Sentences with phrase «people in other articles»

I was about to reply — that I seen some that must of got past admin because I could of sworn I heard him mouthing / insulting off at people in other articles.
Many people in the other article about buying gold state they did so to pay for repair costs, which are probably the number one money sink in endgame WoW.

Not exact matches

When asked to select the articles they'd share, activity in the brain regions associated with assessing value, self - related thinking, and, crucially, considering other people's perspective showed a flurry of activity.
And, in addition to the Times «article on Wednesday, several more women came forward with similar accusations against Trump this week in other publications, including People and The Guardian.
For example, one person (who, like the others I spoke with, preferred not to share his name for this article) told me he offered to help protesters get out their message in English by providing translation services.
According to a 2010 Time Magazine article, «Research shows that simple exposure to other kinds of people in a friendly setting can increase your empathy toward them.»
In the future, people will look back at this article and the others like it, and you will look like someone who didn't have any insight, couldn't see the big picture, glossed over and ignored the facts and who missed it completely.
The good people of HowMuch.net, a cost comparison website, also make other observations in their article associated with the video here.
In this article, I will mention reasons why people prefer to invest in municipal bonds to other types of bonds and also how to buy municipal bondIn this article, I will mention reasons why people prefer to invest in municipal bonds to other types of bonds and also how to buy municipal bondin municipal bonds to other types of bonds and also how to buy municipal bonds.
Have you considered teh fact that your answer only applies to people who believe in Christianity, and ignores all the other religions in this nation (and basically perfectly illustrates the point the article is making).
The Christian Right wants public money to be used for private religious education (vouchers), buildings and services to be used for private religious purposes (this article), and they want subsidies in the form of tax breaks, special exemptions of other sorts, and they even want to destroy Aid to Needy Families so they can drive people into seeking help at their private religious «missions» where you are not allowed to eat unless you are a Christian, and so on.
Is it so wrong of me to have faith that only one person believes in the drivel that he's posting rather than think that another person a) actually thinks that chad is making good points and good enough points to post and b) go to the 62nd page of an almost defunct article for a conversation that has nothing to do with themselves other than to cheer on a stupid post?
In other words, its a fancy bit of marketing that does its job well: it provokes people to read the article.
This «pastor» in this article is no better than Hitler or any other world leader who wants to kill people for no reason.
but fortunately there are psychologists, mental health practitioners and others who do and I have benefitted greatly from their work, personal testimonies and the various articles / publications which they have produced --(for example, The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology; The Religious & Spiritual Problems category in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM - IV) published by the American Psychiatric Association; The US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health PubMed.gov database of healthcare and scientific literature)-- about the adverse psychological effects which can arise when persons engage in intense / deep spiritual practices such as intense / deep prayer, fasting and meditation which alter their state of consciousness.
Writing an article damning other people in their faith when your is not to supposed to judge is being hypocritical.
There are other things in this article that disturb me, and again while I am grateful that funding and aid is going, allegedly to these people, my concern is that it, and I have asserted this before in other postings....
Thus, as I have previously stated, this entire article exists for the sole purpose of trying to make people think one way or the other about this man without bothering to think about the issues which he DID speak of in his life, which IS ad hominem.
This article is excerpted from the volume she edited, Practicing Our Faith: A Way of Life for a Searching People, which includes chapters on 11 other «practices of faith,» published in January, 1997 by Jossey - Bass.
It saddens me that in this well - researched and well - written article about PEOPLE, the only thing you and many others can harp on is Islam.
Now I come close to the theme of this article: one writer, and I have found no other, in the early Middle Ages attacked classical theism head - on precisely on its two most vulnerable points — its affirmation of, or failure definitely to reject, unqualified theological determinism, and its commitment to endless posthumous careers for human persons, making them in that respect rivals to God.
In the article «Treasury Wine class action fires up» (AFR, July 3), it is reported that Brian Jones bought 1000 shares in 2012 at an average price of $ 4.76 and claims that he is bringing this action on his and other persons» behalIn the article «Treasury Wine class action fires up» (AFR, July 3), it is reported that Brian Jones bought 1000 shares in 2012 at an average price of $ 4.76 and claims that he is bringing this action on his and other persons» behalin 2012 at an average price of $ 4.76 and claims that he is bringing this action on his and other persons» behalf.
For now, you can shot your TVs or cry every or other week end... Not sit here picking teams and players to go or stay; we have really nothing, pathetic to be point where article like this have people actually debating on who go or in... What difference that make, an average player replaced by another... Better off promote youngsters.
Reading the thread on this article and I noticed a lot of people naming strikers we could have gotten in past transfer windows that have gone to other club and failed, Balotelli, Falcao, Martinez, Boney etc are recurring names in all the comments, and am sat here thinking because they failed in thee clubs does not necessarily mean they would have failed if we had pulled out our fingers and hot them back then, Balotelli aside I strongly believe all of these players could have made a difference playing infront of our midfield and given the kind of attention and care Wenger gives Giroud and Walcott, adapting our play to suit them and giving them chances after chances even when its blatantly obvious they are average players so please lets not keep using that as an excuse for Wenger's ultra careful attitude in the transfer market, they could have failed with us, or they could have been massive for us, all speculations.
General question: How are the ways some players, managers, plays, careers, futures and other portions of Tiger baseball being questioned or denigrated on occasion, through articles and comments on this blog, in line with only quietly say nice things about people when they make a mistake?
I see some people here criticizing the home fans for not being loud enough in other articles, what did u want them to do, they pay season ticket to watch crap all season, if another 10 mins was given we would have lost that game and u expect the fans to become robots.
