Sentences with phrase «people in need of legal help»

It all depends on the audience of your blog, but if you create an informational blog targeted at people in need of legal help, then you have a good shot at increasing your client base.

Last month, I wrote about A2J Author, a tool used by legal aid programs and others to create automated guided interviews to assist people in need of legal help.

The new office will be headed by a Civil Justice Coordinator, who will «advise» the mayor on ways to connect people in need of legal help with civil legal services.

Not exact matches

... That analysis and the assertion of those facts is what people need help with, and my lawyers in the governor's counsel's office will serve as counsel for any detainee who needs legal assistance.»

AZBR's mission includes: • Preventing the euthanization of Beagles throughout the state of Arizona • Finding Forever Homes for homeless Beagles • Providing beagles and their companions the opportunity to interact with other beagles and beagle fans • Helping beagle guardians better understand their beagle's temperament and traits • Guiding people who have found a stray beagle in the appropriate and legal step to take • Assisting those who need to find their beagle a new home, when they can no longer keep their beagle • Educating the public on the importance of spay and neuter

The project, funded by the Queens Museum of Art and a nonprofit arts group called Creative Time, also involved opening a storefront in New York where Bruguera wanted to hold arts workshops for immigrants, but found that most of the people who came to the store were interested in learning English or needed help finding employment or legal aid.

JusticeNet.ca is a not - for - profit service helping people in need of legal expertise, whose income is too high to access legal aid and too low to afford standard legal fees.

Lucinda Orr, Chair of the Employed Barristers» Committee said: «Pro bono has a vital role to play in assisting members of the public who can not afford or access the legal advice they often desperately need — the employed bar has many talented lawyers whose skills can now be deployed to help such people, and I am thrilled that the employed bar will now be able to contribute in this critical area.»

I was born and raised in Honduras and I went to college in western New York, then decided to move back from there to Honduras and I wanted to fulfill my Honduran dream of becoming an attorney there and providing some type of solid legal representation to people in need, good clients, serve their needs and so on, and help my country.

At the root of the problem though, is always the same thing: The people in your community who need legal help don't know who you are.

Leveraging technology to provide consumers with legal check - ups, a mobile app, and direct access to attorneys in their geographic area for their specific type of legal need, ARAG's helped more than one million plan members (people like you) gain relief for their legal needs.

A legal coach is for people who plan to do much of the heavy lifting in regards to their case, but may need a little help along the way.

In terms of non-lawyer service providers, the report emphasizes the need for legal information outreach workers and aboriginal community legal workers to help people navigate the justice system.

However, as we move deeper down the iceberg there are layers of people experiencing legal problems and needing help to resolve their problems, but probably not in the courts.

In an interview for a recent Law Times article [1] I expressed the view that one of the main objectives of the legal health check - up (LHC) approach is to establish outreach in order to identify people with unexpressed legal need and to provide pathways along which people can travel to obtain help with legal problemIn an interview for a recent Law Times article [1] I expressed the view that one of the main objectives of the legal health check - up (LHC) approach is to establish outreach in order to identify people with unexpressed legal need and to provide pathways along which people can travel to obtain help with legal problemin order to identify people with unexpressed legal need and to provide pathways along which people can travel to obtain help with legal problems.

Jon is a member of the Los Angeles Trial Lawyers» Charities, an organization, which resonates with dedicated legal professionals for their amazing work helping people in need, in the Los Angeles area.

Andrew addresses the widespread unaffordability of legal services — including for people who would not qualify for legal aid but whose circumstances might turn dire were we to find ourselves in need of legal help.

Anyone who's above that indigency level is not going to be helped by our movement, and there are lots and lots of people in this country of moderate income who can not afford private counsel and still need legal assistance.

