Not exact matches
If it became a robust community, you would undoubtedly start to
see people create and trade virtual
objects for real money.
In addition, Waymo said it has now developed short and long range LIDAR sensors that allow its vehicles to «
see small
people and
objects close to the car, and spot tiny
objects far away, too,» the CEO said.
People object to a system that they
see as being dominated by big pharma, a system that intrusively asserts control over our lives, telling us what's wrong with us, and telling us what we must do in order to get better (as they choose to define «better»).
Perhaps the first thing to understand is that when LeCun discusses computer vision, it's not the same as how a
person sees, although the process of teaching software how to recognize an
object has some similarities.
Many
people think that the Great Wall of China is the only man - made
object that can be
seen from space.
Imagine, for example, augmented reality heads - up displays that
see everything you do, and provide real - time cloud - driven information about the
people and
objects around you.
A
person involved in the investigation said, however, that experts from Boeing and the National Transportation Safety Board who had
seen the
object, a piece of what is known as a flaperon, were not yet fully satisfied, and called for further analysis.
If a
person is suffering from hallucinations it may not mean that the
object is there but you can not state that they do not
see it.
He guides
persons and
objects from within as the soul directs the body (
see 1:399).
I think its good to have the awareness that
people may
see us as
objects and not like it.
He is, rather, a very complex structured society which sustains, among many other societies, a regnant, personally ordered, subordinate society (an enduring
object) which Whitehead refers to as «the soul of which Plato spoke» (Adventures of Ideas 267 —
see also pp. 263 - 264 for a clear statement of the distinction between «the ordinary meaning of the term «man,» which includes the total bodily man, and the narrow sense of «man,» where «man» is considered a
person in Whitehead's technical sense, i.e., as the regnant, personally ordered society which he identifies as his equivalent of Descartes» thinking substance and Plato's soul).
It is when i
see religious
people try to tell me that i m not good with out god, with no evidence that I
object and speak up.
The idea is absent that sexual conduct can do harm to the health of one «sspirit, of one's humanity; that it can overthrow a
person's human balance, turning him or her obsessively in on self,
seeing in others no more than sex -
objects, incapable of any deep or lasting love or of the respect that is the very hallmark of love.
What frightens all reasonable
people is the fact that we
see about us, in our own neighborhoods, some of the same factors which, existing in greater degree, made that
object lesson actual.
People's conditionning in consumerism in subtle ways is changing the theological concept of faith, so that in certain theologies God is
seen not so much as the
object of service and obedience but as a convenient device by which one's religious needs are met.
The general point that has been made is that in the new conditions of the modern world the comparative study of religion has moved into a new phase — first, in that the
object of inquiry has on a quite new scale been
seen to be communities of
persons.
The problem is that a lot of the
people tuning in to
see Rousey and McGregor had little interest in the sport besides the
object of their fandom.
I can
see no reason why any other
person let alone an Arsenal fan would
object to peaceful protest to end this farce.
I want more
people to start
seeing breasts for their intended purpose, feeding babies, and not just as an oversexualized
object.
There is openness to
seeing computational
objects as «other minds»; there is willingness to consider what a computer and a human mind might have in common; and, in a different register, there is evidence of a certain fatigue with the difficulties of dealing with
people.
That's because she's starting to understand
object permanence (that an
object she can't
see can still exist) and loves games in which
people or things appear and disappear.
During this stage, babies are starting to understand
object permanence, which is the knowledge that an
object (or a
person) is still there even if they can not
see it.
It is also kind of what you would expect from an «
object», rather than a
person — the lack of empathy and inability to
see all sides of the coin.
People are
seen as interchangeable
objects, existing only to serve the child.
Many
people see breasts exclusively as sex
objects.
She continues to experiment with
object permanence — that
people and things still exist even when she can't
see them.
During Tummy Time, they can look up, left, and right to
see people and
objects around them.
Some
people only associate a breast as a sexual
object instead of it's purpose for feeding, so they may find it weird or bothersome to
see an older looking baby or toddler at the breast.
He
sees my breasts as a source of love and comfort, not a sexual
object as
people with no understanding think.
Teach your baby that
people and
objects still exist even when they can't
see them through a game of...
Firstly, he has to come up with an initiative which will be
seen as fair to the ordinary
person trying to get on in life or the «striver» (a word that I
object to — when was the last time you heard someone in the pub use it?).
According to the site the Liberal Democrats urged the creators to start the group to
see how many
people objected.
The terms 20/20 and 6/6 are derived from standardized sized
objects that can be
seen by a «
person of normal vision» at the specified distance.
Joshua Ackerman at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and his colleagues ran six tests on
people in the street, to
see whether the
objects they were touching could influence judgements and decision - making.
As
people use their hands to hold
objects and make gestures, a camera is unlikely to
see all parts of the hand at the same time.
In the first four videos the magician would do something with an
object, with the third video deliberately showing a non-magical action to check that
people could distinguish whether something was or was not a magic trick and were not
seeing a trick simply because they expected one.
The researchers suspect that the tall advantage comes down to angle: The higher up a
person's eyes, the more easily they can look down and
see the distance between two
objects.
The fact that the test
person feels their own hand being stroked, and simultaneously
sees the
object being touched synchronously, produces the sensation that the
object is part of their own body — because both pieces of information merge into one single percept.
However, a dark room in which a
person can
see only the
object removes many of the brain's tools for judging distance.
I can
see that maybe some
people don't like to show potential weaknesses of their work, but I strongly
object to this kind of thinking.
They are focused on applications for autonomous vehicles, some of which already have similar laser - based systems for detecting
objects around the car, but other uses could include
seeing through foliage from aerial vehicles or giving rescue teams the ability to find
people blocked from view by walls and rubble.
«Most
people in the past have
seen robots as machines that act on the world, that move
objects around,» says Latombe.
Only then could scientists consider making more complicated, three - dimensional assemblies for applications such as true - color holographic displays or Harry Potter — style invisibility cloaks that make
people and
objects we can
see disappear.
In the other, a
person grabs a hammerlike
object and clobbers the ape character with it (
see the video above).
A dose of caffeine slightly lower than that in a tall Starbucks coffee made
people more likely to correctly peg an
object as similar instead of mistaking it for a previously
seen object.
People with acuity of 20/80 are able to
see objects at 20 feet away that those with normal or 20/20 vision can
see from a distance of 80 feet.
Seeing the same area from many points of view could be confusing to a human, but a computer can manage it and combine all the information to build a «model» of the scene and track
objects and
people from place to place.
Open
people see more possibilities in even the most mundane of
objects.
A new paper in Heliyon reveals that materialistic
people see and treat their Facebook friends as «digital
objects,» and have significantly more friends than
people who are less interested in possessions.
Moreover, if we did not possess the ability to speedily determine lifelikeness, our world would be very confusing, with every
person, animal or
object we
see appearing to be equally alive, Whitney said.