Why should
people other than political scientists become or be allowed to be politicians?
Clinton will likely win the nomination, Bernie will grudgingly endorse her, and few
people other than political technology nerds will give it much thought.
Not exact matches
Rush Limbaugh has done more to destroy and dumb down
political discourse in this country
than any
other person in its history.
Reflect on this a little: Many of the inspirations of the threefold system of
political economy derive from evangelical inspirations such as personal creativity, personal responsibility, freedom, the love for community through association and mutual cooperation, the aim of bettering the condition of every
person on earth, the cultivation of the rule of law, respect for the natural rights of
others, the preference for persuasion by reason rather
than by coercion, and a powerful sense of sin.
Christendom: I think that Christianity as a religion, which purports to call
people to follow Jesus, but uses money, power, and
political prestige to force «Christianity» on
others, is nothing
other than the adoption of all the things which Satan promised Jesus in Luke 4, but which Jesus turned down.
too true; you're right, we are holistic
people in a holistic world living holistic lives and
political theory, religion, ethics, behavior, psychology, these and many
others are all so inextricably intertwined with each
other that it may be better to think of them as different views of the same object rather
than distinct objects that are inter-related (using «object» here, of course, metaphorically)
The claim of my nonpacifist colleagues that the system they are using is more socially responsible, more understandable to ordinary
people, more culturally accessible to
people of
other value communities, more able to manage with discrimination the factual data of
political decisions,
than is my testimony to Jesus» words and work, still has the burden of proof.
Although they will be «independent
persons with no
other authority
than that of the spirit,» they may yet be effective in the time that approaches as no merely
political representatives can be.
«Executive,» «laborer,» «Catholic,» «Southern Baptist,» «Jew,» «Democrat,» «Republican,» «Socialist,» for example, are proper designations of occupational, religious, or
political affiliation, but may under undemocratic pressures become class symbols which divide
people into comprehensive separate groups for
other than occupational, religious, or
political purposes.
The
people of the nations that have newly won independence from imperial control are exhilarated by the prospect of a brighter future in the
political firmament, and
peoples whose resources have long been exploited for the enrichment of
others now see their own prospects for material improvement happier
than ever before.
85 But characteristically he went on to praise America for its democracy: «Democracy is an ultimate norm of
political organization in the sense that no better way has been found to check the inordinacy of the powerful on the one hand and the confusion of the multitude on the
other than by making every center of power responsible to the
people whom it affects.»
Political power is damned rather
than the
person who exercises it; more precisely, the
person is also condemned because of his power over
others, but not in himself.
Neville there were times when dominionism worked for Israel which were the exceptions rather
than the rule but generally it did nt sadly because of the wickedness of
peoples hearts.Power tends to corrupt
people ie in the case of nebbucanezzar especially when they succeed.Like you i think Gods
people have more impact by just letting Christ work through them could be me but i find politics tends to involve power money and compromise.Regardless of what
political state we find ourselves Gods sovereign and his will be done on earth as it is in heaven.My focus is real simple just follow Jesus with all my heart mind soul and strength and love
others as myself and that is just following Jesus daily and trusting him in everything.regards brentnz
The problem is that organized religion is as much
political animal as any
other human convention involving more
than 2
people, and spiritual, thinking individuals are intelligent enough to know that churches / mosques / community reprogramming centers actually have very little to do with what one actually believes...
By the end of the Assembly, as Kenneth Slack pointed out, «most of the members felt that there was more danger from undue stress on the evangelism of individuals
than the
other way round, despite widely expressed anxiety, given expression by Stott, that liberation in
political, social and economic sense was in danger of replacing salvation from sin at the heart of the redeeming gospel».73 There was no doubt that, despite the narrowing of the range of disagreements, important differences continued, especially with regard to the meaning of salvation and the program of dialogue with
people of
other faiths.
In
other words, Francis told Cubans that they are no worse off
than any
other people on earth after fifty - six years of economic and
political repression, and that they really have nothing to complain about.
But these same
people have no more expertise
than others (and usually less) in designing practicable programs for
political action.
So by large, the
people who buy into santorums demagoging are infact
people with a shakey grasp on both reality and science and CAN be likened to the taliban whom they share more traits with
than ANY
other political / social system.
However, such metaphoric language is more
than ornament, affecting
people's conceptual systems and thought processes, influencing how they perceive
others, and determining their
political views and behavior.
Overreacting, there are those who doubt that one
person, one
political party, and one set of values can be better
than any
other.
Those are the
people whom social conservatives need to reach if our
political future is to hold anything
other than endless defeat.
And, even worse, because of this power given to them by the church, they executed
people who had done nothing wrong
other than be
political enemies, CLAIMING heresy.
Fowler confirms what we have all known for decades, and can not paper over or bluff past:
people need and find churches for reasons
other than direct
political expression.
It's hard to think about anything
other than the current
political climate and all of the horror that is being inflicted upon
people, from this ban to the struggle of so many
other people in this country, but it's important to rest and stay focused and spend some time re-energizing yourself.
The main reasons it wasn't adopted more widely yet is because it isn't as intuitive to understand as most
other systems, counting the votes takes longer
than with single - vote systems and of course because of
people who reject it for purely
political reasons.
STRANEK added that «An Allegation by no mean a
person other than a Minister of State can not be seen as a mere
political gimmick and as such must be investigated and perpetrators prosecuted and if proven guilty jailed.»
