Sentences with phrase «people heard both sides»

I think that once people hear both sides, they can make their own conclusions and deserve to be spoken to with respect.

Not exact matches

I've heard from several young people lately that they're excited by the possibilities of the technology sector and want to start their own businesses, but aren't sure how to go about learning the technical skills to help them succeed — or whether they need to know the technical side in the first place.

Yet when we surround ourselves with like - minded people or only hear similar complaints, it's hard to ever consider the other side.

When you hear about Bitcoin regulations, you are hearing about the fiat / banking side of things, where regulators want to impose restrictions on how people buy and sell bitcoins [using fiat currency], including taxes, fines, and fees.

Let's hope that when the Supreme Court hears oral arguments on the case on October 2, the Justices will side with regular working people like Hobson, not with the big bosses and corporations who want to use the fine print to rig the rules against the rest of us.

I hear about the other side, the «anti-choice» people who want to control women's reproduction, forcing them into dark alleys or unwanted pregnancies and lives they never asked for.

I'm honestly asking — when I do not know these people or their story, but I do know the murkiness and agony of divorce — is it wrong of me to not want to rush to grab a pitchfork after hearing just one side in a series of anecdotes derived from a divorce?

GW can be a christian yes but there are some people who are catholics and christians and jehovas and atheist and so on that don't understand their wrong doing, saying God is on my side to go ahead and kill millions of innocent woman and children based on lies while the truth is for oil, that's not a real christian in my book, There's plenty of serial killers out there that says they've heard God telling them to kill.

One concern often heard is that if the name «Saint Gilbert» had appeared on his books, Chesterton never would have attracted as many readers — or as many converts — as he has: It is precisely his approachability as an ordinary person, they say, which has won so many people over to his side; making a him a saint could risk that.

I don't know many people who are interested in hearing Scientology's side of the story because they're full of it, why would I want to hear any lies from the racist cult of mormonism?

And just like with partisan American politics, if we take one misstep — or even use a wrong term — people on both sides won't hear anything we're trying to say.

Whether in private conversation, group discussion, a sermon or a speech, or in the interaction within the community, the question is whether there is, on the one side, conviction about what the gospel means and, on the other side, unqualified readiness to hear the other people and see the world from their point of view.

What an ironic stmt to hear from someone that represents the side that too often equates the character of a person with the kind of church they attend and how often they are in the pew.

if you can lie to yourself with immunity, you might be an atheist if you think the indifferent support your side, you might be an atheist if you don't think at all, you might be an atheist if you are drawn to religious discussions thinking someone wants to hear your opinion, you might be an atheist if you copy paste every piece of crap theory you find, you might be an atheist if you think you are right no matter what the evidence shows, you might be an atheist if you can't hold your water when you think about science, you might be an atheist if you can't write the word God, with proper capitalization, you might be an atheist if you think your view has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you think The View has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheist.

So I'm sending out an alert: even though this seems difficult for some people to understand, when space is given for a person to share their experiences and be heard and even believed, this does not necessarily mean I am taking sides.

The revivalists retorted that the Old Side would not allow the people to hear converted pastors.

You hear about disillusionment on the Dem side, but not people defecting to the Repubs.

Who defines equality under the law, does the right to display openly a persons faith and a persons right to not have to hear it, either side have ultimate standing?

And the people keep coming every sunday for that little spiritual hit, that pat on the back and the message they want to hear «You are special, any bad deeds weren't your fault as you can blame them on Satan, and you get to live for eternity at the universal creators side, all for just a fiver...»

I am actually shockingly pleased to hear it because so often I think believers want to take the hard - line, schoolyard tactic of «atheists killed more people» just so they remain «cleaner», because they think non-believers are saying their «side» is totally clean by criticising the concept of religious warfare.

Hundreds and thousands of people who have been stripped of all they possess and who have the right entirely on their side will at last be heard.

On all sides of conversation between people who prefer one or another title for themselves, I hear claims that make sense to me as one Christian among many.

I'm not an atheist but I don't know where you heard that b.s.... and just as a side note, if you call yourself a «christian» and make comments like that, it's no wonder alot of people (including me) can't stand you hypocritical hatemongering Jesus freaks.

