In some ways, it's about two good
people going to war with each other.
Let's move ahead I don't see
people going to war with bow and arrows those times are gone, the Roman Empire was great using bows and arrows but now it's guns and nuclear weapons but in our case we go to war with sticks and wipes hoping to defeat teams with Guns and nuclear weapons..
One of the early ideas of the whole thing was: What happens when two
people go to war, and they're both in the right?
Not exact matches
«A trade
war on steel and aluminum is
going to help a small number of
people and it's
going to hurt a lot more and drive up prices, said Mary Ann Hurley, vice president, fixed income trading at D.A. Davidson in Seattle.
They hadn't
gone back
to raise money in a few years, so maybe that would have been a good time
to go to market and raise a
war chest and set aside a bunch of
people to try and do the full innovator's dilemma salvation plan.
«I can only say this, when I came into office
people thought we were
going into nuclear
war and now they're saying wow this is
going to be taken care of,» Trump said.
Aid groups report that more than six million
people have died in the past decade as casualties of the
war, and yet the conflict
goes largely unnoticed
to the Western world.
A happy team is a productive team, and when
people believe in their leader, they'll
go to war for him.
«Most
people that were in their 40s and 50s fought in [the Iran - Iraq
War in the»80s] and really hated Iran and were very concerned that Iran was now
going to take over Iraq, basically.»
He also said companies should try
to find replacements within the organization, but the
war for talent means more are
going to the market
to find the right
people.
With massive and increasing structural deficits; exploding debt in all sectors; hostile demographics; social and political fracturing and disintegration; grotesque wealth inequality; extraordinary global trade competition; a complete collapse of respect for vital government organizations such as the Justice Department and FBI, which the
people now realize have
gone rogue; an extremely complex and corrosive global geopolitical environment; the real prospect of
war, potentially nuclear and worldwide; not
to mention numerous additional factors, we can only point
to few other times in history more dangerous
to the
people's financial welfare, and therefore more overall bullish for gold, one of the only financial sanctuaries proven
to work in times of dislocation.
and yes sometimes
War was the only choice because whoever (the jews at that time) were
going to come after them and take control and try and wipe out Muhammed and his
people.
This is all about control with religion and it has
to stop.Gay
people getting married doesn't have anything
to do with straight
people getting married.
People are so full of hatred and disrespect it isn't funny.I'm glad this has come out now, because it really shows how evil
people really are.But these
people who are so into GOD, the Bible, Church, and the only way of life they live 4 god, by god are the 1s who prmote
going around the world starting
WARS, killing innocent women, men, children and families because Jesus guides them in everything they do.That is a crock of B.S. if I ever heard it.They will continus
to use GOD and continue their EVIL ways
to get whatever they want and CONTROL who ever they can.
However, when such a
person expects us
to go to war because «God told him
to tell us,» well — nope; sorry dude.That's not
going to happen again — not around this place anyway.
I served this country, volunteered for
war, and now am left
to deal with idiots like you who want
to see stories like this, read some kind of republicanized twist into everything, blame Israel and Obama for your own personal failures (
to include turkey farms - which I abhor unless free range), then
go ahead: you're embarrassing yourself, your family, and every good
person, Jews included, that you know.
This also does not account for other recent
wars such as WWII, WWI, Vietnam, Korea, U.S. Civil
War, etc., though arguably religion played a significant role in affecting people's opinions about going to w
War, etc., though arguably religion played a significant role in affecting
people's opinions about
going to warwar.
Further the death of this
person is not
going to stop an ideology - i think this burning hatred for american and western policies will remain and this is where the real
war needs
to be waged - that is
to change the minds of the
people.
Your second paragraph exactly outlines the reasons countries and
people can so easily
go to war with others they do not have direct relationship with..
I am looking for a
person who will keep us out of
war, make corporations bring back the good paying jobs we all used
to have before they
went to India and China and who knows where else and who will restore civility
to the nation.
Jesus
went to war with power in order
to build relationships with
people who needed an advocate.
starman are you referring
to the new enlightened world where
people are still allowing each other
to starve and there are still hundreds of active
wars going on as we speak?
