Sentences with phrase «people read the text»

It is as if few people read the text with an open mind and form insightful comments on the article itself.

Not exact matches

How people link to you and what the description reads in the incoming «backlink,» or anchor text, plays a key role.

But they don't like to receive voicemails (it's a lot quicker to read a text than it is to listen to the person talking to you).

It's almost impossible to get a good read on how a person is feeling through text.

People absorb information differently — some enjoy reading text while others are visual and engage more with photos or videos.

We also added some eye candy for the people who like to look at infographics more than reading a long text.

The thought of stolen email addresses and PII (personally identifiable information), and hackers being able to read private text messages and listen to baby monitors may be the things that get people motivated to fight back by switching to more secure email providers, turning on 2 - step verification, and buying their first cybersecurity products.

So people see them more than reading a text on facebook.

«You may have heard about a quiz app built by a university researcher that leaked Facebook data of millions of people in 2014,» read the ad, which featured black text on a white background, with the Facebook logo at the bottom.

ok you read the Bible and you know and feel it's right, and sure I believe you; now, there's lots of people that read the Bible and understands it differently and feel they are right, people that read the Qu «ran and feel it to be true, lots of people that read Buddhist texts and feel the same, lots of people that feels and sees and know for sure they are right and I believe them.

«god» doesn't exist and is make believe, your religious texts were written by human beings without any kind of «divine inspiration» regardless of what you read in them... written by people who thought the Earth was flat... it isn't.

After reading the epilogues one is drawn back to the text itself, and I have found it inviting to be greeted by a clean page (without my old markings) as I read it now, a different person than I was thirty years ago.

This is fascinating — I think a lot of people who are basically atheists «try» religion in this sense — reading sacred texts, reciting prayers, even attending church.

Using books of the Bible as their primary texts, and following a set pattern, one person would read the text in Hebrew, and another would interpret it into Greek, and then the text would be explained and applied (cf. Acts 2:42; 13:14 - 15; 14:1 - 3; 15:21; 18:4; 19:8 - 10; etc.).

It is forgotten that Scripture is read in worship not as a sermon text but as God's word to God's people.

In theological studies, however, I frequently encounter people who read a text of Scripture that seems difficult to them and their preconceived ideas of what should be in the Bible, and when they read these troublesome texts, they jump straight to the conclusion that best fits their current theological system.

How and what texts are produced, what people read, and what people look for in reading is changed.

Any person who reads into the history of Christianity will find that there were many competing schools of thought when the religion was founded, and there are nuances of meaning within the text that were lost in translation.

When people do not have texts before them to read, they must have images to visualize while thinking about what the preacher is doing with the text for the Sunday.

There are some cultural things going on here with the act of baptism, and the fact that family members and servants usually followed the religion of the head of their household, but again, the most straightforward way of reading these texts is that more than one person believed, and those that did believe were baptized.

The problem with theology is that people read back into the text the ideas that they have established out of the text.

and that just as you want them to listen to how you arrived at your conclusions regarding the text (and don't say, «I just read the Bible,» because you didn't), so also, that other person likely engaged in deep study of the biblical text to arrive at their understanding and it would benefit you to hear how they came to their understanding.

Disagree with the other person if you want to, but recognize that they are trying to understand and explain the text just as much as you are, and that just as you want them to listen to how you arrived at your conclusions regarding the text (and don't say, «I just read the Bible,» because you didn't), so also, that other person likely engaged in deep study of the biblical text to arrive at their understanding and it would benefit you to hear how they came to their understanding.

If you read some of the ancient sermon texts, even from the very beginning of institutional Christianity in the fourth century, you can often read between the lines of these sermons and see that the Bishops and Priests had such people in their congregations, and were cajoling them and guilting them back into conformity, and even sometimes persecuting them for «abandoning Jesus and the church.»

We must rediscover myth and symbol in reading biblical texts, and help our people to escape the leaden touch of literalism.

People planning to read the Qur» an face two questions Which English version of the text is preferable?

6th probably 99.9 % of those people probably don't read the original language texts and probably don't share the faith alone positions that are becoming so very rare today.

We will read the imperfect translations of those imperfect critical editions of the text when we preach, invite people to the Lord's table, discuss social ministry, baptize new Christians or bury our dead.

