«Second we need to unite our country and third we need a strong, new positive vision for the future of our country - a vision of a country that works not for the privileged few but works for every one of us, because we're going to give
people more control over their lives and that's how together we will build a better Britain.»
«A vision of a country that works not for the privileged few but that works for every one of us because we're going to give
people more control over their lives and that's how, together, we will build a better Britain.»
The government wants the apprenticeship scheme to help millions get the skills they need for a successful career and believes apprenticeships gives
people more control over their lives.
Apprenticeships give
people more control over their lives and can be the difference between just about managing and pursuing a skilled, long - term career.
Not exact matches
«Creating a working environment where
people have greater
control over their work -
life balance is a personal and commercial imperative; it results in
more fulfilled
people, higher performing teams, better results for our clients and we recruit and retain the best talent.»
According to the Fast Company article, «Study Finds Work -
Life Balance Could Be a Matter of Life and Death,» researchers from Indiana University's Kelley School of Business found that people who work in highly stressful jobs with little to no control over their work life were 15.4 % more likely to die soo
Life Balance Could Be a Matter of
Life and Death,» researchers from Indiana University's Kelley School of Business found that people who work in highly stressful jobs with little to no control over their work life were 15.4 % more likely to die soo
Life and Death,» researchers from Indiana University's Kelley School of Business found that
people who work in highly stressful jobs with little to no
control over their work
life were 15.4 % more likely to die soo
life were 15.4 %
more likely to die sooner.
Our mission is to give
people who have overcome challenges the ability to assert
more control over their
lives and build a legacy they can be proud of.
I believe in smaller government, less
control over the
people, but we need to help our brothers and sisters with handouts but mostly a hand up to a better,
more fulfilling
life where they can do things for themselves and their families.
I believe that
people, poor as they were by our standards, had
more control over their own
lives in those days than is possible today for most workers, especially in the developing countries.
Initially, the
people were skeptical, but
over time,
more and
more people believed, until eventually, the whole town was convinced that this man and his book were from God and had the right to rule and
control every element of their
lives.
It is a mighty god and, like
more ancient ones, gives
people a measure of
control over their
lives.
If your heart can't take another pregnancy announcement, take
more control over the
people you allow in your
life.
It is worth noting that while
people under age 65 in the U.S.
live in a heavily market - dominated economy where poor employment outcomes mean poverty and a lack of access to health care, almost everyone
over age 65 has most of their healthcare paid for by Medicare, (a FICA tax financed, single payer system that pays providers
more or less the same rates as private insurance companies and has few cost
controls),
more than half of their nursing home costs paid by Medicaid, (which is stingy in how much it pays providers and moderately means tested), and receives enough of a guaranteed income from the combination of Social Security and SSI payments to keep the poverty rate for
people age 65 +, (even if they have no retirement savings of their own), above the poverty line, regardless of the state of the local economy.
«All ideas of making
people feel they have
more power and
control over government and their
lives and the criminal justice system, those are all things we can look at,» he said.
«In this century of opportunity, of the information revolution, where
people have and want
more power and
control over their
lives, progressive ends will best be met through conservative means,» he told the party faithful.
Speaking just 11 days before he is expected to go to Buckingham Palace to call the election, Brown says he will offer the nation «
more fairness,
more responsibility from vested interests, a greater sense that
people have
more control over their
lives.
«We are
living in a society where sometimes we allow our emotions to take
control over situations, to the extent that sometimes accused
persons get compassion from the public
more than the victims of the offence, probably due to our alien legal system.
It's the first step to gaining
control over your personal and professional
life and becoming a happier,
more fulfilled
person.
But for many longtime book lovers, the industry doesn't feel like a completely organic part of our reading
lives, either: Giving
people more control over how they lend, share, and sell their used books would be a big step.
(maybe most of you are too cool to remember that sort of moment... but think of something equally bad like the time you accidentally set something on fire and it started getting out of
control...) I think it will be worse than that... Seems like to me we need to be much, much,
more certain before we go making policy all
over the earth that could actually harm us... or maybe not quite so bad, but really not desirable, harm many developing countries and distract them from addressing real environmental land use and energy production problems that would actually help the environment and save human
lives now, today... but keep an eye on the future... not suggesting head in the sand stuff... just let's stop the panic... if you have to panic it's probly too late... most
people don't behave terribly rationally while panicing...
This gives customers
more control over their
life insurance and makes sure
people are thoroughly educated on the options that will work best for them.
Ultimately, in an impasse, each side fears losing something: In disputes
over Gun
Control, it is losing more innocent lives vs. losing personal safety and protection; in disputes over Immigration Reform, it is losing talented people and necessary social contributions of immigrants vs. losing potential American jobs; in disputes over the Debt Ceiling / Fiscal Cliff, it is losing on - going social programs vs. losing tax money to excessive interest payments; and, in disputes over Certification for Mediators, it is losing quality control for consumers vs. losing personal / professional autonomy to future regu
Control, it is losing
more innocent
lives vs. losing personal safety and protection; in disputes
over Immigration Reform, it is losing talented
people and necessary social contributions of immigrants vs. losing potential American jobs; in disputes
over the Debt Ceiling / Fiscal Cliff, it is losing on - going social programs vs. losing tax money to excessive interest payments; and, in disputes
over Certification for Mediators, it is losing quality
control for consumers vs. losing personal / professional autonomy to future regu
control for consumers vs. losing personal / professional autonomy to future regulators.
I understand that many
people are averse to
live video because they want
more control over how their videos are presented online.