Uncouth: No, my point is that religion influences human decisions, whether that is
to go to war,
to torture
people, etc..
while the writer has little knowledge of the bible, he is also greatly lacking what he should know
to write such a article, the laws give
to people of all walks of life is the commandments given by moses, religion does not have anything
to do with goverments laws or rulings, he told us straight the one law that there is no forgiveness for is murder, rulers and goverments take it upon themselves
to make the decision whether
to go to war, or if a
person should be put
to death, as far as jesus and the apostles are concerned thier labours was a work of love and true humanitarian towards all
peoples, races, religions, they never asked for anything for themselves, and they never took from one
to give
to another.
How did «the lord» get the word out when he was commanding his
people to go to war or
to follow a commandment.
Even if the only alternative was subugation for these other
peoples, there were consequences for the Isrealites if they didn «t fully follow the command
to anihilate if the other
peoples choose
to go to war.
But if God truly does have a violent and bloody side then Jesus was being deceptive, for nowhere in His life or ministry did He reveal God as someone who
goes to war against His enemies or commands the genocide of
people who do not love or obey Him.
His being asked
to go preach in Nineveh is the equivalent of a Jewish
person being asked
to go preach
to Nazi Germany during World
War II.
Finally, the researchers asked Americans, «How [do] all of the
people in the world feel about the U.S.
going to war with Iraq?»
1 Corinthians 11:14 (Men should not have long hair) 1 Corinthians 14:34 - 35 (Women should remain silent in church) Deuteronomy 13:6 - 16 (Death penalty for Apostasy) Deuteronomy 20:10 - 14 (Attack city, kill all men, keep women, children as spoils of
war) Deuteronomy 21:18 - 21 (Death penalty for a rebellious son) Deuteronomy 22:19 - 25 (Kill non - virgin / kill adulterers / rapists) Ecclesiastes 1:18 (Knowledge is bad) Exodus 21:1 - 7 (Rules for buying slaves) Exodus 35:2 (Death for working on the Sabbath) Ezekiel 9:5 - 6 (Murder women / children) Genesis 1:3,4,5,11,12,16 (God creates light, night and day, plants grow, before creating sun) Genesis 3:16 (Man shall rule over woman) Jeremiah 19:9 (Cannibalism) John 3:18 (He who believes in Jesus is saved, he that doesn't is condemned) John 5:46 - 47 (Jesus references Old Testament) Leviticus 3:1 - 17 (Procedure for animal sacrifice) Leviticus 19:19 (No mixed fabrics in clothing) Leviticus 19:27 (Don't trim hair or beard) Leviticus 19:28 (No tattoos) Leviticus 20:9 (Death for cursing father or mother) Leviticus 20:10 (Death for adultery) Leviticus 20:13 (Death for gay men) Leviticus 21:17 - 23 (Ugly
people, lame, dwarfs, not welcome on altar) Leviticus 25:45 (Strangers can be bought as slaves) Luke 12:33 (Sell your possessions, and give
to the poor) Luke 14:26 (You must hate your family and yourself
to follow Jesus) Mark 10:11 - 12 (Leaving your spouse for another is adultery) Mark 10:21 - 22 (Sell your possessions and give
to the poor) Mark 10:24 - 25 (Next
to impossible for rich
to get into heaven) Mark 16:15 - 16 (Those who hear the gospel and don't believe
go to hell) Matthew 5:17 - 19 (Jesus says he has come
to enforce the laws of the Old Testament) Matthew 6:5 - 6 (Pray in secret) Matthew 6:18 (Fast for Lent in secret) Matthew 9:12 (The healthy don't need a doctor, the sick do) Matthew 10:34 - 37 (Jesus comes with sword, turns families against each other, those that love family more than him are not worthy) Matthew 12:30 (If you're not with Jesus, you're against him) Matthew 15:4 (Death for not honouring your father and mother) Matthew 22:29 (Jesus references Old Testament) Matthew 24:37 (Jesus references Old Testament) Numbers 14:18 (Following generations blamed for the sins of previous ones) Psalms 137:9 (Violence against children) Revelation 6:13 (The stars fell
to earth like figs) Revelation 21:8 (Unbelievers, among others,
go to hell) 1 Timothy 2:11 - 12 (Women subordinate and must remain silent) 1 Timothy 5:8 (If you don't provide for your family, you are an infidel)
Today, there are 65 million displaced
people, the most since World
War II, and 795 million
people still
go to bed hungry every night.
A «pro-life»
person, if not a pacifist, would be very reluctant
to go to war, recognizing that
war is not inevitable and that there is nothing in human nature that inevitably leads
to war.