He wants so badly to make this a story that includes a conversion experience, a story about God using sinful people to accomplish His purposes, a story about a sexually promiscuous woman who finds Jesus, that he reads too much into the text.

its so amazing there people is this world are so caught up in living for themselves, what if the rapture happened while reading my text, what then, will you stil care what clothes you are wearing or what what car you are driving,, while GOD is removed from this earth, and now society will have to make a real decision if they want to contine to live in sin or realize they now understand the truth and the warnings given before, but now bc of the anti christ have to denounce GOD (take the mark of the beast) or be killed, and if you do nt believe in christ now, will you be willing to die for christ then, i would rather be ridiculed by the world for being a true christian then be gay, seperated from GOD, and then cast in the lake of fire for all eternity tormented bc i refused to repent bc i wanted to live for myself, ready the story about the man in hades who to this day, still has not had a drop of water on his tongue to quench is thirst, THE BIBLE WAS WRITEN BC HELL IS REAL AND GOD IS REAL, DO NOT BE DECEIVED, YOU HAVE TO MAKE A CHOICE WHO YOU WILL SERVE, THE NARROW ROAD WHICH LEADS TO LIFE OR THE WIDE, AND IF GOD CALLS YOU AND YOUR STILL ON THE FENCE, IN GODS EYES YOU HAVE ALREADY MADE A CHOICE, THE BIG QUESTION IS: WILL THE LIFE YOUR NOW LIVING BE WORTH SPENDING ETERNITY IN LAKE OF FIRE?

Working through the biblical account step by step, Ellul reads the text carefully, finding hints of how God works through people, those who are faithful, as well as those who are not.

The so - called scriptural basis for saying gay people aren't ok is mostly based on a very few readings taken out - of context with added interpretations that aren't in the text at all.

People who come here are experts in their field, they want to know that if you're telling me something about an ancient text that you're an expert in that, or that you're reading what I'm reading.

As artistically constructed texts, they, by the signs that constitute them, put forward potential narrative worlds; and we, by the activity of reading, (1) transform those signs into people, places, actions, and teaching and (2) concomitantly create discrete, self - contained story worlds.

You have no idea how big it is, probably because the only book you've ever read is a 2,000 year old text written by cave people.

To this, the most widely read single text in the history of pastoral care, may be added his letters of pastoral instruction to various persons in ministry concerning the special situations they were confronting.

For Bell, there was something about standing up in front of a group of people and reading «an ancient text and then unleashing it in the space» that changed him.

Now ask yourself why you assumed people are angry when you read that text because it will explain your negative outlook on life.

When millions of people over thousands of years read the same text, that's going to happen, and in a lot of ways it's good for the Church.

It's probably for text like this that the Catholic Church had forbidden people from reading the Bible!

While some of the keys to attracting readers include writing valuable content, having error - free text, and using a clean blog layout, one of the most overlooked elements in getting people to read your blog is being -LSB-...]

When people expect to get history, science, doctrine, and ethics out of the Bible, but end up with nothing of the sort, or what they do get does not agree with science, history, or the doctrine of others, they either reject the whole thing as fiction, or they blindly believe and obey what they read, because they don't know what else to do with the text.

You have evidently only listened to people talk about ancient texts and not read any for yourself.

It would serve well for examples of how the text could be taught and preached, and would remind those who read it to remember the needs and questions of the people who will be listening.

Across England and Scotland were secret groups of Lollards, a network of people who for a century now had nurtured among themselves a tradition of reading translations of the text of the Bible in manuscript excerpts from various popular sections of the Old and New Testaments, and occasionally from the complete edition of Wycliffe's (or Purvey's) fourteenth - century translation, rare though it was, the only English translation in existence.

Furthermore, such challenges must be from the text itself, not a matter of the preacher's preference for one interpretation, or of a psychological reading into the text of the supposed motives of people in such situations as Jonah's.

This requires a close reading of the text, over against what people remember from the story.

My aim was to write the main body of the text so that it could be read by a wide array of people, sort of in the manner of bell hooks.

Yes, there's always someone who can find a «proof text» for almost anything, but fails to read the Gospel accounts about how Jesus actually treated people, and his direction to «go and do likewise».

You might choose to have a bit more text on signs people can read from in front of your stall.