Dear Nial, I must commend you for your write up, infact i spend a lot of time on the forex factory forum trying to read
people opinion concerning upcoming news.
Not exact matches
Respecting other's
opinions and listening to real
concerns and questions - not barking out orders and expecting
people to follow, b / c they may for a day, month or so, but eventually they will leave, as they will not respect you, nor feel that you understand their position.
Question: Public
opinion in recent months has been very
concerned about the problem of divorced and remarried
persons.
The free exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and worship, without discrimination, shall forever hereafter be guaranteed; and no
person shall be denied any civil or political right, privilege or capacity, on account of his
opinions concerning religion; but the liberty of conscience hereby secured shall not be construed to dispense with oaths or affirmations, excuse acts of licentiousness or justify practices inconsistent with the good order, peace or safety of the state.
That magazine quotes you as saying that the computer - consensor has helped you «to recognize and address issues and
concerns that have special meaning» for your members, and that this
opinion - surveying gadget enables your
people express themselves on matters of faith and action when many of them would otherwise have remained silent.
Today our
concern to maintain freedom of the press and free speech must take into account new ways that the right of
people to form their
opinions can be limited.
Cq «Why consider the
opinions of one man
concerning another's divinity as more valid than, say, the
people who wrote of the Roman Emperors» divinity?»
Why consider the
opinions of one man
concerning another's divinity as more valid than, say, the
people who wrote of the Roman Emperors» divinity?
The Gospels, however, are of the
opinion that what happened to an actual
person on Golgotha is a religious
concern of the first order.
In this context, the tragedy of Oliver North is that the
opinions, thoughts and feelings of the
people and their elected representatives
concerning aid to the contras did not matter; what seemed to matter, in an unabashed exercise of unilateral power, was the provision of such aid, by whatever means, in the name of the national interest, patriotism, and fighting communism, by
people who in their actions were claiming they knew what was best for the United States.
Second, yes, my first post solely
concerns my
opinions: the suggestion that
people «should» grow up and quit trying to define their «authentic lives» through fantasies about passion and security.
They held 13 public hearings and in my
opinion seemed legitimately interested in and
concerned with what the
people had to say.
When next you want to know what IPOB is saying and the events
concerning Biafra, go to Family Writers Press (FWP) and stop forming your
opinion out of
people like you, who can sell even their boss, for political relevance.
There has been a fairly steady drift of
opinion and
people have continued to express their
concerns.
For questions specifically
concerning the manner in which
people's group identities and affiliations affect politics and political
opinion.
It's the law and
people like Mr. Yearwood (who in my
opinion is an arrogant and insensitive man) does not care if a
concerned mother like Mrs. Kimberly Puccia (who was only waiting to make sure that her child got into the dance school building safely) receive's a ticket by one of his Traffic Agent's under his command.
A new NIST study — with findings based on the
concerns, insights and
opinions of
people with mobility impairments voiced during interviews — provides guidance for helping them get safely out of multistory buildings during emergencies, including the use of special evacuation elevators.
Because medical
opinion insists that Toxoplasma is nearly always harmless, a cause for
concern only to pregnant women and
people with a weakened immune system.
«Social fear is caused by being overly
concerned with the risks associated with facing a social situation and prevents
people from going new places, making new friends, starting conversations or expressing
opinions.
In my
opinion the health benefits far outreach glutamate
concerns for most
people.
The Greek philosopher Epictetus said it beautifully more than 2,000 years ago: «
People are disturbed, not by things (that happen to them), but by the principles and
opinions which they form
concerning (those) things.
If you think about it, the
person who would even go for this type of look is someone who is not really
concerned with the thoughts and
opinions of others.
(Give up your
concern over other
peoples»
opinions, I mean — not your healthy choices.)
Keep dialogue on the dating website until you have built rapport; Be yourself — imperfections and all; Report any
concerns to our moderators; Respect others»
opinions and decisions; Consult our Customer Care team for advice; Don't «spam» a number of
people with the same message; Don't be rude, lewd or offensive Unfortunately, we do not presently know of any customer service phone number for DatingDirect.
Another PBS lesson plan on civil disobedience asks students to identify «issues of
concern» (such as school uniforms or a tax exemption for a business that pollutes), «brainstorm different ways
people make their
opinions known about issues of
concern,» «discuss which of these methods are acceptable» means of protest to them,» and «identify possible negative consequences of activism to individuals engaged in these activities.»
When considering ways to enhance a student's memory, to make foundational knowledge and skills «stick» better for when students take the Common Core tests or other knowledge assessments, I have little
concern with the actual content that too many
people have
opinions on.
Even community based organizations are
concerned with Student Voice, working with young
people to make their
opinions, ideas, knowledge, and actions heard by adults who are indifferent.
I don't mind answering questions anyone may have about the Vault, but I'd really appreciate it if
people who've come to express a negative
opinion would peruse the Vault site and FAQ first, to see if their
concerns have already been addressed there.
If I was
concerned about other
people's
opinions I would never have published my first hub years ago.
Critical personal
opinions regarding
persons other than yourself, judging outcome of any event, including derogatory comments
concerning a judge, placements or any participant (
Person or Dog), should be avoided on publicly available media (either a post to a List, a web page, public chat room or an e-mail to the general public).