People often say 80 % of the legal need goes unmet, and what they're almost always talking about when they say that, is this Legal Services Corporation study that is probably getting a little bit long in the tooth, but was a well done study that shows that about 80 % of the people who qualify for legal aid and have a legal problem that legal aid could help with, nevertheless get turned away, mostly because of a lack of resoPeople often say 80 % of the legal need goes unmet, and what they're almost always talking about when they say that, is this Legal Services Corporation study that is probably getting a little bit long in the tooth, but was a well done study that shows that about 80 % of the people who qualify for legal aid and have a legal problem that legal aid could help with, nevertheless get turned away, mostly because of a lack of resoulegal need goes unmet, and what they're almost always talking about when they say that, is this Legal Services Corporation study that is probably getting a little bit long in the tooth, but was a well done study that shows that about 80 % of the people who qualify for legal aid and have a legal problem that legal aid could help with, nevertheless get turned away, mostly because of a lack of resouLegal Services Corporation study that is probably getting a little bit long in the tooth, but was a well done study that shows that about 80 % of the people who qualify for legal aid and have a legal problem that legal aid could help with, nevertheless get turned away, mostly because of a lack of resopeople who qualify for legal aid and have a legal problem that legal aid could help with, nevertheless get turned away, mostly because of a lack of resoulegal aid and have a legal problem that legal aid could help with, nevertheless get turned away, mostly because of a lack of resoulegal problem that legal aid could help with, nevertheless get turned away, mostly because of a lack of resoulegal aid could help with, nevertheless get turned away, mostly because of a lack of resources.

Then I think there's kind of this parallel track of issues to unpack where there's a distinction between small firms that have built their business model around being able to help solve problems of access, whether that's around unbundling their services or how they do their pricing, or giving away some free do it yourself content on the front end, whether that's also as part of their lead acquisition strategy or just as a service to people who need it, is I think separate from people who then volunteer their time in pro bono efforts, or people who donate their money to legal charitable causes.

80 % below the poverty line and more than 1/2 of those in the middle class — the people who need legal help the most can not get access to even modest legal advice on serious issues like custody, divorce and criminal questions.

Since our founding in 2011, Access Legal Care has helped hundreds of individuals with free phone consultations, affordable in - person legal advice, and legal services that are carefully tailored to individual nLegal Care has helped hundreds of individuals with free phone consultations, affordable in - person legal advice, and legal services that are carefully tailored to individual nlegal advice, and legal services that are carefully tailored to individual nlegal services that are carefully tailored to individual needs.

For now, if we can do that we can serve Canadians better and in the meantime, my hope is that FiredWithoutCause is the first of several ventures to bring law to the people in a cost - effective way and to empower people with legal information so they can get the help they need whether they do it by themselves or engage a lawyer when it is serious.

In compensation, this Discussion Paper very cleverly sets a scene of urgency and tragic drama by citing the high percentages of people needing legal advice services, some of whom are going to court without lawyers, even though its ABS proposal can't do anything to help them.

In some cases, for example, helping one client at a time makes a difference for that person but it doesn't really alter the system, or only representing the poorest of the poor, not to say somebody is higher or lower priority, but if you think about your landlord clients, for example, they're not the poorest of the poor but they've crawled out of legal aid eligibility only to be told, «Now here's a giant expense that you need to undertake to move to the next level.»

The survey results suggest people in need of help could in the future fail to find a legal adviser.

From the start, he dedicated his law practice to helping people in urgent need of legal representation — the victims of personal injury accidents.

The Social Worker position is part of a CLSMF initiative functioning in an outreach / support capacity designed to provide integrative links to services for adult clients with MH or other qualifying disabilities The CLSMF Social Worker is responsible for supporting clients» basic needs by fielding referrals to / from the legal staff as part of a person centered, holistic approach to helping a diverse, at - risk client population in the Volusia County service area.

We help people successfully resolve important personal matters that have become legal issues in need of legal solutions.

What had motivated the creators, was the observation that most advice from lawyers on legal rights of the victims of a crime felt like it was written mainly for the use of other lawyers, rather than to help inform the general public, who were in fact the people most in need of the information.

You have the right to find out about the legal options to which you may be entitled if you or someone you love has been injured by a product or through the negligence of others in the state of North Dakota, At Sokolove Law, we are a national law firm, and we've helped people across the U.S., including North Dakota, access the legal assistance they need.

We receive less than half our needed funding from government sources and thus rely on YOU donating money in support of the work to help hundreds of low - income neighbors in Kitsap County get the basic civil legal help they need to protect children, families, the elderly, veterans, and people with disabilities.

Most family lawyers that I know here in Edmonton are already participating in some form of voluntarism (public family law seminars, summary legal advice clinics, taking pro bono files, subsiding Court projects for self - represented people needing help on child support etc etc) It goes on an on.

For example, if one's career goal is to do divorce work for the rich and famous, try starting at Legal Aid — learn the principles of divorce law, meet the judges, and help people in need.

Many of them lost the papers that they needed, the insurance papers, and deeds to claim flood benefits and legal aid in West Virginia had to help hundreds and hundreds of people.