I heard folks on both sides say they didn't care if the solution was one state or two state or no state — as long as all people were treated equally and with dignity.

Lying is a uniquely dangerous sin, because it is a double - edged sword: On one side of the blade is the person who is knowingly attempting to deceive people; and on the other, are people who hear and believe the lie — separating themselves from the truth.

Franklin is concerned with politics, which, no matter which side he's on, automatically turns off half of the people who hear him.

I have heard some sections of our support angrily claim to «not care» what happens to our side this season, with certain individuals insisting that our failures this term would make sure Wenger leaves, with those people trying to justify their acceptance of a bad year.

Plus i haven't looked into it but i've heard / read plenty of people say he's pretty obnoxious / off putting on the personality side of things whenever he's brought up.

Clearly, Janes felt that if people only heard his side, and saw that JRW had broken rules, he would be vindicated.

For a long time, there was only one thing people knew when they heard the name Coss Marte: By age 19 he was making $ 2 million a year as a drug kingpin, selling weed and ecstasy and cocaine and crack on the Lower East Side, right around the corner.

Hear me tllk and notice how soon people will come out on this side, and claim things like.

The guy's second cousin on his mother's side went to college with a guy whose older brother went to San Diego State and they heard from some people in a pizza parlor that Kawhi sais he is definitely, 100 %... oh, wait, I forgot what he was doing.

Though we often share or hear about the experience that persons of the LGBT community have had when coming out, one film seeks to focus on the other side of the experience: parents.

I don't know what I'm looking for — mostly I guess to hear that other people have gone through the same thing with their kids and come out the other side with their sanity in tow.

One, I just felt that there were many people who would like to hear the «dark» side of how this organization came to being.

A person might say they never wanted to hear these gritty details but the truth is it makes everyone feel a little more normal for the gross side of pregnancy.

Even though it's hard to hear the other side, let go of the judgments and adopt an «it is what it is» attitude, you stay connected to people who will speak the hard truth verses tell you what you want to hear.

On the flip side, brains of people who didn't have children were more active when they heard a baby's laugh.

It is unfortunate to hear that there is divisiveness within the professional community, but it is understandable too because that is their world so you will always have spectrums that people are on and we have it in the mom world with the extremist on both sides, formula feeding, and breastfeeding.

It is much more disturbing that there can be so much variation within one hospital: Going to Ein Karem was a totally reasonable choice for a mother who wanted to be with her babies a lot — it worked for you and for many other people (myself included; when my son was born there I had him by my side from his birth to our discharge other than when I asked the nurses to watch him while I took a shower), but then you hear nightmare stories like this one.

BY DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE FOR COUNTY EXECUTIVE DAVID FRIED As a former Judge in Spring Valley, when making a ruling, it's critical to know all sides of an issue, to understand and hear people out.

As a former Judge in Spring Valley, when making a ruling, it's critical to know all sides of an issue, to understand and hear people out.

He however regretted that the Federal Government by its actions against his person had convicted him in the court of public opinion even when his own side of the story has not been heard as demanded by the Constitution of the Federal Republic Nigeria.

And that in turn requires voters coming together in person to hear different sides, get all the facts, discuss in a constructive way and come to reasoned conclusions.

For all but the most trivial legislation (using a resolution of some kind honoring some guy you've never heard of), the LA is the person who reads the bill, gathers the research, and must present both sides to the member.

The City Council is in the midst of weeks of hearings on de Blasio's executive budget, while Johnson and others continue to push their top priorities — the property tax rebate, reduced price MetroCards for people living in poverty, and an added $ 500 million into reserves — for inclusion in the adopted budget, which the two sides must agree on by the July 1 start to the new fiscal year.

This is not the tune that Nigerians were used to hearing from their all - powerful Coordinating Minister of the Economy, the first person ever to hold such a grandiose title side by side with the powerful Finance portfolio.

Have you ever heard the doorbell ring, and didn't know if the person on the other side was a friendly guest?

According to the World Health Organization, 360 million people have disabling hearing loss, a condition that is often considered to be an unavoidable side effect of aging.

Sounds were manipulated in various ways, simulating high - frequency hearing loss and single - sided deafness, as well as to check carefully that people were not finding cunning ways to use the echoes with one ear.