Childress argued that
war is fundamentally morally problematic, as the killing in
war goes against the prima facie duty of benevolence, which rules out killing or inflicting harm on other
persons: «[B] ecause it is prima facie wrong
to injure or kill others, such acts demand justification.»
As we grapple with a new
war fought against a Muslim threat and new efforts,
to control and transform a conquered
people, history can provide insights not only into where we have been, but into where we may be
going.
I prefer
to speak a clear spoken language that does not tie up a
persons faith
to eternal
wars that GOD warns us against the new world order but those same fundie evangelicals are the ones who
go against the BIBLE and builds the events of the end times in GODS name ven thogh GOD says he is against it anyway!
For example, when Mark says that
war / conflict is inevitable, I would agree with your argument that if it is absolutely wrong
to ever
go to war, then Christians should still refuse
to do so even if other
people are
going to — except that I don't agree with your assumption that it is absolutely wrong
to ever
go to war.
People refusing medical treatment because they think they can pray disease away, The demoralizing way religion makes you feel about yourself (I am a wretch, a sinner, a bad
person by nature), the religious
wars that have been fought for millenia, the self righteous passing laws based on THEIR beliefs (change
to the pledge of allegience which now excludes anyone who does not believe in a fairy godfather, the change
to the national motto that turned it into the lie «in god we trust», the bigotry that «my religion is the right one and you are wrong so I'll pray for you» kind of crap... don't you realize that it is insulting
to me when someone says they will pray for me... its the same as saying I'm
going to do something for you but there won't be any effect, so it is just a waste of time.
The Archbishop of Canterbury, Most Revd Justin Welby has described the work of foreign correspondents and
war reporters as a «God - given calling
to inspire others
to serve our common humanity», which helped motivate
people to care about what was
going on elsewhere in the world.
People traveled across the Atlantic and founded a new country
to get away from religious intollerance and eventually
went to war over it.
I agree, EVERY time
people in a country overreact we should just
go over and
go to war with them.
And it was one of good Christians that tricked the media and Congress and the
people into
going to war with Iraq under a threat of a mushroom cloud.
It makes no sense
to me
to go to war on condoms and birth control pills when there are no ethical
people left on Wall Street.
Let's
go back
to enslaving
people, keeping our subservient, baby - making, barefoot women in the kitchen, and a general state religion - fueled intolerant
war.
We actually started as a secular nation, we
went along for a little, had a civil
war which killed a bunch of
people,
went merrily along for a few more years, got mired in 2 more world
wars, then inserted GOD int he 1950's into the pledge and on the money
to protect ourselves from communists (because that somehow protects us from communists) and then we've been
going along ever since.
But these same
people you speak of are also the ones that will say they're «pro-life» but then be pro death penalty (though I'm not against the death penalty myself in certain cases) and usually are all ready
to go to war, don't support programs that help these children once they are born, etc..
So wait you aren't
going to blame what was obviously Politics on Religious
Wars lets not forget that there were a few things involved in these «
Wars of Religion» and I am sure most historians will agree with me, firstly the Crusades weren't thought up as some ideological crusade
to protect Christians from some horde of Muslims coming from the east, they were in - fact land grabbing and trying
to stave off the eventual fall of what is now known as Istanbul, secondly I highly doubt that most of the average religious
person had any idea just how politicized the church became during this time period or up until probably John Paul the II took over, I mean the Thirty Years
War could have been called a Religious war under this Videos silly assumptio
War could have been called a Religious
war under this Videos silly assumptio
war under this Videos silly assumptions.
People having choices taken away from them, freedom of and from religion completely
gone, women being bumped down
to near second class citizens, religious
wars with and against other theocracys.
He defends the «ahistorical nature» of the just
war doctrine, but surely for
people who seek
to go to war justly it makes some difference what kind of society they think is capable of doing so.
how do you who worships a man that feed the poor healed the sick without billing them (which is a very liberial thing
to do) find your home in the right wing of the republican party which has no concern for the
people who are hungry or sick and loves
going to war a the drop of a hat?
If we all stop believing in God, we will probably stop
going to church, and then we will lose friendships we had at church, then
people will be less happy, then more crime will occur, then
war will occur, then we will all die.
Coming out as a gay man puts an unnecessary target on a
person who is trying
to go into a
war (literal and figurative) and report the news without the suspicion that the news will now be tainted — maybe gray and no longer black and white...»