During this experience Bull noted that most advice from lawyers on legal rights and the victims of crime came in documents that felt like they were written mainly for the use of other lawyers, rather than to help inform the general public, who were in fact the people most in need of this information.

And rightly so, given that legal help plays such a critical role in leveling the playing field for the most vulnerable in our community yet continues to be out of reach for most people who need it.

The LSC participated in the inaugural training programme and its enlarged role in the forthcoming round of fellows has the enthusiastic backing of President Jim Sandman: «This collaboration places smart, creative, and entrepreneurial law students with legal aid programs that are developing new technologies to serve low - income people... It also exposes the law student fellows to the needs of people who can not afford to pay for legal assistance and will help cultivate a new generation of access - to - justice advocates.»

NJP also maintains WashingtonLawHelp, a public website containing an extensive library of legal resources, self - help materials, including necessary court forms in areas of law needed most by low income persons, the great majority of whom are forced to appear in court unrepresented.

And I also think as a legal industry unlike other industries where Artificial Intelligence is more of a threat, you look at transportation and I think there's going to be some real questions there as to what AI and its effects are, but in law, you have the majority of people, who need a lawyer not being able to afford it, and so I think there's this huge leading market and I actually think AI could end up allowing lawyers to do more work being more profitable as a law firm, and I think most importantly, helping further access to justice in that process.

In this Prawfs post a few months ago, I speculated that green (i.e., young / junior) lawyers may have a uniquely important role to play in the emerging marijuana «green rush» industry: not only may veteran lawyers be cautious and concerned about representing persons actively involved in state marijuana business, but marijuana reform often seems a «young man's game» for which junior lawyers may be uniquely positioned to be of service to persons needing legal help in this arenIn this Prawfs post a few months ago, I speculated that green (i.e., young / junior) lawyers may have a uniquely important role to play in the emerging marijuana «green rush» industry: not only may veteran lawyers be cautious and concerned about representing persons actively involved in state marijuana business, but marijuana reform often seems a «young man's game» for which junior lawyers may be uniquely positioned to be of service to persons needing legal help in this arenin the emerging marijuana «green rush» industry: not only may veteran lawyers be cautious and concerned about representing persons actively involved in state marijuana business, but marijuana reform often seems a «young man's game» for which junior lawyers may be uniquely positioned to be of service to persons needing legal help in this arenin state marijuana business, but marijuana reform often seems a «young man's game» for which junior lawyers may be uniquely positioned to be of service to persons needing legal help in this arenin this arena.

While Legal Tech has been more commonly associated with the application of technology and software to help law firms with practice management, document storage, billing, accounting, and electronic discovery, in the last few years it has blossomed more into a means whereby access can be granted to people through online software that might reduce or even eliminate the need to consult a lawyer.

Perhaps most intriguing is the value that the alt.legal contributions have to helping people in need of free legal assistance.

Connected with the right people: being an established firm in Northampton we have strong relationships with other professionals including financiers, bankers, accountants, surveyors and agents which means that we can connect quickly with the right people at the right level of experience to develop the best deals and agreements needed to help businesses flourish, whether that is real estate deals, commercial contracts, corporate deals, intellectual property rights, trade marks, disputes or personal legal matters.

As Willis explained, spreading the reach of legal help can forgo future disasters for people in need.

Attorney Murphy is also a compassionate legal advocate who has successfully represented people from all walks of life and has volunteered his time when not practicing law helping to serve those in need in soup kitchens and by providing pro bono legal services.