I knew I would need more than just one
opinion to support my claim that you can trust Dog Food Advisor, but my prime
concern was, is it just me or other
people also trust the website.
While individual
opinions will form on the quality of work shown and
people may talk of dilution, that is not the
concern of BOS.
However, I have very little idea what the effects of AGW on humanity will be beyond the fact that it is an ecological disaster which can kill lots of
people in the developing world (excellent reasons to do whatever it takes to get rid of it, in my
opinion) and so I have a problem with responding to the argument that we need do nothing because at least as far as the DEVELOPED world is
concerned AGW will be at most a nuisance.
Of course motivated reasoning most likely plays a big part, as I have a generally low
opinion of
people who like to talk of
concern for «future generations» while studiously ignoring the generations currently alive.
If that was not the case, then
opinion polls would not be indicating that global warming / scary weather / melting ice would not be about dead last on the list of things that most
people are
concerned about.
The
people of Earth need fresh water and we all need to be more
concerned about having more of it, even it takes more energy to make it or having to listen to the fearmongering of Leftist
opinion - makers like Obama and Kerry who claim respectively that, «no challenge — poses a greater threat to future generations than climate change,» and, that global warming is, «perhaps the world's most fearsome weapon of mass destruction.»
So, this is the
opinion of
people who are seriously
concerned with anthropogenic climate change (me), neutral (TerjeP) and unconcerned (gallopingcamel).
MC: That might be the cause, but on the other hand you look at public
opinion polls about issues that are of
concern to the American public, and climate change just isn't near the top of those lists, and maybe they made a calculated decision that a more sellable approach would be to focus on energy independence and self - sufficiency, because that's something that
people have already bought.
If
people self - describe as skeptics, and if they are
concerned about activism and politicization affecting public
opinion relative to science, then it stands to reason that they wouldn't make repeated claims about a cause - and - effect w / o having evidence in support.
If the intent of the epistemic level applies beyond weighing
opinions, then it might be relevant to the level of courtesy extended, and the depth presented, in answering the
concerns of
people —
people who express an
opinion or curiosity about the substance of the science of climate.
My guess is that this, more than the
opinion of
people in other countries or whether his next paper or grant would be accepted, was the
concern that made him change course.
And when it is a public policy issue on which we propose to force a solution on
people who don't agree, is it right that we steam - roll over their
concerns in the firm conviction that their
opinions don't matter because * we * know we're right?
Whatever Judith's
opinion may be regarding the personal behaviour of
person or
persons concerned, she shouldn't let that influence her
opinion scientifically.
Luckily — from the perspective of
people who like a bit of convenience, even if they're not terribly
concerned about data privacy — a string of legal ethical
opinions, including Formal
Opinion No. 99 - 413 of the American Bar Association and the Law Society of BC's April 1998 opinion on the transmission of confidential information over the internet, seemed to offer near - absolution to lawyers from concern over unencrypted
Opinion No. 99 - 413 of the American Bar Association and the Law Society of BC's April 1998
opinion on the transmission of confidential information over the internet, seemed to offer near - absolution to lawyers from concern over unencrypted
opinion on the transmission of confidential information over the internet, seemed to offer near - absolution to lawyers from
concern over unencrypted email.
1 To the extent that you are not a public figure and this is not a matter of public
concern, even a negligent misrepresentation about what you actually wrote on Facebook, that is not a statement of
opinion and is not accompanied by a reference allowing someone to confirm the accuracy of the statement at the source, could give rise to legal liability on the part of the
person giving the tip.
penalizes the defendant for engaging in public participation «plaintiff» means a
person who initiates or maintains a proceeding against a defendant; «proceeding» means any action, suit, matter, cause, counterclaim, appeal, or originating application that is brought in the Supreme Court or the Provincial Court, but does not include a prosecution for an offence or a crime; «public interest» means the whole of the subject matter invites public attention, or a matter in which the public has some substantial
concern because it affects the welfare of citizens, or one to which considerable public notoriety or controversy has attached; «public participation» means communication or conduct aimed at influencing public
opinion, or promoting further lawful action by the public or any government body, in relation to an issue of public interest; «Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP)» means a claim that arises from a form of expression or public participation, by the
person against whom the claim is asserted that was made in connection with an official proceeding or about a matter of public interest; Purposes of this Act: 2 The purposes of this Act are to a) Establish a statutory right to public participation for every individual; b) Encourage individuals to express themselves on matters of public interest; c) Promote broad participation in debates on matters of public interest; d) Discourage the use of litigation as a means of unduly limiting expression on matters of public interest; and, e) Preserve the right of access to the courts for all proceedings and claims that are not brought or maintained for an improper purpose.
The state House Insurance Committee is listening to all the
opinions of
people concerning the issue of changing the maximum coverage of the no - fault insurance system.
«We can not comment on... articles which are mainly comprised of information that the reporters allegedly obtained from an «an anonymous
person concerned» as well as the reporters»
opinions and speculations based upon such information,» Nintendo told the E-Commerce Times in a statement provided by company spokesperson Ashton Shurson.
The
concerned person in this case uses the template to compose an official letter addressed to the authority concisely stating his / her
opinions or response.
The International Court of Justice notes in its Advisory
Opinion on Western Sahara, the essential requirement for self - determination is that the outcome corresponds to the free and voluntary choice of the
people concerned.