Sentences with phrase «people leave money on the table»

Which is why so many people leave money on the table by not comparing rates, terms, and benefits when shopping for a card.

«It's like giving yourself a raise,» said Jody Dietel, spokesperson for Save Smart Spend Healthy and chief compliance officer at FSA administrator WageWorks Inc. «People leave money on the table if they're not willing to put the time into it.»

Not exact matches

Deciding not to deal with certain people is like leaving money on the table.

There are more people browsing for products on their mobile devices than ever before, and not using a quick and simple checkout solution could mean leaving a lot of money on the table.

«People didn't understand why I would leave a senior role and money on the table,» she says.

Even if he leaves some money on the table, Koum has still amassed a $ 10.4 billion fortune, having sold $ 8 billion of Facebook stock since 2015, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, a ranking of the world's 500 richest people.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

But new research suggests that people's racial biases make them more likely to leave money on the table when a windfall is not split evenly between groups.

Indeed, it appears that eHarmony excludes certain people from their dating pool, leaving money on the table in the process, presumably because the algorithm concludes that such individuals are poor relationship material.

Subaru already makes exceptionally well - engineered cars, and - yes - their sales are up, but they are leaving vast amounts of money on the table because their product lineup doesn't connect emotionally, the key component to driving people into showrooms.

If all you're do is inviting people to connect on LinkedIn, and accepting their invitations, you're leaving money on the table.

Too many people don't take advantage of these things, and even though they are part of your «total compensation», that money is left on the table.

Most people don't realize the money they are leaving on the table by leaving savings at local banks.

«If you can price a home at market value, you will sell just as quickly,» he contends, pointing out that if only one person bids on an underpriced home, you could be leaving money on the table.

The third is silent, and leaves a lot of money on the table — most people would be better off taking an annuity from their pension plan than a third party, or trying to manage a lump sum on their own.

At the same time, our mortality virtually guarantees that most people will leave some money on the table when they die.

Even so, the average person commonly expresses the belief that when they have a profit going they should take the money and run - often leaving a lot of money on the table when they do.

Far too many firms view the goal of compensation - setting as simply «making as many people as happy as possible», which a) often leads to poorer performers being overly - compensated at the expense of the generous, strong performers who «leave money on the table» for the good of the firm, and b) ignores a golden opportunity to set performance goals and expectations for the firm and for each lawyer and staff member (one of which can be a defined role on a team) and then make the performance against such pie - growing efforts a factor in compensation.

Most often management thinks that differences between partners can be addressed by money but in fact very successful people in my experience want to be around others of that ilk and in fact always leave money on the table for that.

Under Chisum's funding scheme, the People's Community Clinic would fall into the second tier of organizations eligible for funding — but with just $ 9 million left on the table according to the House budget, it isn't clear that there would be any money available for any of these providers.

«What people often miss is the next level of customization and they're leaving money on the table,» says Fisher.

«However, the preferences for cash and real estate indicate that too many people are leaving money on the virtual table by failing to be sufficiently exposed to the stock market, where higher long - term returns are found.

In my experience I've seen more people successful hold out than leave money on the table so these arguments in my opinion are a net wash.

For a lot of people, negotiation raises a great deal of anxiety, and it's common to leave money on the table.