Both solutions will occur because the power of the news media and of the internet, interacting, will quickly make widely known these types of information, the cumulative effect of which will force governments and the courts to act: (1) the situations of the thousands of people whose lives have been ruined because they could not obtain the help of a lawyer; (2) the statistics as to the increasing percentages of litigants who are unrepresented and clogging the courts, causing judges to provide more public warnings; (3) the large fees that some lawyers charge; (4) increasing numbers of people being denied Legal Aid and court - appointed lawyers; (5) the many years that law societies have been unsuccessful in coping with this problem which continues to grow worse; (6) people prosecuted for «the unauthorized practice of law» because they tried to help others desperately in need of a lawyer whom they couldn't afford to hire; (7) that there is no truly effective advertising creating competition among law firms that could cause them to lower their fees; (8) that law societies are too comfortably protected by their monopoly over the provision of legal services, which is why they might block the expansion of the paralegal profession, and haven't effectively innovated with electronic technology and new infrastructure so as to be able to solve this problem; (9) that when members of the public access the law society website they don't see any reference to the problem that can assure them that something effective is being done and, (10) in order for the rule of law, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the whole of Canada's constitution be able to operate effectively and command sufficient respect, the majority of the population must be able to obtain a lawyer at reasonable Legal Aid and court - appointed lawyers; (5) the many years that law societies have been unsuccessful in coping with this problem which continues to grow worse; (6) people prosecuted for «the unauthorized practice of law» because they tried to help others desperately in need of a lawyer whom they couldn't afford to hire; (7) that there is no truly effective advertising creating competition among law firms that could cause them to lower their fees; (8) that law societies are too comfortably protected by their monopoly over the provision of legal services, which is why they might block the expansion of the paralegal profession, and haven't effectively innovated with electronic technology and new infrastructure so as to be able to solve this problem; (9) that when members of the public access the law society website they don't see any reference to the problem that can assure them that something effective is being done and, (10) in order for the rule of law, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the whole of Canada's constitution be able to operate effectively and command sufficient respect, the majority of the population must be able to obtain a lawyer at reasonable legal services, which is why they might block the expansion of the paralegal profession, and haven't effectively innovated with electronic technology and new infrastructure so as to be able to solve this problem; (9) that when members of the public access the law society website they don't see any reference to the problem that can assure them that something effective is being done and, (10) in order for the rule of law, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the whole of Canada's constitution be able to operate effectively and command sufficient respect, the majority of the population must be able to obtain a lawyer at reasonable cost.

; (4) taxpayers would not have to pay for a justice system that provides lawyers a good place to earn a living but doesn't provide affordable legal services for those taxpayers; (5) the problem wouldn't be causing more damage in one day than all of the incompetent and unethical lawyers have caused in the whole of Canada's history (6) the legal profession would be expanding instead of contracting; because, (7) if legal services were affordable, lawyers would have more work than they could handle because people have never needed lawyers more; (8) law schools would be expanding their enrolments instead of being urged to contract them; (9) the problem would not be causing serious & increasing damage to the population, the courts, the legal profession, and to legal aid organizations because their funding varies inversely with the cost of legal services for taxpayers who finance legal aid's free legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&rlegal services for those taxpayers; (5) the problem wouldn't be causing more damage in one day than all of the incompetent and unethical lawyers have caused in the whole of Canada's history (6) the legal profession would be expanding instead of contracting; because, (7) if legal services were affordable, lawyers would have more work than they could handle because people have never needed lawyers more; (8) law schools would be expanding their enrolments instead of being urged to contract them; (9) the problem would not be causing serious & increasing damage to the population, the courts, the legal profession, and to legal aid organizations because their funding varies inversely with the cost of legal services for taxpayers who finance legal aid's free legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&rlegal profession would be expanding instead of contracting; because, (7) if legal services were affordable, lawyers would have more work than they could handle because people have never needed lawyers more; (8) law schools would be expanding their enrolments instead of being urged to contract them; (9) the problem would not be causing serious & increasing damage to the population, the courts, the legal profession, and to legal aid organizations because their funding varies inversely with the cost of legal services for taxpayers who finance legal aid's free legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&rlegal services were affordable, lawyers would have more work than they could handle because people have never needed lawyers more; (8) law schools would be expanding their enrolments instead of being urged to contract them; (9) the problem would not be causing serious & increasing damage to the population, the courts, the legal profession, and to legal aid organizations because their funding varies inversely with the cost of legal services for taxpayers who finance legal aid's free legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&rlegal profession, and to legal aid organizations because their funding varies inversely with the cost of legal services for taxpayers who finance legal aid's free legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&rlegal aid organizations because their funding varies inversely with the cost of legal services for taxpayers who finance legal aid's free legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&rlegal services for taxpayers who finance legal aid's free legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&rlegal aid's free legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&rlegal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&rLegal Bill - To High?»

The latest legal needs survey in the Netherlands (Geschilbeslechtingsdelta 2014) suggests that 48 per cent of people seeking assistance in the legal sector want advice about how to solve problems; 45 per cent advice about their rights and obligations; 24 per cent help with approaching the other party; 20 per cent mediation; 18 per cent some kind of financial advice; and 16 per cent help with starting a procedure.

Moreover, because marijuana reform movements seem often to be a «young man's game» in many ways, junior lawyers may be uniquely positioned to be of service to persons needing legal help in this arena.