Sentences with phrase «people on all sides seeing»

«I'm sure you'll have people on all sides seeing what they want to see in this situation,» he said.

Just as bad, the people on both sides saw the reform in the budget fight as business as usual.

That is to do with a sense that the public at large are in favour of these welfare reforms, so what a good opportunity some people on this side see to attack the unemployed.

Not exact matches

«The plus side of being on a broadcast network, though, is that many, many more people see the show.

So you have your earliest adopters who are very hard core on the engineering side, and now we're starting to see people who have experience at later - stage startups who understand the UX and business portion of it.

«There probably needs to be some education so we don't see people sitting on the side of their vehicle.»

In early Asian trade on Monday, the Shanghai bourse posted dramatic swings on either sides of the flatline and was last seen more than 2 percent lower, despite the People's Bank of China's (PBOC) bigger - than - expected easing package over the weekend.

Cable news, no matter what channel you're watching, has devolved into putting multiple people onscreen while they see who can talk the loudest and longest without ever recognizing that the person on the other side of the split screen may have a point.

You can extend the arm to the center of the car so people on both sides of the backseat can see.

«There is a material backlog of transactions that people have been looking to do on the M&A side, and it seems like we are primed to see a return to normalcy in the energy M&A transactions,» Getten said.

«We really tried to see what makes people tick on all sides of this, that was really important to us,» co-creator Drew Dowdle said.

A wise people, seeing the situation for what it truly is, would grapple with these harsh truths, determine a way to stop fighting literally on the other side of the world, and seek a settlement, not as victors, but as an honorable people.

When you mouse over the right side of the comment and click the x, you will be given several options: highlight it, allow it to be seen, hide it or delete it and ban that person from commenting on your page again.

On the positive side, it also allows you to see specifically what people are talking about at your business.

[16:00] Pain + reflection = progress [16:30] Creating a meritocracy to draw the best out of everybody [18:30] How to raise your probability of being right [18:50] Why we are conditioned to need to be right [19:30] The neuroscience factor [19:50] The habitual and environmental factor [20:20] How to get to the other side [21:20] Great collective decision - making [21:50] The 5 things you need to be successful [21:55] Create audacious goals [22:15] Why you need problems [22:25] Diagnose the problems to determine the root causes [22:50] Determine the design for what you will do about the root causes [23:00] Decide to work with people who are strong where you are weak [23:15] Push through to results [23:20] The loop of success [24:15] Ray's new instinctual approach to failure [24:40] Tony's ritual after every event [25:30] The review that changed Ray's outlook on leadership [27:30] Creating new policies based on fairness and truth [28:00] What people are missing about Ray's culture [29:30] Creating meaningful work and meaningful relationships [30:15] The importance of radical honesty [30:50] Thoughtful disagreement [32:10] Why it was the relationships that changed Ray's life [33:10] Ray's biggest weakness and how he overcame it [34:30] The jungle metaphor [36:00] The dot collector — deciding what to listen to [40:15] The wanting of meritocratic decision - making [41:40] How to see bubbles and busts [42:40] Productivity [43:00] Where we are in the cycle [43:40] What the Fed will do [44:05] We are late in the long - term debt cycle [44:30] Long - term debt is going to be squeezing us [45:00] We have 2 economies [45:30] This year is very similar to 1937 [46:10] The top tenth of the top 1 % of wealth = bottom 90 % combined [46:25] How this creates populism [47:00] The economy for the bottom 60 % isn't growing [48:20] If you look at averages, the country is in a bind [49:10] What are the overarching principles that bind us together?

Don't take my word for it, let's see what other people (on the buy side) are saying about the state of sales development today.

«I'd argue it's more on the psychological side of things, whereby people see a new major policy pointed at the housing market and take a bit of a step back, temporarily reassess where they are in the marketplace before perhaps moving back into the market.»

«I believe it is a matter of fundamental fairness that the American people be allowed to see both sides of the argument and make their own judgment,» Schumer wrote in a letter to the president released on Sunday.

It helps to figure out — early on — which people within the prospect organization are most likely to be on your side and who have a vested interest in seeing you succeed.

On the influencer side, the insights that you get with linking and tagging brands in Stories shows you how many people clicked on the link so you have a better idea of how much of an impact you're generating for brands and if I'm linking to a blog post (another way I drive traffic to my blog) then I can see how many people clicked on the link from my storieOn the influencer side, the insights that you get with linking and tagging brands in Stories shows you how many people clicked on the link so you have a better idea of how much of an impact you're generating for brands and if I'm linking to a blog post (another way I drive traffic to my blog) then I can see how many people clicked on the link from my storieon the link so you have a better idea of how much of an impact you're generating for brands and if I'm linking to a blog post (another way I drive traffic to my blog) then I can see how many people clicked on the link from my storieon the link from my stories.

I wonder what would happen over there if the world's people were to finally see the truth and realize that religion is being used to delude them into thinking world wars are the way of life — something that has to happen in order for... their glorious ascension into heaven or hell --(depending on who's side — re: religion — god — whatever — you are on).

