Not exact matches
Of course, these biblical passages have
in mind,
in particular, the transmission of a
religious tradition: the story of God's care for his
people.
As Jacques Dupuis put it, Vatican II affirmed positive elements not only
in the personal lives of
people of other faiths but
in the
religious traditions to which they belong.
The confusion on the Assembly floor
in Vancouver reflected the fact that Christians have not been enabled to think theologically about the
religious faith of their neighbors, as believing and praying (or meditating)
people with a spiritual history and
tradition of their own.
The factors of chief importance
in the development of this theology were: (a) the Old Testament — and Judaism --(b) the
tradition of
religious thought
in the Hellenistic world, (c) the earliest Christian experience of Christ and conviction about his
person, mission, and nature — this soon became the
tradition of the faith or the «true doctrine» — and (d) the living, continuous, ongoing experience of Christ — only
in theory to be distinguished from the preceding —
in worship,
in preaching,
in teaching,
in open proclamation and confession, as the manifestation of the present Spiritual Christ within his church.
But we must make our case
in publicly accessible terms that appeal to
people of good will from a variety of
religious traditions and those of no
religious tradition.
(Using the lowercase «c» with reference to «christianity» is a spiritual discipline for me as a member of a
religious tradition so arrogant and abusive
in its exercise of power over women, lesbians and gays, indigenous
people, Jews, Muslims and members of nonchristian religions and cultures.)
For
people whose ethical views are based
in a
religious tradition, that choice seems monstrous.
Whenever pluralism becomes too content with a relaxed model of «dialogue,» it can ignore the need for conflict and the actualities of systematic distortions
in the personal (psychosis), historical (alienation and oppression) and
religious (sin) dimensions of every
person, culture and
tradition.
The skills of effective communication and relating should be at the center of the entire process of theological education, since these skills make it possible to bring the riches of a
religious tradition to life
in the experience of
persons.
At the level of assumption, the historical consciousness is the awareness that every event or entity (including
persons or
religious traditions) possesses its own finite, historical context and can be explained exhaustively
in terms of that context.
It did not occur to many
people in the 19th century that there might be truth, integrity or value
in a
religious tradition other than Christianity.
I also take quite to heart the ways
in which the
religious tradition lam part of has fomented, exacerbated, and then walked past much of the suffering caused by
people and institutions that have claimed to be the very messengers of God.
«Lesbian and gay
religious need to reclaim their
tradition, publicize it, rejoice
in it, and share it with other Christians and gay
people,» he writes.
It is also important for the evolving
religious life of thousands of
persons dissatisfied with the
religious traditions or congregations
in which they find themselves.
Clearly, it is within the canon of most
religious traditions themselves to regard their followers as a pilgrim
people whose tents must always,
in a sense, be
in motion through the wilderness.
Today we live
in a different world, where
people of different
religious traditions live together side by side.
Is it a problem, a defeat for our religion or do we discover that the interrelationship of
people of different
religious traditions is of benefit for our life as human beings
in this global village?
The Editor
in the Preface says that the Tract «polemises against a form of narrow sectarian Secularism which refuses to be sensitive to
tradition and faith» and argues that Secularism needs to be rethought taking
religious faith seriously, that «only then can Secularism reclaim the ideological space which Fundamentalists are threatening to take over, only then can Secularists capture the minds of the
people» (p.vi).
There are,
in the midst of fragmentation, signs of a changing society
in the context of
religious plurality, where
people of different
religious traditions are instrumental
in building new communities and where interreligious dialogue promotes a new understanding of the other.
Yes, this was evidence that God also was upset about what this man named Jesus was teaching, and had seen fit to make Him a public spectacle
in the sight of all so that nobody would ever again seek to challenge the teachings of the
religious leaders or the
traditions of the Jewish
people.
The United States has a strong
tradition of welcoming the persecuted, from its founding when
people were fleeing
religious persecution
in Europe to now where we've resettled refugees from over 40 nations
in partnership with local communities.
«More so than for any other
religious tradition, a
person can become UU because of what he already believes rather than believing what he does because of becoming a UU,» said James Casebolt, coauthor of two papers on the regional survey read at the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion annual meeting
in October.
The question of whether Christians and Muslims worship the same God is not only a question about Muslims but one about all
peoples of whatever
religious tradition who raise their hearts and hands
in prayer to the Divine Other.
In many cases they are the only representatives of a school's religious tradition, and in some cases they are the only individuals a young person will encounter who will say proudly (albeit subtly) that they believe in Go
In many cases they are the only representatives of a school's
religious tradition, and
in some cases they are the only individuals a young person will encounter who will say proudly (albeit subtly) that they believe in Go
in some cases they are the only individuals a young
person will encounter who will say proudly (albeit subtly) that they believe
in Go
in God.
While some
people whom I would include
in this mode of thought are involved with «
religious studies,» particularly at the undergraduate level, and see autobiographies as a valid way of introducing students to different
religious traditions (and I would agree that it is a valid way), the main drive, I believe, is focused on the central task of theology — serving the hearing of the word of God
in a particular time and place.
If a basis for the ruling is not found
in the Qur» an or the
Traditions, then it should be sought
in the general agreement (ijma) of the
religious leaders, and that general agreement should be followed by all the
people.
Otherwise, the churches of the Christian
tradition will have nothing to say to
religious seekers
in a culture where
people are free to believe anything they wish about God... and do.
If they are from a biblically conservative
tradition they are likely to use selected references to sexuality, marriage, and family to communicate the ideals of God
in a way that will encourage and motivate
people to strive for the ideal.6 This didactic use of the Bible fails to distinguish the radical difference between family life and the
religious practices of ancient and modern cultures.
