Sentences with phrase «people reading it view»

When I write about interaction, most people reading it view it in the context of software or some form of digital technology.

Not exact matches

Three facets of today's U.S. civic discourse would worry the Framers, said Eisgruber: «mistrust of institutions,» which they considered crucial to forming a republic; the «geographic sorting» that finds people of like - minded views grouping together rather than being more evenly distributed throughout the country; and the rise of technologies (read: Facebook) that are keeping people from reading facts and views that give them proper «civic understanding.»

The conflicting views are capturing the endemic paradox of the e-readers themselves, where more people are likely to migrate to a better reading experience.

Often people don't fully read the articles, completely view the videos or even glance at the images they retweet.

Mozilla has also integrated the popular app Pocket, lets people save web content for later readings and viewings, into the new Firefox Quantum.

«Reading can offer richer, broader and more complex models of experience, which enable people to view their own lives from a refreshed perspective and with renewed understanding,» says Josie Billington of the University of Liverpool, who's an expert on the effects of rReading can offer richer, broader and more complex models of experience, which enable people to view their own lives from a refreshed perspective and with renewed understanding,» says Josie Billington of the University of Liverpool, who's an expert on the effects of readingreading.

Basically, the idea is to create pieces of content (written, visual, audio, etc.) that people want to read, view, or listen to, and tie those pieces of content to your brand to build awareness, equity, and authority.

I've read so many people's view's and blogs and everyone has an opinion on active vs passive vs providers vs assets mix vs.......

I will find it surprising if a person that has read the Bible, agrees with the author's views in this article.

People who read news websites and then post comments tend to have strong political views.

People need not only to read widely at an early age, but to get out and meet people with differing People need not only to read widely at an early age, but to get out and meet people with differing people with differing views.

We get to read religious views from people who know nothing of religion and scientific views from people who have no clue about science.

It saddens me that people only read the news and allow the media to direct their views and thinking processes.

Try reading Karen Armstrong's History of God for a detailed analysis of how God has evolved, or people's view of God has evolved if you prefer, over history.Either God is changing, or people's views of who and what God is has changed.

You said in the article that people were mean and that Jesus loved everyone and this led to you reading books by people branded heretics and it changed your view on CHristianity and how you read the Bible..

If the people like those whose posts we read here, are the ones whose views, teachings and counsel our children will inherit, what will their destiny end up to be?

It's easy for people who are more liberal on this issue to claim the pastoral high ground (indeed, Chalke's piece is partly pastorally motivated), but that ignores many who will be hurt to read his change of view, and what they will regard as a sharp shift from scripture.

The main issue here is difficult to pin down precisely, but it has to do with the impression one gains from reading Berger that people act like amateur philosophers in constructing their religious views.

As an Atheist, I let my children read as they see fit, but I limit their private exposure to religious people, particularly keeping him away from groups with extreme views.

from what i read the american people are idolizing the bald eagle which also from a religous point of view is agianst God's law.

For example, people reading this exchange with a view to assessing the validity of Madden's criticisms of my position and the soundness of my rebuttal are acting on one of practical reason's per se nota first principles» namely, that intellectual understanding of matters such as those under discussion is something worth having and expending time and effort to achieve.

But I am hopeful, because the experience of leaving that job opened my eyes and mind to a whole new way of viewing people, thinking about theology, reading Scripture, interacting with others, and ultimately, living life.

The difference between you and me is that, when I read the Bible... I read it from the point of view of what I know about the natural world — as people know it today.

Since that time, my new blog has received over 1.6 million page views and has been read by people in almost every country of the world.

Yes, the way we read what the Bible says affects our view of not only God, but also of other people.

«If he expressed no view I don't think anybody is of right to interpret and read the mind of the person... we do not have a window into people's soul.

It is a matter of serious consequence for theologians when a film based on religious subject matter is made, because more people will be likely to view that film than have read the New Testament in all history.