With the (arguable) exception of football and the Grand National, I tend to make predictions where I think I have better information
than other people opining on them (
political events; leadership contests, etc).
The
people believing in the said false representation parted with ownership of their properties (goats, sheep, Cow, monies etc) An Allegation by no mean a
person other than a Minister of State can not be seen as a mere
political gimmick and as such must be investigated and perpetrators prosecuted and if proven guilty jailed.
Against the rules, but since the enforcers of the rules are the
people who decided to ignore them, not sure if there is formal recourse,
other than stern disapproval, the making of
political hay, and storing it in memory for an eventual tit for tat payback.
It's basically a theory that white
people in western countries have more societal privileges
than people of
other ethnicities who come from the same
political, social and economic class.
According to its Audit of
Political Engagement, people are more likely to sign a petition than engage in any other polit
Political Engagement,
people are more likely to sign a petition
than engage in any
other politicalpolitical act.
Subject to the provisions of this article, a
political party is free to participate in shaping the
political will of the
people, to disseminate information on
political ideas, social and economic programmes of a national character, and sponsor candidates for elections to any public office
other than to District Assemblies or lower local government units.
«There is no more important effort
than the protection and expansion of the rights and liberties of the
people,» said Richard Brodsky, a
political scientist at the Wagner Graduate School of Public Service and a former assemblyman who is working with
other groups supporting a convention.
She said they should stop being «
political pundits» and added: «We don't want anybody who is part of Labour's team in Parliament giving
people the impression we are anything
other than completely focused on giving the help they need at this time.»
People who voted Conservative in 2010 are more likely to agree (44 %)
than disagree (34 %) that UKIP are more honest
than other political parties.
Mahoney knows
people are watching, and she warns her
political appointees that they will be held to a higher standard
than other county employees.
I suppose that all of this publicity about nothing, for a
person of no
political consequence
other than being somebody's girlfriend is a run - up to a senatorial candidacy.
And actually, at the minute I'm better placed to do that
than most
other people in the
political sphere.»
«I need to be in a position that
other people will think of this logically rather
than simply fold to a
political pressure.»
Reacting to the various verbal attacks fired against each
other by various
political camps engaged in campaign activities for the Anambra governorship election, the CLO said that nothing could be so callous
than people playing politics with human blood.
The big question, that of their leadership, will probably not be much informed by polling — after all, Charlie Kennedy, while few
people's choice for Prime Minister, is generally far more positively rated
than any
other political leader.
«From my vantage point in Atlanta, I wouldn't say that Andrew Cuomo stood out more
than other people,» said Andra Gillespie, an associate professor of
political science at Emory University who has written a book about another possible Democratic presidential candidate, Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey.
He said «Sharafadeen stands a very height chance to clinch the PDP ticket, even by his
political antecedents he has it
than any
other person.
We need to make sure that we are in control over the things that affects us.Anytime there is flood and
people loose their life, most of the blame goes to sitting presidents.I am not saying that the central government does not have responsibility to ensure that enabling environment is created.They have a great work to do but as citizens what is our quota?When you move around Accra, sometimes i becomes angry within myself because i am in doubt as to whether our sanitation laws exit.
People because of the tax they claim they pay waits for zoom lion workers to come and clean the choked gutters before our houses and shops either
than that, it will remain like that.Is it modernity or civilization that has turned us to forget our traditional values or duties of ensuring that our environments is clean?Everybody in our Ghanaian setting knows the responsibility of men and women in making sure that our environments are clean not waiting for flood to occur and we start blaming sitting presidents.To the media, though your responsibility is to keep governments on it toes, you equally have a mandate in educating the public of what we are expected to do as citizens in
other to ensure that our dear nation is a better ecosystem for all of us to live.The attention of the media should be shifted from making politicians popular to making us aware as citizens of our responsibilities.I sometimes get confused to hear journalists calling opponents to comment on issues concerning the sitting governments and the only thing that comes to my mind is what do the journalist want to hear from the
political opponents?Nothing.They will end up criticizing without giving an alternative.The media should rather resort in questioning
people directly to where the problems are coming from.Let us build our institutions.When it comes to energy issues.Citifm will call Hon.KT Hammond who was a deputy minister living who he worked under (His boss at that time) and I always become confused because what can we expect from him?nothing.
«And Lord Ashcroft has been, off his own bat — all credit to him — more candid about his tax status
than lots of
people who support
other political parties.
Olivier Dubois, secretary - general of the National Order of Medical Doctors in Paris, argues that French
people need more treatment for depression and anxiety because of the country's high unemployment,
political malaise, urban noise — which makes sleeping difficult — and the fact that the French were slower
than other Europeans to move to cities and are still adjusting.
Although a majority of working Americans (60 percent) indicated that
people at work are generally respectful toward
others with differing
political views, more
than a quarter (26 percent) have witnessed or overheard their coworkers arguing about politics, and about 1 in 10 (11 percent) have gotten into an argument themselves.
The
Other Side (PG for mature subject matter and mild epithets)
Political science documentary examining how the American
people have become more Balkanized
than ever before.
The anti-corporate subtext does give the piece a topical heft, though Verbinski and company aren't really going for any grand
political statements in this purely popcorn piece
other than to state that
people on the side of
people are good and
people on the side of greed at the expense of
people are evil.
Nothing in this title shall be deemed to exempt or relieve any
person from any liability, duty, penalty, or punishment provided by any present or future law of any State or
political subdivision of a State,
other than any such law which purports to require or permit the doing of any act which would be an unlawful employment practice under this title.