Sentences with phrase «people see evidence»

And, as Martinez says, when you achieve great results, «you should let people see the evidence that it's working.»

A minority of people see no evidence for God, they are called atheists.

You said, «It is the fact — yes, fact — that millions of people see evidence for God.

Not exact matches

People who resist them will compile and present evidence proving their Or model correct and the And model wrong, which those of us who see opportunity to grow, learn, and improve our lives will see as showing their confirmation bias.

«When executives tell me that flattery doesn't work and that people can see through strategic efforts to garner their support, I cite extensive evidence showing that we are generally quite poor at discerning deception,» Pfeffer explains.

Do we see deeply quickly, or are we leaping to conclusions about people and ignoring evidence that contradicts our mental shorthand?

People want to see evidence that what you are offering really works and helps Ask your satisfied customers to share with you how they benefited from your product.

«The evidence that I have seen is that jobs are in fact increased because there is economic activity increased and because people have a little bit of spare money, which on $ 11 an hour you never have.»

In his evidence to the committee on Tuesday Wylie described the AIQ Trinidad project as a «pre-cursor to the Rippon project to see how much data could be pulled and could we profile different attributes in people».

But the FBI's statement is the latest piece of evidence that many people not only saw red flags in Cruz's behavior but tried to report them — and those warnings were not thoroughly pursued or fell on deaf ears.

Some people have pointed out that the price of bitcoin tends to dip around the time of the contract expirations, but I still haven't seen enough evidence to support this theory.

As evidence, witness this month's launch of Zelle, a new person - to - person (P2P) payment app that could be seen as the big banks» response to Paypal's very successful Venmo.

There is ample evidence for the existence of God, what you decide to do with this evidence is ultimately up to you, but do not claim that there is none... and I would submit to you that many people believe many things without evidence every single day... but do not lump all people of faith into one basket... I have personal proof that God exists, but proof for me may not be proof for you, some people can see something with their own eyes and still deny it, that is why I said it is ultimately up to you to decide what you believe... there is much evidence both for and against the existence of God, you need to decide which evidence you choose to believe...

Even though no one has seen God, all a person has to do is look a the evidence.

It's customary there for doctors when they see evidence of terminal cancer in a person, not to tell them the truth but to tell them that everything is okay because they feel that it's better to make the patient feel good and not upset.

Evidence shows them to have been like the mid-eastern peoples with enough genetic differentiation content in their DNA to eventually generate the different nationalities we see today which actually did not happen until after the flood.

Judge not lest ye be judged, we are all so quick to believe anything b4 all the facts in, people please be still and wait to see ALL the evidence.

Perhaps you should be looking into why other people think they «see» something that apparently has no evidence (by my definition) of its existence.

I see little evidence you want to debate, but just belittle people who have a worldview that differs from yours.

But quite honestly, I fail to see how the Mormon people can assert that Mary remained a virgin in light of this evidence from their prophets and apostles.

The people who could have reinforced my faith condemned me for daring to exercise it in the face of questions and conflicting evidence: not just encouraging me, but demanding me to believe that much harder in what I could not see.

But you can't tell a person who heard god speak (or saw a leprauchaun or threw a penny in a well and had the wish come true) that they don'thave evidence.

No has ever seen actual evidence of your brain or your soul, so we should also conclude that you have no brain and you as a person don't exist.

There is no evidence of a God and many of us have seen belief in God sometimes lead to bad things — probably because people assign power to God and then speak on his behalf (they «hear» what he says).

Still amazes me how people are so willing to follow an idea, a religion, a dude telling fairy tales from a stage, rather than the things that they see before them every day, and in doing so, tie everyday natural occurrences into evidence for the validity of their fairy tales.

You said, «As I have pointed out, there are millions of people, including myself, who see evidence for God.»

- «As I have pointed out, there are millions of people, including myself, who see evidence for God.»

Because I had pieced together one version of the events based on the evidence I had gathered at the time, and was hoping the people here could help me see where that version was faulty or inaccurate.

Many of the people who saw the resurrected Jesus that day eventually offered evidence that was written in their own blood.