This is the thing: when you start to hit 28 or 30, everything starts to divide, and you can see very clearly two kinds of people: on one side, people who have used their 20s to learn and grow, to find God and themselves and their deep dreams, people who know what works and what doesn't, who have pushed through to become real live adults.

The most loving thing that you can do to a dying person is talk to them about forgiveness through Jesus and seeing him on the other side, and then trusting the Holy Spirit to do his work while you speak.

Considering some of the flack people are posting, I guess this is a sort of article like what I was hoping to see, but the ridiculousness of a Jewish FB clone called «FaceGlat» is sort of on the lame side.

So the thing is, when you see someone say they don't want the bible, christianity or any theology pushed down their throats, it's not only because of the constant annoyance of dealing with people walking up to my door, people on the side of the street, coworkers, etc..

Some might see glaring faults from a guy named «Attack of the 50 Foot Magic Underwear» who seems to think he has the facts on his side, when in reality he is just as small - minded and un-educated as the people he professes to be better than.

Apparently CNN didn't realize people on both sides of the fence can recognize hypocrisy and publicity stunts when they see them.

We've actually seen where some people have come into the thread to give their side of the story, shed light on the other side, asked forgiveness where they were wrong, and requested forgiveness for where they were misunderstood or even falsely accused, and forgiveness was forthcoming.

People are funny creatures, but the genetics of our dangerous side run deep: See yesterday's NYT article on Violent Chimps for «fun» reading.

Whether in private conversation, group discussion, a sermon or a speech, or in the interaction within the community, the question is whether there is, on the one side, conviction about what the gospel means and, on the other side, unqualified readiness to hear the other people and see the world from their point of view.

We can see others not as foes and enemies, but as people who are on the other side of the galaxy from where we are at.

Since that day, I've seen both extremes of Christianity: The side of the pendulum where a room of people start speaking in strange tongues, to a service where I was looking to my friend for cues on when to sit, stand, speak and accept Holy Communion.

On a side note, it's odd to see people arguing over religion considering all of the other problems in America.

That's only useful when you need to rely upon talking people into seeing your point of view, and people with evidence on their side really shouldn't have to do that.

I might be ecelectic, but what makes me consistent is my belief is something that combines the belief of Scripture with that of Englightenment philosophy: nurturing life is goodness, simply, and helping others to see a model that thinking for ourselves can help heal the world of all past injustices - so that we all learn to WANT to be good... within reason and by our own choice...: you have a society like that, you'll have less injustices, less violence, less money - grubbing by people who hold themselves as representatives of «authority» -(which side are you on, by the way, if you see the world as so divided in such a bipolar reality...?)

This congress has gotten to the point where sacrifices are going to need to be made by people on both sides of the spectrum if we are going to see any real improvement in this deficit.

But when we see the people on the other side of the debate as the enemy (by calling them names, labeling them or demeaning their convictions), we miss the point of what «fighting for our faith» is supposed to be about in the first place.

These groups are going to tear us apart and I see fault on all sides just as a person who posted earlier.

On the other side, the fundamentalists and conservative evangelicals have begun to see that Christian atonement and redemption are not merely for individual appropriation in isolation but also take into account the whole person with his / her involvement in society and culture.

A well balanced person has a better grasp on truth than a person who can only see one side of life.

Amen.The thing is too many people from both sides try to disprove the other, Scientist (well some) will say there is no God Ala Hawkings here and then some believers will say that evolution or anything pertaining to science that they don't understand is false.I don't believe that science and God are mutually exclusive.For me personally science helps to explain a lot of things regarding creation, almost like giving me a window into how creative God is.I believe that God uses science to show us how awesome he is.To me science does not disprove Gods existence it actually reaffirms it on a human logic level, for me.You may disagree, that's fine, but this is just how I see it.

infact i would like to see an arguement with two sides that go like this, one is for hitler as for as his skill speaking and the other side argue for Cicero, both gave hour + long speeches that drove people to act on things they normally wouldn't have.

A very thought - provoking post and many of the feelings you have experienced are familiar to people of conscience, whether religious or other, but a pragmatic way of seeing the other side of the coin is that when you abandon the need to make money, (even just enough to live on), you by default, pass the responsibility for your survival to others.

I agree, sounds like she saw a market to make some money and randomly picked a side to go with and then misquoted and misinterperted the written facts and stamped her opinion on it to facilitate that specific group of people.

Consequently, most of the people on the favored side of the prosperity gap do not see AIDS as an eventual or indirect threat to their own well - being.

The conservative mass of people, recovering from the shock of civil war, acknowledged that Luther might be in the right on many matters but were waiting to see whether, after the war, an excommunicate and an outlaw still had might on his side.

I have been on both sides: I've allowed my ideas for the church to bring damage to it, and seen other people's ideas do the same.

I expected that some people would not understand or would disagree with my argument, but I did not expect the warm and genuinely excited reactions from those whose own experience has led them to see Christ on the other side of the long border between contemporary Catholic and evangelical religious experiences.

Many people had seen what had happened, so when Peter, John, and the formerly lame man emerged from the service, quite a crowd had gathered in the Court of the Gentiles and the Colonnade of Solomon on its east side.

I didn't need to add any, but I could see how some people would like their cranberry sauce on a sweeter side.