Sentences with phrase «people had less money»

Unfortunately, just about the time that people had less money to spend on vet care for their animals, the cost to see a vet was going up significantly.

Spitzer's side countered that U.S. companies weren't hiring at home because people had less money to spend, stagnating the economy overall.

It's more susceptible to economic ups and downs — people have less money to gamble with during a recession — and the firms also have a lot of exposure to real estate.

You can say that you can buy «less houses» with your salary, but you can't say that people have less money: S

Since discretionary spending — spending on things like a nice dinner out, a movie, or a luxury item like a new television — dips when people have less money, the additional taxes paid by Americans could presumable hurt business» ability to both hire new employees and be successful in the first place.

Not exact matches

According to a study by Michael Norton of Harvard Business School and two colleagues from the University of British Columbia, the amount of money people earn has less influence on their happiness than how they spend it, and those who spend at least some of their money on others are happier than those who do not.

We all know people who are less successful than they'd otherwise be because they spend their entire lives chasing enough money to live.

Money is finite, and presumably many people will donate less to other charities if they have donated to ALS.

Taxes on tobacco products have also continued to rise, making it even more difficult for young people with less money in their pocket.

As backward as it sounds, getting rich often has less to do with the money than the mentality, he writes in his book «How Rich People Think.»

Research shows that fearing or accepting risk is a behavior people learn, and people who've grown up in households that are always one paycheck away from eviction are less likely to have learned to take risks with their money.

«People have come back from maternity leave, and they don't want to work 80 hours a week — they're ok making less money to work less,» he says.

In the September 2016 Harvard Business Review article, researchers say people who work for a company that has been enmeshed in scandal make less money when they leave to work elsewhere.

If both sides, through their eyes and their people's eyes, have concluded that the plaintiff is absolutely going to win this case, and the plaintiff is going to get a lot of money because they're totally on board with everything that has been presented, then that might be a good reason for the defendant to agree to a settlement with the plaintiff for less money than the potential exposure if the jury comes back and finds willful infringement.

Because people are living longer, «we have a middle - age retirement system where less money is going to the truly elderly,» Steuerle said.

Remember, if the government gives us a tax cut they'll still have to make up the budget shortfall somehow, chiefly by selling more bonds to American citizens (who happen to be the same people getting the tax cut) or foreigners (who will raise the money by selling us more of their goods and services, or buying less of ours).

With people needing less money than they think, as long as you have the required credits you'll have guaranteed income after 62 if needed.

This is perhaps why less than 50 % of people have even tried to calculate how much money they will need in retirement, according to the retirement confidence survey from the Employee Benefit Research Institute.

«The more people use the buyback option over the two - year vesting period, if the project is failing, the less money [that] will ultimately be available for the team,» he explained.

«I have way, way less money than people think!»

Legally reducing your tax bill means putting less money in the hands of people who have an uninterrupted track record of destruction and failure.

because if you have a almost * pure * intent, to serve people, and if you stick to that intent, and could care less about money....

Here's why: I know that if people get more business from LinkedIn because of what I'm showing them, it's going to help them make more money in less time, and that in turn will give them more time to do what they love and have a better life — travel more, get more family time... whatever that might be.

«Since the recession banks have had less money to lend and have put in place strict lending criteria, which has resulted in some people over the age of 70 being refused a mortgage.

Many of these myths seem to be the result of wishful thinking; the world would be a much nicer place to do business in if we all had less paperwork, paid fewer taxes and had people showering us with free money.

One of the key ideas underlying a 401 (k) is that most people drop into a lower tax bracket when they retire and stop earning a salary, so that when they pull money from their 401 (k) they're paying less tax than they would have paid on that money while working.

So if we started to get inflation that's going to create a real problem for the central banks because they won't be able to emit in the quantities of currency they've been emitting because that will fuel inflation and inflation of course destroys capital, it destroys the savings, it destroys the purchasing power of wages and people actually have less money to spend, less purchasing power.

«These accounts are built to give people tax benefits in saving for college and people who aren't using them are missing out on those tax benefits and potentially have less money for college when it comes time to pay for that,» said Stuart Ritter, a certified financial planner with T. Rowe Price.

People who are nervous about money backed by a central bank with unclear controls — such as China's — have become attracted to bitcoin, an open source currency that is less influenced by the state of the economy or any looming geopolitical risk.

You know I'd care less about people complaining about taxpayer money going to the poor if income was actually determined by work.

It feels so good making so much money when other people have to work for so much less.

Yeah because the $ 35,000 a year or less that 90 % of preachers make for having to spiritually and emotionally guide people is so about just being in it for the money.

Having just left the employ of a company that seemed to promote only Catholics (one affiliated with Santorum no less), I have no great love for so long for seeing these people get any more money or power.

I might be ecelectic, but what makes me consistent is my belief is something that combines the belief of Scripture with that of Englightenment philosophy: nurturing life is goodness, simply, and helping others to see a model that thinking for ourselves can help heal the world of all past injustices - so that we all learn to WANT to be good... within reason and by our own choice...: you have a society like that, you'll have less injustices, less violence, less money - grubbing by people who hold themselves as representatives of «authority» -(which side are you on, by the way, if you see the world as so divided in such a bipolar reality...?)

The more people choose to not have a big family & teach catholicism, the less money.

People sneer at the former communist true believers who have now become capitalist managers, and they make snide comments about foreigners who migrate from Eastern Europe and are willing to work for less money than Germans are.

That said, what I really, really despise, is the TV Evangelists that would ask for more and more money, and guilt it out of people... and of course, the most vunerable are the elderly or sick shut - ins that often would send their old age pension, and barely eat, thinking that they were doing good... and the TV Evangelists could care less that they were literally taking food money from them.

Ordinary people have stepped up in great ways, donating their time, money and talents toward helping those less fortunate.

Yes of course have understood what you meant after all the country is a country of all Egyptians whether Muslim or Christian or Jewish if any... those all have suffered for 30 years in the hands of this dictatorship which cared less for the people of Egypt only was there a greed for their money beside the control of their life and destiny... but above all only people with true faith can achieve what they have achieved, as people with no faith have not that will and power within granted by God to his believers...

Forget it S21, trying to get Atheists / Liberals to have a cogent thought is like trying to get Democrats / Liberals to spend less of other people's money... impossible.

Let me be clear about one thing: I do not hold people who are ambitious and who do have a love for money in any less regard than anyone else.

I know some people have goals this new year to eat more meals at home, to eat healthier, or to spend less money on takeout, so this is a perfect time to share this recipe — it can take care of all three of those!

I didn't realize that quinoa has become less available to the peoples of South America because it makes more money being sold overseas, but it makes sense.

Does that mean a person with less money has less opportunity to see «Hamilton»?

just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way

Shame on you naive fans that still confused that the cowardly board are having any impact on what's happening on the pitch, that's ok, but I happen to think there's a direct correlation between those people and the fact that despite more money and greater resources we have become less competitive.

Marriage has become a system where the person who makes more money, shall pay the lesser earner enough so that incomes are rendered equal in the eyes of the state.

A spokesman said in an email that the company hasn't identified a trend in the U.S. toward people changing diapers less often, though it has observed parents trying to potty train their youngsters earlier to save money.

He wants a flat income tax, for example, which would mean taking more money from poorer people and less from the rich.

There is a deep and fundamental difference between government giving someone other people's money, and govenment taking less of their own money, having nothing to do with semantic games of calling both «welfare».