefore the movie's impact is mostly missed.
You're looking to your left and you're seeing the
people who made the
films that
got you
into the game in the first place.
Mazursky also put a lot of himself
into the
film as writer - director, and literally puts himself in as Simms» mother, although most
people may not quite
get the joke if they don't recognize Mazursky (apparently Mazursky cast himself at last second when he couldn't find a suitable actress for the part in time).
Here, Thor is one of the funniest
people in the movie, always leaning
into the strangeness of his surroundings, and Waititi mostly
gets away with putting his voice
into Thor's mouth because A) Hemsworth is this character, so we can buy anything he does; and B) No previous
film had defined Thor enough.
People have criticised this
film, saying that it's hard to
get into and difficult to empathise with but I couldn't agree less.
Even more than whatever networking and / or friendly conversations happen between
people in party situations, it's the experience of being able to share our thoughts and feelings about a movie right afterward — talk about, work through it, maybe even
get into (hopefully) friendly disagreements over it — that, for me, are the most memorable experiences a
film festival can offer.
In the first
film, Rocky (Jane Levy), Alex and Money are three Detroit thieves who
get their kicks by breaking
into the houses of wealthy
people.
While the plot itself is reminiscent of many dinosaur
films since the 1920s, even throwing in an exploding volcano for good measure, it takes a bit to
get into as we're thrust
into a situation where one group of
people is attempting to hijack another group of
people.
XX Year: 2017 Directors: Roxanne Benjamin, Annie Clark, Karyn Kusama, Jovanka Vuckovic, Sofia Carrillo It's important that the scariest segment in XX, Magnet Releasing's women - helmed horror anthology
film, is also its most elementary: Young
people trek out
into the wilderness for fun and recreation, young
people incur the wrath of hostile forces, young
people get dead, easy as you please.
In fact, by the end of the
film, the mystery of Jodorowsky's project to us wasn't how he managed to
get so many
people to tumble
into the tornado with him.
Industry professionals who have worked on BAFTA winning and high profile
films, TV programmes and games such as Les Misérables, CBBC's Show Me What You're Made Of and Batman: Arkham Knight will give first hand insights
into how young
people can
get their talent noticed, the skills required to forge a successful career and the training opportunities available.
The
film industry can reach out to include the use of very interactive books which include the very rich contain you
get when you make a
film and effectively drive
people into the box offices.»
Nightly events include special panels with big - name
people from the
film industry, which are a great chance to
get a peek
into «movie - making magic» and see some really major stars.
Nightly events include special panels with big - name
people from the
film industry, a great chance to
get a peek
into movie - making magic, and see some really major stars.
A lot of
people say I am too harsh when it comes to the Michael Bay
films but after the first one, it just kept
getting farther and farther away from the franchise I grew up on
into a poorly put together
film with sophomoric level comedy forced
into it.
It was about creating an intimacy within the space to experience and watch the
film, inviting
people into bed like sculptures and duvets to
get wrapped up in.
If you'd like to support a worthy documentary, which will help bring permaculture to more
people and potentially convince a wider audience of the importance of this regenerative discipline, a pledge of $ 25 will
get you a digital download of the
film, and a pledge of $ 45 will
get you a signed copy of the DVD (which also includes 3 hours of footage from site visits that didn't make it
into the
film).
(We'll
get into all that in a later piece, once more
people have seen the
film.)
I'd seen this
film a long time ago but when I saw it again this time, I had a much better appreciation of the Aboriginal way of being and the thing that really struck me in this
film was there was a section of the
film where they were going to do this aeroplane song and dance corroboree and they were
getting ready for it and you know there are all these Elders and you know very wise and respected Elders you know making their costumes they were gonna wear, talking about how it was gonna be and in amongst all these
people there's little children you know of one 1 or 2 or 3 years old who were just crawling around and you know watching and listening, trying on their head - dresses and they were completely welcomed
into that adult community, there was no sense of, you know this is grown up business, you kids go off and play which is very much the western model.