I hate articles that rejoice in other people's injuries I wish Aguero, Silva and Schweinsteiger a quick return.
i don't see any sense in the article apart from promoting england players by the way people on here praise the ox but none realises that his final product ends in the hands of the defenders after exciting us with he runs in to defenders, i don't mean to say he's bad but i'd prefer him in the middle because there he makes runs and shoot on sight other than in the wings where he hardly create a thing... put campbell, Sanchez and walcot in the wings.
We are sorry if we seem ungrateful sometimes Admin, you are really doing a GREAT job making me especially happy and i don't know about any other person cause i might not comment very often but i visit this site every single day of my life to read comments from everyone and it really makes my day... So thank you very much and nevertheless, i personally am tired of reading articles of Alexis Sanchez now... I must admit i personally thought Sanchez was holding Arsenal to ransom before, until Wenger came out to say he has never asked for a transfer request and i think the club has made there intentions known that they don't want to sell him, not even to a title rival and i think that is why city are now going after mbappe, seems they are desperately in need of a striker and if they are that desperate they should fork out 80m for Sanchez if they really need him, I LIKE THE RISK ARSENAL IS TAKING AS REGARDS SANCHEZ..
I might not be a writer myself but I feel the content in the articles are «usually pretty good» (some writers ofcourse) but the titles just blows people off and others rush into comments reacting directly to the title rather than the issues raised.
I do hope this and the other articles that you have done in the past are illustrating this point to people throughout the country.
As one Huffington post article on the subject explained, people who are psychopaths often don't yawn when others do (one of those weird but true social behaviors), stay super calm in dangerous situations, and thrive on drama (without even showing it).
In the real world, however, parents who are sleep training are often left to figure it out on their own, with only warring internet articles and other people's advice as their guides.
Yay, I just read an article on babies in the workplace in People or some other such magazine.
The article provides with a very deep analysis about how person's worldview affects their approach on other, «smaller» things in their life.
The linked article makes pretty clear that someone tried to bring food to people in a military installation whose supplies were cut off by others.
It sits within a framework of other rights (especially Article 5, the liberty and security of the person) that are sometimes in necessary tension.
Finally, if 1/20/09 comes and goes with a usurper in the Whitehouse (that is, Obama is definitely NOT an Article II «natural born citizen» — dad Kenyan / British citizen at BHO's birth — albeit he MAY be a 14th Amendment «citizen») with usurper enablers in Congress and the Supreme Court... God help us because many of the people will — rightfully and under our Constitution and Declaration of Independence — endeavor through other means to take back the Government from what is nothing less than a non-constitutional coup d'etat.
In the House of Commons on 23rd February, Cameron said that, «If the British people vote to leave, there is only one way to bring that about, namely to trigger Article 50 of the treaties and begin the process of exit...» He could have chosen from hundreds of other words in this context - «apply», «appeal» or «administer» for instance (just to pick words beginning with the letter «a»)-- but, no, he decided to go with triggeIn the House of Commons on 23rd February, Cameron said that, «If the British people vote to leave, there is only one way to bring that about, namely to trigger Article 50 of the treaties and begin the process of exit...» He could have chosen from hundreds of other words in this context - «apply», «appeal» or «administer» for instance (just to pick words beginning with the letter «a»)-- but, no, he decided to go with triggein this context - «apply», «appeal» or «administer» for instance (just to pick words beginning with the letter «a»)-- but, no, he decided to go with trigger.
In June 1971 the editors of Oz magazine went on trial at the Old Bailey for, among other things, conspiring to «corrupt the morals of young children and other young persons» by producing an «obscene article».
«Article 3 (3) of the Constitution, 1992 makes it the offence of high treason for any person to suspend, overthrow or abrogate the constitution by violent or other unlawful means, or to aid and abet any other person in such acts.
Subject to the provisions of this article, a political party is free to participate in shaping the political will of the people, to disseminate information on political ideas, social and economic programmes of a national character, and sponsor candidates for elections to any public office other than to District Assemblies or lower local government units.
It was proved that the officer had the right to use deadly force when Brown was charging at him, yet people still use it as an example of unjustified police violence; for example in this article (but there are others as well).
«Article III, § 5 of the State Constitution, reads, in part, «An apportionment by the legislature, or other body, (emphasis added) shall be subject to review by the supreme court... (Amended by vote of the people November 6, 1945.)»
It was hilarious because, in the very same article, the Post mentioned all the other folks, vulture hedge funders, NYC real estate vampires and the pro-charter school people were spending enormous amounts of cash to better steal all our democracies.
Backing his claim with Article 13 of the Constitution which says «no person shall be deprived of his life intentionally except in the exercise of the execution of a sentence of a court in respect of a criminal offence under the laws of Ghana of which he has been convicted,» the caucus leader and Minister for Parliamentary Affairs said, «I do not think that the constitution, in so far as a matter is criminal, frowns upon the use of force to the extent that it may even deprive some other people of their lives.
Labour's David Miliband claims, in a recent Spectator article, that there is a contradiction between David Cameron's emphasis on people «turning to each other» rather than to the state, and the Conservative leader's call for state intervention on the environment.
4.2.8 Supply single copies of articles (either digital or paper copies), from the Licensed Materials, to health professionals or other persons legitimately requesting medical information in relation to the medical, therapeutic or technical use and support of any of the Licensee's products under the following conditions only: (a) Such copies must be free - standing with no additional material affixed to or printed on them; (b) The copies must carry, without modification, those copyright notices already incorporated in the Licensed Materials; (c) Recipients must be instructed not to further distribute the copies; (d) This use of Licensed Materials is restricted to responding to enquiries (reactive use).
Recall from the first article that offering value is about helping the other person in any way you can.
People who read the article describing the government as potentially unstable were more likely to agree that God, or some other type of nonhuman entity, is in control of the universe.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z