Reviewing the exegetical search of the early writers involves, then, for those of us who have come into the inheritance of these
traditions, the responsibility not only to interact with these inherited
traditions, but also to interpret these
in the context of the «extratextual hermeneutics that is slowly emerging as a distinctive Asian contribution to theological methodology [which] seeks to transcend the textual, historical, and
religious boundaries of Christian
tradition and cultivate a deeper contact with the mysterious ways
in which
people of all
religious persuasions have defined and appropriated humanity and divinity.»
For this
tradition nourished over the centuries the slow emergence of the ideal of a civilized politics, a politics of civil conversation, of noncoercion, of the consent of the governed, of pluralism, of
religious liberty, of respect for the inalienable dignity of every human
person, of voluntary cooperation
in pursuit of the common good, and of checks and balances against the wayward tendencies of sinful men and women.
David L. Schindler criticizes the liberal view of the human
person that he sees encoded into the American project
in First Things, to which Richard John Neuhaus responded with a more positive view of our national heritage,
in which
religious faith and a strong
tradition of civic associations moderate the excesses of liberal individualism.
This understanding happens
in the combination of intra-
religious and inter-
religious dialogue, that is,
in the dialogue between different religions and among different
religious traditions within one human
person.
lol, yes clay i am an atheist... i created the sun whorshipping thing to have argument against religion from a
religious stand point... however, the sun makes more sense then something you can't see or feel — the sun also gives free energy... your god once did that for the jews, my gives it to the human race as well as everything else on the planet, fuk even the planet is nothing without the sun... but back to your point — yes it is very hypocritical of me, AND thats the point, every
religious person i have ever met has and on a constant basis broken the tenets of there faith without regard for there souls — it seems to only be the
person's conscience that dictates what is right and wrong... the belief
in a god figure is just because its
tradition to and plus every else believes so its always to be part of the group instead of an outsider — that is sadly human nature to be part of the group.
This meant for the earliest disciples a basic renunciation of the struggle for existence, implemented by a complete break with the power structure of society: the automatic prerogatives of the chosen
people, the security of the holy
tradition, the comfort of established
religious organization and clergy — all such props, controlled by man and as a result constantly available to him for securing his existence, were
in principle eliminated.
«
In Britain we have a long
tradition of freedom of worship and
religious tolerance, where many
people of different faiths follow
religious codes and practices and benefit from their guidance.
A lack of interest
in people's
religious lives apart from the congregation has not, of course, characterized every
religious tradition in every period.
Significant numbers of millennials (young
people born
in the 1980s and 1990s) will continue to walk away from socially conservative
religious traditions.
Then,
in words which call on the central motifs of the civil
religious tradition, Reston thanked the Charlottesville citizen committee for suggesting «that a responsible society must have a common center to which the loyalty and trust of the
people are bound, and that these fundamentals must be defined and discussed among the
people and put right before the bicentennial of the Declaration
in 1976.»
«Christians... are not interested
in horizontal conversions - a mere change from one's
religious tradition to Christianity, leaving the
person on the same level of character and way of life.»
In the Jewish
religious tradition these purity rules formed a closely interlocking network which clearly marked off the sacred precincts of the Temple, the holy land of Israel, and the covenant
people of God (or groups of the «separated» within the
people), from the «profane» world
peopled by the «demon - ruled nations» outside.
It is acutely painful to biblical religion today, because many
people, seeking a way to express their conscience
in society, are led to reject any «
religious» expression of it, because they identify these corruptions of the biblical
tradition with all
religious expression.
«So moderate
people of faith, those of you who can endure the cognitive dissonance of espousing progressive politics while gleaning support
in religious traditions that are thousands of years old — I ask you to please speak up.
The whole world may come to participate more or less imperfectly
in the universal mission of Christ and the Church: the Eastern Orthodox churches, Protestant ecclesial communities, the Jewish
people, Islamic monotheism, the great world
religious traditions that are not always explicitly monotheistic, and even secularists through the workings of the moral conscience by which human beings are led to seek the true and the good.
The
people of Nineveh, as a certain ancient
tradition affirms, are often already repenting
in ways that we, the self - consciously
religious, have yet to see.
This much at least may be conceded, that along with the academic
tradition of detached secular study of religion, there is growing
in both Christendom and elsewhere a religiously related scholarship of
religious diversity.30 To some extent
in the future these studies, it would seem, are to be carried out by
religious people for
religious people.
«Jews, Christians, and Muslims
in the world pray to the same God...» Yes, this is true if you look at the holy writings and
traditions of these faiths — but
in 2010 it's «My God can beat up your god» Catholics, Baptists, Hasidim Jews, Reform Jews, Sunni and Shia Muslims all have their own «personal» gods now — I know there have always been
religious splits, but
in our Instant Communication world it's easier than ever to divide
people by stirring up emotions.
When young
people grow up
in a more or less homogeneous society, where parents,
religious leaders, and schools all confidently communicate traditional values, they may rebel to some extent, but they are also likely to assimilate much of the
tradition.
In particular I should learn whatever I can from persons who have been formed in other religious tradition
In particular I should learn whatever I can from
persons who have been formed
in other religious tradition
in other
religious traditions.
The real myth,
in other words, may be that there can be
religious freedom at all
in the modern state without a strong
religious tradition acting both as a curb to the state's power on behalf of believers and nonbelievers alike and also as an alternative narrative within which
people can work out their individual visions of the good life.
Even so, such
people are often accused of having a «hidden
religious agenda» because of the remnants of the Hebrew - Christian
tradition in the schools»
religious values, holidays and customs.