Sentences with phrase «people in dialogue»

«This UKAD accreditation will be another step towards increasing that education process and actively involving young people in a dialogue about their lifestyle choices.
In face of this growing dominance of economics over other aspects of human existence, traditional Western political categories — those which define a body politic in which the people in dialogue hammer out conclusions that express their values — need to prove their relevance all over again.
Instead, he recommends trying to avoid language that separates when engaging people in dialogue.

Not exact matches

Riding in Ubers requires a different set of dialogue chops: when banter lulls, be the first person on the planet to ask the Uber driver if it's fun to drive for Uber.
If we connect with people about what we have in common — sports teams, TV shows, interests — it is easier to have dialogue about what we disagree on.
The 9th Dialogue was held in Singapore last week (4 - 6 June, 2010) with defence officials from 28 countries attending, including the US Secretary of Defence Robert Gates, the Deputy Chief of the Peoples» Liberation Army (PLA) of China, the National Security Adviser of India...
In addition to this training program, Starbucks will work with the community to leverage existing programs that help connect young people with internships, apprenticeships and jobs, and foster the type of dialogue and engagement needed for continued social change.
In - person meetings or telephone dialogues are the most common way ICCR members conduct their corporate engagements.
While not always in agreement with academic commentary on Professor Hogg and Allison A. Bushell's dialogue theory, I would suggest that the primary audience for this case is Canadian governments (and the people that elect them).
Regardless as to what Trump accomplishes, the dialogue is now firmly rooted in the consciousness of the people, not just in the US, but globally.
Let me be clear; I believe the majority of people are civil and respectful in their online dialogue.
As far as ignoring someone, can you imagine a situation in which you realize that further dialogue with a person would be completely useless?
This is one of the problems that often hinders dialogue with radical atheists (not sure you are one, but you did answer a question I posed to people who believe God is a fantasy)-- rather than offer a defense they will attack in such a way as to obfuscate the purpose of the original discussion.
It is in understanding of this point that major Jewish thinkers such as Leo Baeck and Martin Buber came back to Germany after the war to engage in dialogue with the German people.
They've been very involved in interfaith dialogues for many years; in fact, they're just the kind of Muslims we should be looking at and encouraging dialogue with because they've been doing it for 10 years... Some people are trying to convince the Imam to focus on the multi-faith aspect of this and perhaps dedicate the whole institution to the victims of 9/11.
«I think what is happening is that people in our government are looking at artists, musicians, filmmakers, writers and songwriters, saying, «Wow, look at all this pull and influence they have,» and so they wisely opened up a dialogue,» Bergquist says.
ACN is helping local Church leaders to stand up for people's rights by providing support at the Inter-Religious Dialogue Centre in Khulna.
I encouraged the Church to engage in a compassionate, respectful and honest conversation about our attitude and response towards lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and transsexual (LGBT) people; a respectful dialogue that might lead to our churches becoming beacons of inclusion.
The openhearted observer of Islam in the West can discern the shape of hope in the increasing willingness of people of the two faiths to come together for dialogue and consultation on the mutual problems they face; in the reevaluation of Islam forced upon Muslims by their minority status in many places; and in the development of the concept of international law and universal human rights.
In about 2000/2001 I was in Austin to dialogue about emerging ministry, and facilitate a «culture clash» simulation game based on values and beliefs of people from the kinds of «postmodern cultures» that I'd been interacting with since the early 1990In about 2000/2001 I was in Austin to dialogue about emerging ministry, and facilitate a «culture clash» simulation game based on values and beliefs of people from the kinds of «postmodern cultures» that I'd been interacting with since the early 1990in Austin to dialogue about emerging ministry, and facilitate a «culture clash» simulation game based on values and beliefs of people from the kinds of «postmodern cultures» that I'd been interacting with since the early 1990s.
I liked the dialogue between the people and the priest, and I liked the mass in the vernacular so I could understand what was going on.
In the period when I went to the World Student Christian Federation as a secretary, in 1947 religious scientists worked within the thesis in Martin Buber's I and Thou that separated the scientific I - It approach to things and the knowledge of persons through dialogue and mutual lovIn the period when I went to the World Student Christian Federation as a secretary, in 1947 religious scientists worked within the thesis in Martin Buber's I and Thou that separated the scientific I - It approach to things and the knowledge of persons through dialogue and mutual lovin 1947 religious scientists worked within the thesis in Martin Buber's I and Thou that separated the scientific I - It approach to things and the knowledge of persons through dialogue and mutual lovin Martin Buber's I and Thou that separated the scientific I - It approach to things and the knowledge of persons through dialogue and mutual love.
«The excessive segmentation of knowledge, the rejection of metaphysics by the human sciences, the difficulties encountered by dialogue between science and theology are damaging not only to the development of knowledge, but also to the development of peoples, because these things make it harder to see the integral good of man in its various dimensions.
God lays on him only one commandment, a commandment that is a word of God and therefore also both a gospel and an element in dialogue between persons.
Jesus often referred in his conversations / dialogues with people as «My son», My daughter» etc. depending on who it was he was talking to.