I should point out that you are not in a genuine position to spearhead making sure that some «qualified mature people» reviews the evidence, both because you are a named accused and because you are have a financial interest in seeing Tony and Doug exonerated.

They are playing tricks with your mind so you don't see or care about evidence like this so they plan horrible things behind the curtain while people get upset over conterceptives you can still get.

He explains: «It is very easy to slip into disdain for people who don't see the evidence for biological evolution or who want to impose their views on others in a coercive way, such as in Muslim majority countries.»

When Ezra cries, «Thou our God hast punished us less than our iniquities deserve,» (Daniel 9:16) or a prayer in the Book of Nehemiah says, «Thou art just in all that is come upon us; for thou hast dealt truly, but we have done wickedly,» (Nehemiah 9:33) or Daniel exhausts tautology in confessing, «We have sinned, and have dealt perversely, and have done wickedly, and have rebelled,» (Daniel 9:5) we see the self - accusation which resulted from the acceptance of national misfortune not as an evidence of Yahweh's weakness in protecting his people but as proof of his inflexible righteousness.

i will tell you that the one thing that god gave us is the power of will or choice and that is why we can decide to do good or bad or follow him or not but the evidence of a true christian is that person life will change and not is a small way.my people open your eyes and do not be fools to believe that there is no god because you know in your own heart while you say it, deep inside you can see that a god do exist and i do not need to tell you that or prove it to you because you know it is true.unfortunately there are false preachers who do not teach the truth or a halph truth which has led millions down the wrong path and today we see the result of it everywhere.

As a scientist I always judge things on empirical evidence and he always has women ages 19 to 23 around him, but I've never seen anything else, so as a scientist, my presumption is that whatever the problems were I would believe him over other people.»

Many people seem much more willing to express opinions when they can do so anonymously, and they are more willing to speak when they see evidence on the screen that they are not alone in their views.

Literary criticism can only point to what a document meant to the person who wrote it — I don't see how it can be evidence that what they meant to communicate was actually true.

justpro86 Meanwhile, every ancient people could look up at the sky and see evidence for their gods,... different gods.

Douglas adds, with respect to the equally common assumption that people of past ages were spiritually and (hence) generally fulfilled, that she can see «no evidence that there is more unhappiness and mental disturbance now than in those famous ages of faith.

Dalahäst If people actually questioned evolution it would be one thing, but almost everyone on here who criticizes it simply dismisses all the evidence supporting it out of hand, which is probably why you see that reaction.

While I am not religious (I will call myself agnostic), and having an IQ well over genius levels, with scientific and mathematical tendencies, let me ask you a few questions, because what I see here are a bunch of people talking about «no evidence» or «proof» of God's existence, therefore He can't possibly exist, existential arguments, which are not arguments, but fearful, clouded alterations of a truth that can not be seen.

Whats rediculous is that there are people as yourself who have been so blinded that they cant even see the evidence, and results of a person who has faith.

If you want evidence, look at near - death experiences, or people who report seeing God or angels or Jesus.

Can you cite any evidence that mass murderers are more likely to have seen their mothers going at it with multiple partners than the average person?

Maybe other people helped her to see this evidence, but that does not mean she is being forced to convert any more than her athiest friends who were arguing for athiesm were forcing her to stay an athiest.

Honestly, I don't see you you could find that any more compelling than the «evidence» people use to cite regarding magic, or the little folk.

That's only useful when you need to rely upon talking people into seeing your point of view, and people with evidence on their side really shouldn't have to do that.

«But, at the same time, we have also seen evidence of some of the worst aspects of human nature, in that there are people - men, women and children - in this country who are going hungry, and yes, there are some people who attempt to abuse any system that is put in place, be that from the state or voluntary bodies.

I think you would really have to stretch things a lot to argue that there wasn't an actual person who was the root of the Jesus legend, but to say that everything outlined in the Gospels is a historical record of that person is something that very few scholars would claim, and I can't think of any who would try to argue that claims to godhood can be seen as historical evidence of actual godhood.

It is when i see religious people try to tell me that i m not good with out god, with no evidence that I object and speak up.