Not exact matches
Influencer Alissa Ashley, who has nearly a million subscribers, said she was frustrated by the shades or (lack thereof) in her own video review, saying that they appeared «orange» on her skin even after mixing two different shades, opting out of an extended wear test out of
principle, and telling Tarte, «The fact that there is such a limited shade range for
people of color,
people with melanin, is just so disappointing and honestly, I'm shocked that Tarte would do this given the fact they
knew that
people were so excited for this.»
I
know my earlier book
Principled Profit: Marketing That Puts
People First has changed lives, and this book not only expands and amplifies those powerful concepts under a specifically eco-friendly lens, its also going to reach a lot more people because it has the support and power not only of my personal network, but also the resources of both a big NYC publisher (John Wiley & Sons) and my superstar co-author, Mr. Guerrilla Marketing himself, Jay Conrad Levinson — the man who brought us not only all the Guerrilla Marketing books but also Uniteds Friendly Skies, Allstates Good Hands, and even the Marlbor
People First has changed lives, and this book not only expands and amplifies those powerful concepts under a specifically eco-friendly lens, its also going to reach a lot more
people because it has the support and power not only of my personal network, but also the resources of both a big NYC publisher (John Wiley & Sons) and my superstar co-author, Mr. Guerrilla Marketing himself, Jay Conrad Levinson — the man who brought us not only all the Guerrilla Marketing books but also Uniteds Friendly Skies, Allstates Good Hands, and even the Marlbor
people because it has the support and power not only of my personal network, but also the resources of both a big NYC publisher (John Wiley & Sons) and my superstar co-author, Mr. Guerrilla Marketing himself, Jay Conrad Levinson — the man who brought us not only all the Guerrilla Marketing books but also Uniteds Friendly Skies, Allstates Good Hands, and even the Marlboro Man.
I personally
know several
people who still have interest - only mortgages and had been enjoying negligible payments for years now, but have no idea how to pay back the
principle on their liar - loans and more terrifyingly for them little understanding of what their monthly payments could escalate to with inflation at say 4 % in a couple of years time.
On the same point, I
know many, many
people of faith who do not «force» their views on others, yet instead use their faith as their guiding
principle to share love, kindness, and goodness to others.
I am a well educated
person, and happen to
know that the
principles of biochemistry totally militate against even a simple cell arising by blind chance.
I don't
know what sorts of «punishment» God might have in store for
people after death, but again, using Jesus as the guiding
principle, I highly doubt that God is going to torture
people for all eternity by burning them in fire.
In each of these cases,
people who should
know better prioritize short - term comfort over the health, mission, and
principles of their institutions.
One of the greatest intellectual crises of our age, one with enormous practical implications, is the fact that most
people simply do not believe that there are any universal
principles of right and wrong, or, if there are such
principles, that we can
know them sufficiently to demand adherence to them.
Aristotle wrote that the criterion of good moral action is not a
principle or a law so much as «the man of practical wisdom» ¯ that is, the
person in your environment who habitually makes the wisest and bravest decisions of anyone else you
know.
The complex of ordered energy that is the human body centred on the brain must itself be integrated through its own individual
principle of transcendental control and direction - the centred
knowing and loving as
person which we call our «soul».
Because of this, at least, the physician is also a moral
person, the subject of an ethical imperative addressed to him,
no matter to what he attributes this absolute
principle.
On the other hand such personalism iuris divini, which despite its importance can not here be proved theologically, is a
principle of resistance against the well -
known dangers and shortcomings of democracy in large societies where self - government by the
people, for example, by plebiscite is
no longer possible and the representation which takes its place be - comes more and moe autonomous.
Or suppose the Christological question had been primarily a question about the community: «What is the reality in which these
persons who
knew Jesus and now remember Him participate, and which constitutes the essential
principle of the community's existence?»
As for secular scientists, Stark surmises that they «now take as a given and very frequently don't
know the origin of the kinds of
principles that
people like Newton and Copernicus and others took from Christian theology.
No, i just think there would be
no principle of ethics or treating
people with dignity if not for religion.
People still
know (or think they
know) that Bachmann is
principled and....
But it is a capital error if such protesters argue, as often happens, according to the
principle that I can personally do as I like, hence I should also let others do as they like, for if the other
person does what he likes I can
no longer do the same and act from the same situation which would obtain if the other had not acted.
A state that was «truly founded upon the
principles of atheism would be the greatest place on earth; a place of reason, compassion, logic, knowledge and beauty, where each fellow
knew his and her fellows as
people to be cherished, not chastised and shackled into conformity through propaganda and war crimes.»
You
know, the guys in fiction (and in life) who can kick your tail seven ways but more violent - minded
people wouldn't
know it because these guys would rather let someone beat them up than to throw a punch and betray their
principles.
For it is necessary that the faith of the Church, as this has been articulated during the two thousand years of Christian history in the form of theological statements, should be made
known to the
people; it is equally necessary that the developed
principles of Christian life, in respect to devotional practice and in terms of daily conduct, should be taught.
By
principle we mean the whole concern that governs the communication: when the monological
principle is employed, one
person tells another what he ought to
know, and the communication is content - centered; when the dialogical
principle governs a communication, the speaker feels responsible for and responds to the patterns of experience and understanding that his listener brings to the situation, and thus the listener is encouraged to grapple with his own meaning in relation to the speaker's meaning.