The real test of dialogue is whether people in one faith community can make their own the prayers of another faith tradition, without making faith traditions predatory or obsolescent.
For in this case a person would want to conduct a Christian theological dialogue while arrogating to himself the right to determine what is Christian.
Among most Christians and Jews, it is fair to say, the Jewish - Christian dialogue is viewed as something of a curiosity carried on by people who are «interested in that kind of thing.»
In an interview with Premier Christianity, Monsignor Halík, who is committed to engaging in dialogue with people of different beliefs and cultural traditions, said he received the award on behalf of his teachers, many of whom suffered under the Soviet regimIn an interview with Premier Christianity, Monsignor Halík, who is committed to engaging in dialogue with people of different beliefs and cultural traditions, said he received the award on behalf of his teachers, many of whom suffered under the Soviet regimin dialogue with people of different beliefs and cultural traditions, said he received the award on behalf of his teachers, many of whom suffered under the Soviet regime.
Working for the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai Brith, Bernards was going around the country, much in the manner of an itinerant preacher, alerting people to a new thing under the sun, «the Jewish - Christian dialogue
Whenever pluralism becomes too content with a relaxed model of «dialogue,» it can ignore the need for conflict and the actualities of systematic distortions in the personal (psychosis), historical (alienation and oppression) and religious (sin) dimensions of every person, culture and tradition.
The various themes of re-conceptualization that emanated in the new period includes mission as missio Dei, mission as «Christian presence,» mission as «witness» in and to the six continents, mission as development, mission as liberation, mission in relation to dialogue with people of other faiths and non faiths, mission as contextualization and inculturation.
Thus each of the participants to the dialogue is in process, continuously growing in knowledge of self, other human beings, the world, etc., and the interaction of these persons in process as individual beings constitutes the broader process which is the community.
We have a lot of work to do... My hope is [to] help foster better dialogue between Christians and atheists and that, together, we can work to see a world in which people are able to have honest, challenging, and loving conversation across lines of difference.
No, what American Catholics are happy about, or should be, is that the pope is bringing Christianity into the dialogue with secularism in a way that doesn't alienate the people he would like to introduce to Christ via grace and mercy AND that he is doing so while maintaining the firm teachings the Church holds on moral matters.
While the first - person perspective is preferable in a dialogue with Zen, the third - person perspective also has its merits.
Is it akin to the post-Holocaust Jewish - Christian dialogue in the U.S., within which people find their own religious identity strengthened as they abandon a negative portrait of the other religion?
Genuine conversation is most often found in the dialogue between two persons, but it also occurs occasionally in a dialogue of several voices.
Nor can it be genuinely founded if it thinks in terms of the «dialogue» between states rather than between peoples, between the representatives of states rather than between the responsible and tested leaders of genuine communities.
(Ibid., p. 89) Only the philosophy of dialogue makes possible an adequate picture of what does in fact take place: the pupil grows through his encounter with the person of the teacher and the Thou of the writer.
A genuinely reciprocal relationship demands that man regard himself not as an object of God's thought but as a really free person — a partner in dialogue.
A debate in which the thoughts are not expressed in the way in which they existed in the mind but in the speaking are so pointed that they may strike home in the sharpest way, and moreover without the men that are spoken to being regarded in any way present as persons; a conversation characterized by the need neither to communicate something, nor to learn something, nor to innuence someone, nor to come into connexion with someone, but solely by the desire to have one's own self - reliance confirmed by making the impression that is made, or if it has become unsteady to have it strengthened; a friendly chat in which each regards himself as absolute and legitimate and the other as relativized and questionable; a lovers» talk in which both partners alike enjoy their own glorious soul and their precious experience — what an underworld of faceless spectres of dialogue!
Neither is mission simply dialogue with people of other faiths in the hope of bringing them to Jesus.
The intramural dialogue over what Mark Noll has called «the scandal of the evangelical mind» worries that intellectually serious people have passed evangelicals by while we were allured by the sensations of revivalism, seduced by a materialistic market - driven culture, overtaken by the «disaster of fundamentalism» in the face of challenges from modern science and technology, and robbed of our universities through negligence and the inertia of secularized education.
There are, in the midst of fragmentation, signs of a changing society in the context of religious plurality, where people of different religious traditions are instrumental in building new communities and where interreligious dialogue promotes a new understanding of the other.
Martin Buber taught us through his philosophy of dialogue an existentialism centered on the direct, mutual relationship, the «I - Thou,» in which each person confirms the other as of unique value.
It was his solidarity with the people in their struggle, his «doing theology», that equipped him for the dialogue with Marxists.
I've been surprised to find many people in the Christian community that are open to dialogue and are not just trying to dictate what others must believe.
In his address, the French cardinal said that the Pope believes «that dialogue between believers, based on love and truth, is the best way to contribute to the harmony, happiness and peace of the peoples of the earth.»
Sure, there is more dialogue than in a typical church, and it sounds more free - flowing, but it is still too «churchy» for most of the people I know here in the Northeast who want nothing to do with «church.»
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z