«24 His own positive view of globalization reads thus: «The Trinity, as mystery of communion of the three Divine Persons, has always given herself to creation as well as to the life of every single human being, and has revealed herself — under the forms of sociability, mutual openness, love and self - giving, but also accusation and protest against the lack of such values — to the communities of humanity.

If you are at all interested in learning more about how and why people who love Jesus — why long time faithful disciples who have a high view of Scripture with a deeply Christian ethic around sexuality — are arriving at this conclusion, I would commend to you a season of bible study and theological reading and prayer in company with the Holy Spirit and the body of Christ.

But the vast majority of people will be disturbed just by reading about these scenes, let alone viewing them on the big screen.

The various reading strategies that Seibert proposes in the book go a long way toward helping Christians view others through the lens of Jesus Christ, so that rather than view them as enemies to be killed, we see them as people for whom Jesus died.

Since there are many new readers on this blog, and since probably everyone who has been here longer than a year has forgotten the basic argument I am trying to present, I figured I would spend one post summarizing my view and inviting people to go back and read some of what I have written previously only this topic.

And from our point of view, there's always the chance that the person who as a scholar seriously reads Sade will seriously read his critics.

First, when offering criticism it is important to give the most charitable reading of a person's views — even when you critique them.

The bottom line was that this pastor didn't like what I was saying, and therefore, didn't like that people were reading what I was teaching, and viewed any form of trying to get my message out as self - promotion.

i was a devout believer once... i have read the bible many times from an unbiased point of view — the issues came when i asked questions and people kept sayin you HAVE TO TAKE IT ON FAITH... if faith is all thats needed, why the book, why the 10 commanments????? i have seen horrors in life, and in my lifetime — stuff that if god existed then i find him no more worth worshiping then the pipe that helps me sleep at night.

Many people have a wrong view of history, God, and human nature so if you want real answers as to why death, suffering, and evil exist read this http://www.answersingenesis.org/assets/pdf/radio/death-and-suffering.pdf

Fifty million people paid good money to read Hal Lindsey's view of the end.

In light of our conversation about Anne Frank yesterday, I thought I'd re-post this rather lengthy piece from 2008 (back when I thought people liked to read 1,000 - word blog posts) that details some of the biblical support for a more inclusive view of salvation.

«In fact, this model can easily lead people to develop learning phobias, for if you dare to read broadly and learn to see things from other people's point of view, you might uncovering facts that could shake your certainty and thus displease God.

I have found my training posts are my most viewed... which surprises me, but I guess we learn what people want to read Tina Muir recently posted... Pool Running to Maintain Fitness During Injury

Media is happy to paint what - ever picture will get the most views and the WengerOut / WengerIn debate is like turning lead into gold for them, they will keep using it to get people reading and happy to perpetuate misinformation for the continued views.

admin I like your site and I love reading views and expressions from the people of this site whether I agree with them or not.

You made me laugh with your Wenger statement and I can not recall another person who I have known with such different views who I look forward to reading.

It's been nice to read a page that so far people are able to have different views and has yet to have a load of hysterical AKB's trying to deny that changes are badly needed and telling everybody to support another team if they want to see changes.

He played CB in that game and was actually viewed in the long run as a CB from by the club though he's a dm.He plays CB just as well as he plays DM because of his solidity and reading of the game.Just look at the position he played for Arsenal in the senior team.He's gonna be a big loss but the funny thing is people expect his name to fade away.

Instead of a few thousand people being able to view the game, millions can read about it for 35 cents, much more democratic!

Well it is good to see Moncs with the view that Nobes is dropable.Im fed up of reading people say he is undropable & anyone who dares mention it is on a witch hunt against the lad.Maybe they will accuse Moncs of being oart of the conspiracy now, lol

I get really annoyed when I read about bloggers and media outlets bashing people because they don't agree with their views.

In the introduction to his new cookbook, How to Bake Everything, Mark Bittman says he disagrees with people who «view cooking and baking as opposites: They believe the former welcomes improvisation and rule - breaking while the latter is unforgiving,... [Continue reading]