As being a consequence of this
principle, much more men and women pick to share their strategies and
know - how to other many
people via coaching.
I
know so many mormons and they are such nice
people with generally good
principles and are often really, really intelligent.
Your government was formed on the
principles that government should do what its
people dictate... but then evangelists aren't
known to be entirely truthful.
Luther did not at first contradict indulgences in
principle: He
knew the value of simple explanations for the
people.
His treatises include works on Marriage, on Confirmation, and on the Holy Communion, and his ethical and devotional writings take up the
principles of spiritual guidance as a pastor might want to
know them in dealing with others, as well as assisting priest or
people in their own inner life.
And then we get to the best part, which is Barnhart's guiding
principle that «nobody
knows the game better than the
people who played it and coached it.»
Whilst these blogs are popular - in terms of unique visitor numbers (and before Unity has a go at me, I
know there are weaknesses in those numbers)- they tend to be written by
people who write about a large number of issues and climate change is not their
principle topic (or even one that they discuss very often).
Liberals
knew there were
people out there who resented things like immigration, equal marriage and «progressive»
principles in general — they didn't take seriously the possibility that those
people might actually take over.
«There is no difference in
principle between STV and party lists; they both presuppose that voting is essentially not for a
person, but for a party» I don't
know what voting system you're talking about, but it definitely isn't STV, which is all about voting for individuals, strengthens the chances of Independents, weakens the party structure, etc..
And it is an act of class war to assault the social architecture — the welfare state, the NHS, the
principle of equality on education, accessible justice, decent housing — that our forebears fought for, built and that we, the
people of this country, have paid for through our taxes and have kept dear for generations because we
know that these are what underpin a fairer, better Britain.
Specifically, any unsolicited actions of others that physically affect an individual's property or
person,
no matter if the result of those actions is damaging, beneficial, or neutral to the owner, are considered violent or aggressive when they are against the owner's free will and interfere with his right to self - determination and the
principle of self - ownership.
«Radical change is now required to shape up the policy of organisation and delivery alongside a clear set of policies and
principles so
people know what we stand for,» he argued.
His political opponents and even hawks on the other side felt comfortable dealing with him to the extent that
people perceived as architects of Npp diabolic operations including
known Npp inclined journalists saw him as a brother, a friend and others a comrade.One may ask, what went into that magic moves.In opposition he was one character whose communication skills helped shape the philosophy of the party.The boldness he exhibited in the media and his
principled approach to issues reshape the philosophy of the party.
He said: «I
knew that by taking that decision all sorts of
people would attack me personally but I love my country, I could not recommend that Boris was prime minister, I had tried to make that work and, therefore, it would have been a genuine betrayal of
principle and of this country to have allowed Boris's candidacy to go ahead with my support.»
«I
know that there are a small handful, but it's not the numbers, it's the
principle — about six
people and those six are having their cases aggressively argued vis - a-vis the federal government,» Cuomo said.
People who
know me closely, including my teachers and lecturers,
know that I have throughout my life stood for the
principles I believe in and in my own conscience and it is strange that Ayine, whose family has benefitted from my upright character, insults me because the President has set him against me.
A brand new science for studying this networked phenomenon, and in effect it's kind of a reverse engineering the World Wide Web that we
know and the kinds of networks that we see on that to try to figure out how they took shape and maybe from that we can learn what
principles involve and how networks do grow and you might be able to use that sort of thing to be able to develop a better system s for example being able to create more efficient networks and that could be very valuable in industry, there may be a lot of practical applications, involving protecting privacy, for example, and stopping
people from stealing identities; and you should, you
know, should be of just an interesting phenomenon.
By this thinking, if we
knew the properties of every particle on the planet we could, in
principle, calculate any
person's fate; we could even calculate all the thoughts in his or her head.
Another issue is that most
people don't take the time to even understand the most basic
principles of nutrition.They don't
know how much protein, carbohydrates and fats they should eat a day.
The kind of yoga made use of in the trial,
known as viniyoga, adjusts the
principles of yoga for each
person as well as physical condition, with adjustments for
people with physical limits.
Now the study wasn't very big but not the
principle that
people forget is that you
know, if you cut your forearm, you're gonna wan na wipe it off and put in uh you
know, Band - Aid on to prevent pathogen entry.
The
principles that fixed my problems are the same
principles that fix almost all health problems but most
people still don't
know this information and so they're suffering needlessly.
If you
know all three and use them in your fight, then you will have the best possible chance of recovery and lasting health (incidentally, very few
people ever explain what is probably the most important of these three
principles).
And just like music, most
people don't
know what these
principles are.
And while the Nordic diet makes sense for those living in Northern Europe,
people everywhere can apply those same
principles to their diet
no matter where they live.
It's essentially the
principle that
no matter how good a
person is at something, given enough will and effort, there's still ostensibly room for them to get even better.
Not only do professors not
know how to teach well in
person, but also their lack of understanding of the basic
principles of sound learning design causes them to exacerbate these problems as they put these experiences online.
And that, of course, is a fundamental
principle of equity, that you don't evaluate
people on something they don't
know.
Of course, whilst these
principles outline what excellent teachers
know, do and how they act, it is important to place them firmly in the context of improving outcomes for children and young
people.